Team Obama Refuses To Condemn Union Violence Threats In Michigan
So glad that Team Obama cares about a civil society after he whipped up the crowd during an appearance in Michigan on Monday
(Daily Caller) White House spokesman Jay Carney declined to condemn the increasing violence and threats by union members in Michigan, merely telling reporters Tuesday that “the president believes in debate that’s civil.”
When asked by a reporter about a claim by Michigan state Democrat that “there will be blood” should Republicans pass a union-choice law in Michigan, Carney professed ignorance and then downplayed the comment.
“I haven’t see those comments, and I’m not sure they mean what someone interprets them to mean,” he said.
Of course, the loony tunes on the Left are pushing a “false flag” narrative
When I saw this video—claiming that a “violent mob” destroyed the tent the Koch brothers had paid for in front of the Michigan Capitol—I knew right away it was likely a false flag. After all, Stranahan, James O’Keefe’s buddy, first posted it. Within minutes it was up at Drudge.
So, those weren’t union goons violently assaulting people? In fact, two of the union thugs have been identified. And every time we see this kind of violence it comes from Democrat voters.
Now we await to see what Jay Carney and/or Obama will say regarding the violence today, if any White House reporter is willing to ask.
The cover of Golf Digest’s now-infamous “10 Tips Obama Can Take From Tiger” issue was announced on the Web about five minutes before Woods’ career-altering misadventures at the end of November. But when I finally saw the issue on the newsstand around Christmastime, it occurred to me that it may be a miniature — albeit entirely unintended — version of “Bobos In Paradise”, “The Preppie Handbook”, and other books that marked mammoth elite overreach and smugness…
Using Democrat language, this is an indictment on the entire Democrat Party, showing that all Democrats are mean and filthy
If this doesn’t exemplify the left’s propensity to act in the mode of for-thee-but-not-me, nothing does. The Wall Street Journal