Tea Party: Instantly Attacked by Old Media, Coffee Party: Immediate Respect from Old Media
Nothing says “media bias” like coffee in the morning.
If anyone ever wanted to see an example of the bias of the Old Media no better example can be found than the different ways that it has treated the tea party movement and the coffee party astroturf effort. The tea party movement was initially ignored, then it was ridiculed, then it was attacked as dangerous, but no where in the Old Media was it treated as a valid, powerful political movement despite the literally millions of Americans that have attended them.
On the other hand, the astroturf coffee party effort created by an Obama campaign staffer was treated as a viable, important effort from the second it was announced and all that quite despite the fact that no coffee party event seems to have been able to turn out more than 20 people at a time.
Let’s look at some numbers. Just from those first tax day tea party events (April 15, 2009) the number of participants topped *500,000. And since then there have been thousands of more tea party protests of all sorts sponsored by any number of local and national groups and they, too, have turned out thousands of participants. There have been tea party participants in the millions since April of 2009.
Of course, the Old Media has done its best to downplay the number of tea party protestors. Instead of detailing the actual numbers, the Old Media continues to use the nebulous phrase “hundreds of protestors,” or when the numbers are greater the dismissive “thousands of protestors.” An excellent example of this can be seen in the great Washington D.C. protest of September of 2009. Where the foreign press noted that as many as a million flooded Washington D.C. on September 12, 2009, the American Old Media insisted on using the less accurate phrase “tens of thousands.” When asked to quantify a million people no one would use the phrase “tens of thousands,” unless, of course, they were trying to diminish the amount.
Also since April of 2009, we have seen tea party groups begin a foray into local politics. From coast to coast tea party groups have been holding candidate forums, endorsing candidates, and proffering candidates from their own ranks. Now, as it is right now this moment, we are still at a nascent stage of these electoral efforts, so it is difficult to say what will come of it. But the fact is, they’ve begun at various levels from north to south and east to west.
On top of all of that, tea party events have been held in every state and have been seen to turn out hundreds and thousands even in liberal areas of the country. But have we seen even a begrudging respect for all this activism by the Old Media?
Sadly, even a year after this tea party movement began, a year after the energy and importance of this movement has been proven, a year after it has been seen to have produced an outpouring into the streets of millions of Americans that had never in their lives attended a protest — even with many of them never before having involved themselves in politics at all — we still have seen no respect for the tea partiers from the Old Media.
Here are just a tiny number of examples of the Old Media still attacking the tea partiers since 2009:
- New York Times Paul Krugman: Tea parties are fake astroturf
- Time Magazine’s Joe Klein: Tea partiers are racists
- New York Times: Tom Freidman says tea partiers are setting up an assassination atmosphere
- MSNBC: tea partiers are offensive
- Newsweek: Tea parties are loud, mad, and dangerous
- The AP: Tea Party filled with extremists
- Columbus Dispatch: Tea party is extreme right-wing
Of course, there are hundreds and hundreds more examples like this in every corner of the Old Media stretching from March of 2009 all the way to today. The Old Media has almost exclusively presented the tea party movement as fringe, dangerous, racist, yet ultimately unimportant. The Old Media has done its level best to undermine the tea party movement as much as possible, and continues to do so.
And then came the so-called coffee party effort. Just as Paul Krugman (among others) falsely claimed that the tea party movement was a fake, astroturf movement, they’ve treated the coffee party events differently by refusing to report it as the astroturf it is. The coffee party was invented by Annabel Park, a member of Barack Obama’s political campaign.
These coffee party events created by an Obama operative have been held in many Democrat strong hold cities but far fewer Republican areas. Not only have the coffee party events been far, far fewer in number, they’ve also been sparsely attended. Almost no coffee party effort has fielded more than 20 attendees, a far cry from the hundreds, thousands and hundreds of thousands of attendees that have attended tea party events. Yet despite the paltry turnout, the Old Media has treated the coffee party events as equal in seriousness to the tea party.
For instance, Newsweek recently published a story with the absurd claim that 200,000 coffee party members have turned out across the country. What is Newsweek’s proof that there are 200,000 members of the coffee party? Not attendance at events that’s for sure. No what was used as proof was the coffee party FaceBook page that shows that over 200,000 people “like” the page. 200,000 “likes” on FaceBook, however, does not translate into 200,000 members of the coffee party.
Since its debut a few months ago, this coffee party business has been treated quite well. Here are just a few of the laudatory stories on the coffee party effort:
- NBC: Virginia coffee party outlines goals
- Houston Chronicle: Coffee party making politics civil
- St. Louis Area: Coffee party big success in Belleville (7 participants showed)
- CBS: Is coffee party the next big thing?
- New York Times: Coffee party wonderful civic participation
- U.S. News: Coffee party kinder and gentler
- CNN: giving astroturfer room to say Why I started the coffee party
The Old Media has bent over backwards to assist the coffee party effort, so far that one article even made excuses for why the coffee party events never seem to have more than 20 folks turn out to them. The Chicago Sun-Times group recently published a story excusing the paltry numbers as somehow being done on purpose! Catch this falderal:
Coffee Parties are often kept intentionally small to facilitate conversation among members. The Naperville group, according to Harrington, typically sees about 10 members per meeting — the right size, he says, for making sure everybody is heard.
Oh, yeah, every grass roots political movement purposefully sets out to have as few people as possible catch the fever! Give me a break.
And let us remember that this coffee party astroturf effort to push Obama’s agenda has not resulted in any political momentum. Nearly universally the coffee party gatherings have featured about a dozen participants who get together and spin their wheels, all of whom then go home all ultimately to no effect. No candidates have claimed to be the “coffee party candidate,” no political candidates forums have been sponsored by coffee partiers and no candidates have stepped forth from the coffee party ranks. Additionally no large rallies have been held by coffee party groups to compete with the wild success of the tea party movement.
And yet the Old Media has treated the coffee party movement with the utmost respect and presented it as a viable opposing option to the tea party movement despite its paltry turn out and its nonexistent political influence all the while the millions of tea party members, their political candidates and influence is ignored, ridiculed and attacked by that same Old Media.
Yes, if there is no other example of the bias in the Old Media, this story does it.
*John M. O’Hara, “A New American Tea Party,” page 18.
(Originally posted at BigJournalism.com)
Even though my father, brother, uncles and grandfather were in the military, I seldom handled guns growing up. That’s because unlike many of the other people in my family, I’ve...Read More
Warner Todd Huston
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, BigJournalsim.com and all Breitbart News' other sites, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, and many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs across the country to discuss his opinion editorials and current events as well as appearing on TV networks such as CNN, Fox News, Fox Business Network, and various Chicago-based news programs. He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston and follow him on Twitter, on Google Plus , and Facebook.
Personally, I had thought he would not resign as long as the left leaning media ignored the story about his
Amusing note of the day: Well known Democratic advisor Joe Trippi called President Jimmy Carter’s a “failed presidency” on CNN
I’m guessing by now you already know that Van Jones, President Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar” tendered his resignation in the