For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Era of Obama: Clorox Co. Loses Net Income to Taxes?
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

In a harbinger of profit statements to come, Clorox Co. — maker of numerous household cleaning products — reports that it’s net income was nearly flat despite a one percent rise in revenue.

The reason? Taxes.

Clorox Co. says its fourth-quarter net income was nearly flat, even though its revenue rose one percent, because it paid higher taxes and had smaller margins.

The laundry giant said that it earned $171 million in the last three months and had revenue of $1.52 billion last quarter. Clorox also reports that it expects to earn enough to keep in line with estimates.

So, sales have not been hurt by this recession for Clorox Co., at least. That is a good thing. But that its tax burden went up so much as to flatten its net income is unconscionable.

Businesses are in business to make money not forever break even. Breaking even is no incentive to push for higher achievement and invites sloth and eventual disinterest.

Without innovation and a return on the effort our economy will stagnate even further. As that happens tax receipts fall.

Obama is playing a dangerous game with our economy, folks. It’s one we are all bound to lose.

0
  • Mr. EMT

    When the lay off's start so the company can still show it earns a profit, liberals will respond it's all the fault of it's CEO's for not cutting their pay.

    Since taxes are not going to ever go down, and will only continue to go up until businesses are crushed or taken over by socialism (sorry, we are calling it nationalism after we bail them out), it would appear that if companies want to remain solvent they have some drstic choices to make in a short time to rob peter to pay paul, so to speak.
    Abolish unions and or cut wages… the later making it harder to pay personal taxes and enjoy the inalienable right to “pursuit of happiness” but at least cutting wages makes drooltarded liberals happy by creating less rich people, and therefor shrinking the economy yet further… and hurting other jobs and markets affected by people making less money and consequently spending less.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    But don't you see, only by taxing successful companies in to the red can we force them to hire more people and pull us out of the recession! Also that money is needed to prop up companies that are doing poorly (but that donated wisely).

    Somehow it will all work out, we just have to believe in Obama.

    (anyone who doesn't is racist and will make the plan fail, everyone has to be on board for this to work)

  • Guess

    The probably didnt have as good accountants as Exxon who paid no taxes at all.

    • Mediumheadboy

      Proof of that assertion (emphasis on “ass”) if you please?

    • UFKA_Smithwick

      Wow that's a whopper of a claim. You're going to have to provide evidence that Exxon-Mobile (exxon doesn't exist anymore) paid zero taxes.

  • Karma Hoser

    Confiscation and redistribution of wealth, a main tnet of liberalism!

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    Warner, as the weight of the fines, costs and penalties attached to the health care legislation hit American businesses, this will be a commonplace occurrence.

    As will the offshoring and downsizing which accompanies it.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info