Serial Misogynist Bill Maher: “Hey, Obama Kinda Sucked During Debate”


And provides some more words that will surely soon be considered racist

(The Blaze) During his HBO show on Friday, Liberal comedian Bill Maher, who donated $1 million to a pro-Obama Super PAC earlier this year, jokingly wondered what President Obama spent his money on after watching his poor debate performance this week, saying it looked like the president spent his entire donation on “weed.”

“I’m sorry, he sucked. He looked tired. He had trouble getting his answers out. He looked like he took my million and spent it all on weed,” Maher said.

The comedian said Obama looked “disinterested” and “annoyed” at the debate while his rival Mitt Romney looked “all charged up.”

“And now we know what Michael Jackson looked like when he was on the Diprivan,” Maher joked.

Now, if a Conservative said those things, they would be considered racist, not to mention completely out of bounds, as the Credentialed Media would tell us in hundreds of stories and opinion pieces (not that there’s that much difference anymore). And that shot about Michael Jackson? Racist. Just like

“Seriously, I haven’t seen a black man look that disinterested and annoyed since I dragged Chris Rock to that beach boys concert,” he added.

Personally, I think Obama was out of it because he was upset that someone was actually allowed to talk back as well as having his time to pontificate capped.

There’s video available at Mediaite, if you feel the need.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

Related Articles

2

Mickey Kaus, Union Fighter?

For the Washington Post’s Post Partisan Blog Charles Lane’s somewhat irreverent, perhaps even dismissive treatment of the admittedly quixotic Senate

6

Amendment To Continuing Resolution Would Bar Obama Golf Outings On Public Dime

At least until PINO Obama resumes White House tours (Daily Caller) Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert introduced an amendment to

4

New Yorker Imagines An Obama 2nd Term

Would you be shocked that it mostly ignores anything remotely resembling a healed economy and policies that lead to one?