For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Should Scozzafava be the beginning of something bigger?
Written By : Matt Latimer

In Human Events today, I talk about the effort by conservatives to back Doug Hoffman over the liberal backed by the GOP establishment. And I wonder if this isn’t the beginning of something more important — a fight not only within the GOP but AGAINST the GOP and its current leadership. There is precedent for conservatives to turn against a party that lost its way and vote it out of power (even out of existence). More on “The Canada option” below.

“Canadians aren’t especially well known for innovative ideas in governance (government-run health care, anyone?)  Yet not that long ago, Canadian conservatives hit upon an idea that was quite creative, indeed even drastic.  Fed up with a party that no longer represented their beliefs, they voted Canada’s version of the Republican Party, the oddly-named Progressive Conservatives, completely out of existence.

“The Progressive Conservatives had been a major force in Canada since the 1860s — coincidentally, right about the time the Republican Party was formed in the States. Over time the Progressive Conservatives became overrun by consultants fixated on short-term tactics over a long-term strategy. Party leaders who had grown comfortable with power were entangled in corruption scandals. The party developed a reputation for mismanagement and oversaw an economic disaster said to be on a par with the Great Depression. It experienced a steady drift away from conservative principles, in favor of an ever expansive federal government, until ultimately it reached an all-time low in public opinion polls. Any of that sound familiar?

“When parliamentary elections were called in 1993, Canadian conservatives, long turned off by the party, finally turned away altogether. When the election was over, the party that had ruled Canada off and on since the days of Lincoln lost every seat in parliament except for two, not even enough to qualify as a legitimate opposition group. The Progressive Conservatives, in effect, ceased to exist. In its place rose a new political organization — then called The Reform Party — that eventually became the dominant conservative force in the country. It’s doing quite well, thank you. Their current leader is now Canada’s prime minister.

“The parallels are not perfect, of course. But is it finally time for American conservatives to follow the neighbors’ example — and throw all of the bums out?

“Like Canada’s former ruling party, the Republicans are now being run by consultants and strategists focused on short-term political tactics — on vote margins and polling numbers rather than principles and ideas. While conservatives were pushed aside, these strategists reversed the party’s positions on illegal immigration, on climate change, on restraining spending, on a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, on an accord with North Korea. The party of lower taxes, smaller government and a strong defense became incoherent — and unrecognizable. There is a reason why people self-identifying with the GOP reached an all-time low.”

I also take on the argument put forward by GOP strategists and the mainstream media that conservatives need to favor “electability” over “ideology.”

“We’ve heard this argument before, of course. Electability was the reason why we were all supposed to back Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania over an actual conservative challenging him in the GOP primary. (Senator Specter sure knows how to express his gratitude.) It’s why party leaders are backing a disappointing “moderate” like Charlie Crist over conservative Mario Rubio in Florida. I suppose that’s also why the more media-friendly Kay Bailey Hutchison, supported by GOP elites, is now trying to unseat the more conservative Governor Rick Perry in Texas. (Is the sitting governor of Texas suddenly unelectable?) And electability was the reason we were urged to support a Congressional candidate in New York State more liberal than the Democrat in the race, until conservatives stood up en masse and finally said, “Enough.”

Read more here.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34221

Read more about how conservatives lost their way in Washington, D.C. and how we need to reclaim the party here. http://www.amazon.com/Speech-less-Tales-White-House-Survivor/dp/0307463729/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257167902&sr=8-1

0
  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    Mike,

    watch the attacks on Palin escalate in the next few days. And Nixon bets half of them will come from RINO's. They don't like seeing the writing on the wall that Palin's atom bombing of ScuzzyFuzzy signaled.

  • Mike_M

    "It's us against all of them."

    Brave new world, cav. The winners of the establishment that was set up in the 1930's are on the verge of being disposessed and they're starting to scream.

    In the style of our favorite Chicago crony: Mass media *thud* (kinfe into desk) Dead. Big government *thud* Dead. Entitlements *thud* Dead.

    Oh, they're all dead. The question is what will be left in their place when the old order fades away in the next few years. If conservatism wins the battle for hearts and minds we can get to work doing the business of the future…disassembling big government and giving rise to a new area of individualism. If the liberals win we're looking at the Weimar States of America, untold misery and poverty, and probably civil war.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    When I heard that Scozzafava threw her support to the Democrat after quitting, I heard evidence that the two parties are working together against us, the regular people of this country. It's us against all of them.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    The elitist leadership must be literally soiling themselves at the thought of Sarah Palin being the leader of the Republican Party

    Yes, but she'll either be the leader of the Republican party or of a new Conservative party that peels away 90% of the Republican party's supporters.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    If the liberals win we're looking at the Weimar States of America, untold misery and poverty, and probably civil war.

    Not to mention surrender of American sovereignty to either the UN or China, or both.

  • Mike_M

    Oh this is a big deal, and I suspect it's even more important to the Republican Party than to the conservative base.

    Look at the facts: one of the biggest names in the party (Newt) along with the party leadership endorsed, for all intents and purposes, a liberal Democrat. Not only that, a liberal Democrat the performed poorly, dropped out of the race, and actually endorsed the running Democrat. They dumped a lot of money and effort into the race that was supposed to be a bellweather for 2010. There now is no Republican candidate running at all. Worse, the conservative blogosphere and Sarah Palin took the GOP leadership head on and dealt them a humiliating defeat. If Hoffman wins it's gravy but the damage has been done.

    The GOP now has a big decision to make. Deal with the seismic shift of power in the party and let conservatives take the wheel, or cling to the middle and risk a wave of Hoffmans while the party withers and dies. The elitist leadership must be literally soiling themselves at the thought of Sarah Palin being the leader of the Republican Party, but it's time for the illusions of complacency to be banished once and for all. The big government gravy train is not going to last forever, and the end is coming sooner rather then later. The media will always hate the GOP, so ram conservatism and Palin down their throat and trust the voters to choose between reality and the media's world of illusion once and for all.

    This entire country has been living in a moderate, no-consequences, fantasyland for far too long. Obama was right, the country is going to be fundamentally changed soon. Now the GOP has to decide if it will be on their terms or Obama's. The base isn't willing to give up, they shouldn't be either.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    Cav,

    would you say that Palin is now the leading Conservative political figure in the US?

  • Mike_M

    "Not to mention surrender of American sovereignty to either the UN or China, or both."

    Both parties have already agreed to allow America to be a dumping ground for any cheap toxic product that the Chinese can spit out of a factory in order to keep the debt flowing.

    Toys made out of lead, CFLs brimming with mercury, poisonous dog food. The next bomb to go off is going to be toxic Chinese drywall which is in huge numbers of construction-boom houses. Our government says and does nothing because holding China responsible might cause them so say "so solly" and cut off the cash that allows our politicians to avoid making difficult decisions.

    Obama was prepared to sign us over to the UN at Copenhagen but it turns out that the people aren't as ready for global fascism as he thought we were.

    We'll know if Palin is for real depending on her answer to the question: "What will you do about American's deficit and obligations to other countries, specifically China?"

  • Bill_Dalasio

    If Hoffman wins it's gravy but the damage has been done.

    No. It isn't. If Hoffman loses, the pinheads running the party have every reason to claim that all conservatives can do is spoil things for the Republicans unless they go with a candidate that can't win. That puts conservatives in the role of a marginalizing factor. If all you can show is that you can damage your allies, you don't give much of an incentive to ally with you.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    would you say that Palin is now the leading Conservative political figure in the US?

    If Hoffman wins in NY23, I believe she will be in a position to leverage her part in that victory into a serious claim on that title. Hey, look, I can speak political!

  • Tennwriter

    Mike M,

    In light of your recent statements…

    Palin/Mike 2012! :)

    Bill,

    At worst its a ‘hand on the horizon’. Being able to bring the pain is a worthy ability in politics, so its not as bad as you say. Of course, we both hope for more than that.

    As to Cav,

    Kill him NOW! He’s mutating!

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info