The Union Money Party

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

The Union Money Party

Written By : Dave Blount

Why would center-right America elect Democrat politicians, who have increasingly revealed themselves not only to be left, but hard left, and who close observers of current events can’t help but be aware do not like this country or mean it well? Because elections aren’t about common sense — they are about money. Unions have it, and as events in Wisconsin and throughout the Midwest have made crystal clear, the Democrats are their party, bought and paid for. Via OpenSecrets.org:

Follow the list further and you’ll see that other big spenders that lean overwhelmingly toward the Dems include the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, Sheet Metal Workers Union, International Association of Fire Fighters, Plumbers and Pipefitters Union, United Steelworkers, United Transportation Union, Ironworkers Union, American Postal Workers Union, National Air Traffic Controllers Association, Transport Workers Union, Seafarers International Union, Amalgamated Transit Union, et cetera, ad nauseam.

Where do unions get all this money to spend installing Democrats in power? In the case of public sector unions, they get it from you.

Obama’s slavish devotion to unions may explain even better than his support from liberal media idiots impressed by his skin color how a guy with an alarming background and no serious qualifications could become president of the USA.

Don’t expect Democrat politicians to act in America’s interest. Expect them to act in the interests of the unions that own them.

Unions own General Motors now. They own the Democrat Party. They own the White House. When they own America, socialism will have arrived.

A member of the emerging ruling class.

On a tip from Lee. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Anonymous

Democrats keep talking about raising taxes to cut the budget woes. How about they tax union dues? Wouldn’t this help all Americans?

Anonymous

No it would only help the wealthy to get their hands on even more tax breaks.
Anonymous

No it would only help the wealthy to get their hands on even more tax breaks.

Toastrider

Point of order: Define ‘wealthy’.

I’m quite serious. What constitutes ‘wealthy’ to you? Others can chime in, I’m not picky.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

My guess is “more money than me,” that’s the usual leftist definition. Its a definition based on jealousy, not fact or reason. Envy of those who have more, and a childish inability to turn that into ambition and the drive to achieve more.

Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

LOL
Anonymous

This is why I like the idea of federalism. Let the federal government focus on a few things and leave the rest to the states.

So we can have states that practice as far leftwing socialism as the voters like, and states that are free from such nonsense.

It will be a great experiment, and as long as no state is allowed to be bailed out then it should nip this idiocy in the bud.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

My guess is “more money than me,” that’s the usual leftist definition. Its a definition based on jealousy, not fact or reason. Envy of those who have more, and a childish inability to turn that into ambition and the drive to achieve more.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

My guess is “more money than me,” that’s the usual leftist definition. Its a definition based on jealousy, not fact or reason. Envy of those who have more, and a childish inability to turn that into ambition and the drive to achieve more.
Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.

Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

And where do they live, does it matter what the cost of living is in their home? $300,000 a year is a lot of money in Wyoming but not so much in Manhattan.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

And where do they live, does it matter what the cost of living is in their home? $300,000 a year is a lot of money in Wyoming but not so much in Manhattan.
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Anonymous

So someone with $2,999,999 is poor?

Also is that wages, total wealth, what?
Toastrider

There we go. Hard numbers. That’s the ticket.

But, are we talking three mil in cold hard cash? Liquid assets? What about investments — house, stock, etc?
Toastrider

There we go. Hard numbers. That’s the ticket.

But, are we talking three mil in cold hard cash? Liquid assets? What about investments — house, stock, etc?
Toastrider

There we go. Hard numbers. That’s the ticket.

But, are we talking three mil in cold hard cash? Liquid assets? What about investments — house, stock, etc?
Toastrider

There we go. Hard numbers. That’s the ticket.

But, are we talking three mil in cold hard cash? Liquid assets? What about investments — house, stock, etc?
Toastrider

There we go. Hard numbers. That’s the ticket.

But, are we talking three mil in cold hard cash? Liquid assets? What about investments — house, stock, etc?

Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.
Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.
Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.
Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.
Anonymous

A person with $3,000,000.

Toastrider

Point of order: Define ‘wealthy’.

I’m quite serious. What constitutes ‘wealthy’ to you? Others can chime in, I’m not picky.

Anonymous

No it would only help the wealthy to get their hands on even more tax breaks.

Anonymous

Democrats keep talking about raising taxes to cut the budget woes. How about they tax union dues? Wouldn’t this help all Americans?
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Its incestuous though; without the Democratic Party, unions would be dying even faster.

Anonymous

The Democratic party and the unions have a common interest: representing the working person. Got a problem with that? What a foolish question.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Ah yes, the subtle nuanced viewpoint of the left: our guys always completely good, your guys always completely bad.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Ah yes, the subtle nuanced viewpoint of the left: our guys always completely good, your guys always completely bad.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Ah yes, the subtle nuanced viewpoint of the left: our guys always completely good, your guys always completely bad.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Ah yes, the subtle nuanced viewpoint of the left: our guys always completely good, your guys always completely bad.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Their common interest is representing the unions. Consider that less than 10% of the private sector workforce is unionized the two are not synonymous.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Their common interest is representing the unions. Consider that less than 10% of the private sector workforce is unionized the two are not synonymous.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Their common interest is representing the unions. Consider that less than 10% of the private sector workforce is unionized the two are not synonymous.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Their common interest is representing the unions. Consider that less than 10% of the private sector workforce is unionized the two are not synonymous.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

Show me one single case where unions represent their membership. Then show me one case where a union allowed a nonunion person to work in their area.

Freedom of choice? died a long time ago.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

That’s a flat out lie, neither the Dems nor or the unions are for the working man, they are all about themselves as groups. If they were for the working man they wouldn’t be trying to destroy business.

Anonymous

The Democratic party and the unions have a common interest: representing the working person. Got a problem with that? What a foolish question.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Its incestuous though; without the Democratic Party, unions would be dying even faster.
Anonymous

Another reason why public sector unions if not outright banned should at least be prevented from giving money to any party.

The fact that they are influencing elections of their own bosses using public funds that should be a gimme.

D-Vega

Kinda like Goldman Sachs.

TheDarkKnight

That would be the same Goldman Sachs that is in bed with your boy Obama, right?

D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.
D-Vega

And Bush’s, and Clinton’s, and Bush’s.

The Great Octopus.

TheDarkKnight

That would be the same Goldman Sachs that is in bed with your boy Obama, right?
TheDarkKnight

That would be the same Goldman Sachs that is in bed with your boy Obama, right?
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

It does, we’re being squeezed between two greedy and selfish forces: the corporate fat cats of some politically connected businesses and the politically connected unions. They don’t give a damn about you and me or anyone else, but themselves and their schemes.

But the unions you support blindly, unthinkingly, and unquestioningly.

Anonymous

Where ever unions function it is always to represent the best interests of working people. Likewise, what you call “themselves” are people elected by union members, the working people. Haven’t you ever belonged to a union?

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Yes, and it doesn’t do me any good except take money from me and give it to the democrats.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Yes, and it doesn’t do me any good except take money from me and give it to the democrats.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Yes, and it doesn’t do me any good except take money from me and give it to the democrats.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YWXM6Q6QGELGTT334IQMWB774Q David

Yes, and it doesn’t do me any good except take money from me and give it to the democrats.
Anonymous

Douchebag, I once belonged to the Teamsters in the 1970s and we went on strike for better wages. After walking a picket line for four weeks (with the Union boss driving up in his Cadillac to cheer us on), we ended up getting a nickel raise. That’s when I dropped out of the union, went back to school, and never looked back.
Anonymous

Douchebag, I once belonged to the Teamsters in the 1970s and we went on strike for better wages. After walking a picket line for four weeks (with the Union boss driving up in his Cadillac to cheer us on), we ended up getting a nickel raise. That’s when I dropped out of the union, went back to school, and never looked back.
Anonymous

Douchebag, I once belonged to the Teamsters in the 1970s and we went on strike for better wages. After walking a picket line for four weeks (with the Union boss driving up in his Cadillac to cheer us on), we ended up getting a nickel raise. That’s when I dropped out of the union, went back to school, and never looked back.
Anonymous

Douchebag, I once belonged to the Teamsters in the 1970s and we went on strike for better wages. After walking a picket line for four weeks (with the Union boss driving up in his Cadillac to cheer us on), we ended up getting a nickel raise. That’s when I dropped out of the union, went back to school, and never looked back.
Anonymous

Douchebag, I once belonged to the Teamsters in the 1970s and we went on strike for better wages. After walking a picket line for four weeks (with the Union boss driving up in his Cadillac to cheer us on), we ended up getting a nickel raise. That’s when I dropped out of the union, went back to school, and never looked back.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bullshit, unions represent unions nothing more.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bullshit, unions represent unions nothing more.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bullshit, unions represent unions nothing more.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bullshit, unions represent unions nothing more.

Anonymous

Where ever unions function it is always to represent the best interests of working people. Likewise, what you call “themselves” are people elected by union members, the working people. Haven’t you ever belonged to a union?
D-Vega

I support their membership, not necessarily the leadership. The members have a responsibility to keep their unions clean. And over the years, it’s gotten a LOT better. A LOT friggin’ better than other industries that are more corrupt.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Yet its not the rank and file you agree with but their leadership in every policy decision, and the leadership you defend and support.

Funny how that works.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Yet its not the rank and file you agree with but their leadership in every policy decision, and the leadership you defend and support.

Funny how that works.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Yet its not the rank and file you agree with but their leadership in every policy decision, and the leadership you defend and support.

Funny how that works.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Yet its not the rank and file you agree with but their leadership in every policy decision, and the leadership you defend and support.

Funny how that works.

D-Vega

I support their membership, not necessarily the leadership. The members have a responsibility to keep their unions clean. And over the years, it’s gotten a LOT better. A LOT friggin’ better than other industries that are more corrupt.
D-Vega

I support their membership, not necessarily the leadership. The members have a responsibility to keep their unions clean. And over the years, it’s gotten a LOT better. A LOT friggin’ better than other industries that are more corrupt.
D-Vega

I support their membership, not necessarily the leadership. The members have a responsibility to keep their unions clean. And over the years, it’s gotten a LOT better. A LOT friggin’ better than other industries that are more corrupt.
D-Vega

I support their membership, not necessarily the leadership. The members have a responsibility to keep their unions clean. And over the years, it’s gotten a LOT better. A LOT friggin’ better than other industries that are more corrupt.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

It does, we’re being squeezed between two greedy and selfish forces: the corporate fat cats of some politically connected businesses and the politically connected unions. They don’t give a damn about you and me or anyone else, but themselves and their schemes.

But the unions you support blindly, unthinkingly, and unquestioningly.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

It does, we’re being squeezed between two greedy and selfish forces: the corporate fat cats of some politically connected businesses and the politically connected unions. They don’t give a damn about you and me or anyone else, but themselves and their schemes.

But the unions you support blindly, unthinkingly, and unquestioningly.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.
Anonymous

So you’re saying the government shouldn’t be funding businesses?

I agree.

Let’s work on that by voting out GMs CEO, Mr. Obama, come 2012.

D-Vega

Kinda like Goldman Sachs.
D-Vega

Kinda like Goldman Sachs.

Anonymous

Another reason why public sector unions if not outright banned should at least be prevented from giving money to any party.

The fact that they are influencing elections of their own bosses using public funds that should be a gimme.
Anonymous

Another reason why public sector unions if not outright banned should at least be prevented from giving money to any party.

The fact that they are influencing elections of their own bosses using public funds that should be a gimme.
Anonymous

Another reason why public sector unions if not outright banned should at least be prevented from giving money to any party.

The fact that they are influencing elections of their own bosses using public funds that should be a gimme.
D-Vega

And this is the number 1 reason why Republicans everywhere are doing their darndest to bust the unions.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Maybe they just want unions to stop being so political, especially with other peoples’ money. Is that idea that even possible, to you?

D-Vega

It’s not other people’s money. It’s the members’ money.

It’s not the taxpayer’s money. It’s not a Republican governor’s money. It’s the members’ money.

If the members don’t want their money sent to Dems, then that’s up to them to state to the union.

But I have a feeling that after this year, the member are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.
D-Vega

It’s not other people’s money. It’s the members’ money.

It’s not the taxpayer’s money. It’s not a Republican governor’s money. It’s the members’ money.

If the members don’t want their money sent to Dems, then that’s up to them to state to the union.

But I have a feeling that after this year, the member are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Except the unions don’t ask the members how they should donate money.

“But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.”

Maybe, but don’t think that all union members or even most are in lock stop with Dems; Public or Private.

D-Vega

Again, if the union members have a problem with that, they can take it up with the union leadership.

Republican don’t care about that though. They care about busting the union so Dems will suffer.
Anonymous

yep, we will cut the money off in 2013 when we ban public sector unions at the federal level.
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

I;m with CT. Quit playing Nostrodamus,you suck
at it.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

I;m with CT. Quit playing Nostrodamus,you suck
at it.
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
D-Vega

How will you do that when you will be the minority party?
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

You guys are both way more confident in your ability to predict the future than I am.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

You guys are both way more confident in your ability to predict the future than I am.
Anonymous

yep, we will cut the money off in 2013 when we ban public sector unions at the federal level.
Anonymous

yep, we will cut the money off in 2013 when we ban public sector unions at the federal level.
Anonymous

yep, we will cut the money off in 2013 when we ban public sector unions at the federal level.
Anonymous

yep, we will cut the money off in 2013 when we ban public sector unions at the federal level.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Like the leaders listen to the members!!!?!

Are you really that blind?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Like the leaders listen to the members!!!?!

Are you really that blind?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Like the leaders listen to the members!!!?!

Are you really that blind?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Like the leaders listen to the members!!!?!

Are you really that blind?
D-Vega

Again, if the union members have a problem with that, they can take it up with the union leadership.

Republican don’t care about that though. They care about busting the union so Dems will suffer.
D-Vega

Again, if the union members have a problem with that, they can take it up with the union leadership.

Republican don’t care about that though. They care about busting the union so Dems will suffer.
D-Vega

Again, if the union members have a problem with that, they can take it up with the union leadership.

Republican don’t care about that though. They care about busting the union so Dems will suffer.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Except the unions don’t ask the members how they should donate money.

“But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.”

Maybe, but don’t think that all union members or even most are in lock stop with Dems; Public or Private.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Except the unions don’t ask the members how they should donate money.

“But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.”

Maybe, but don’t think that all union members or even most are in lock stop with Dems; Public or Private.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Except the unions don’t ask the members how they should donate money.

“But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.”

Maybe, but don’t think that all union members or even most are in lock stop with Dems; Public or Private.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Right, individual members, not the union leadership’s. If the members don’t care for this sort of political thing, too bad, the dues will be spent to prop up Democrats. The members can state it all they want but that won’t change the spending.

During the Bush administration they had more of a voice to complain, but Obama slashed the budget of that office and put an AFL-CIO guy in charge of the department of labor. So much for the little guy’s voice.

Its not possible for unions to support Democrats any more.
Anonymous

If the members don’t want their money sent to Dems, then that’s up to them to state to the union.

You can’t possibly be that fuggin’ stupid.

You don’t think right-leaning members tell union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on candidates they don’t support?

You don’t don’t think right-leaning members don’t tell their union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on causes they don’t support?

I know people who scream from the high heavens about union dues being confiscated from their paychecks and being told to pound sand. That if they don’t like it, they can quit.

Yeah. That’s the ticket. Any public sector job – be it teacher, social worker, corrections officer, state trooper, cop, firefighter et al – you’re given a choice – a choice of giving to Democrats against your will, or finding another job in another field.

It’s bullshit. And you know it. Yet, you still defend it.

But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.

You just keep thinking that. Show’s just how fuckin’ out of touch you really are.

That’s why your thugs are fighting this. It ain’t about collective bargaining. It’s about the ability to opt out. And once people are no longer forced to pay into Democratic slush funds, the gravy train stops running.

And it’s about damn time.
Anonymous

If the members don’t want their money sent to Dems, then that’s up to them to state to the union.

You can’t possibly be that fuggin’ stupid.

You don’t think right-leaning members tell union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on candidates they don’t support?

You don’t don’t think right-leaning members don’t tell their union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on causes they don’t support?

I know people who scream from the high heavens about union dues being confiscated from their paychecks and being told to pound sand. That if they don’t like it, they can quit.

Yeah. That’s the ticket. Any public sector job – be it teacher, social worker, corrections officer, state trooper, cop, firefighter et al – you’re given a choice – a choice of giving to Democrats against your will, or finding another job in another field.

It’s bullshit. And you know it. Yet, you still defend it.

But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.

You just keep thinking that. Show’s just how fuckin’ out of touch you really are.

That’s why your thugs are fighting this. It ain’t about collective bargaining. It’s about the ability to opt out. And once people are no longer forced to pay into Democratic slush funds, the gravy train stops running.

And it’s about damn time.
Anonymous

If the members don’t want their money sent to Dems, then that’s up to them to state to the union.

You can’t possibly be that fuggin’ stupid.

You don’t think right-leaning members tell union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on candidates they don’t support?

You don’t don’t think right-leaning members don’t tell their union leaders they don’t want their dues spent on causes they don’t support?

I know people who scream from the high heavens about union dues being confiscated from their paychecks and being told to pound sand. That if they don’t like it, they can quit.

Yeah. That’s the ticket. Any public sector job – be it teacher, social worker, corrections officer, state trooper, cop, firefighter et al – you’re given a choice – a choice of giving to Democrats against your will, or finding another job in another field.

It’s bullshit. And you know it. Yet, you still defend it.

But I have a feeling that after this year, the members are going to be demanding the unions support Dems even more.

You just keep thinking that. Show’s just how fuckin’ out of touch you really are.

That’s why your thugs are fighting this. It ain’t about collective bargaining. It’s about the ability to opt out. And once people are no longer forced to pay into Democratic slush funds, the gravy train stops running.

And it’s about damn time.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

So the members voted on and passed to send millions to DC? Members voted on and passed to spend millions in protests in WI?

Sorry but no they did not.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

So the members voted on and passed to send millions to DC? Members voted on and passed to spend millions in protests in WI?

Sorry but no they did not.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

So the members voted on and passed to send millions to DC? Members voted on and passed to spend millions in protests in WI?

Sorry but no they did not.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Maybe they just want unions to stop being so political, especially with other peoples’ money. Is that idea that even possible, to you?
Anonymous

And this is the number 1 reason why Republicans everywhere are doing their darndest to bust the unions.

Thats pretty dishonest Vega. There is one union, and one union only, that is the target. PUBLIC SECTOR. The local carpenters union hasnt even made the news. The problem is that they are taking tax money and funneling it right back to the democrat election apparatus. And nobody wants to bust them up. Only reign them in and give people a choice.
Anonymous

And this is the number 1 reason why Republicans everywhere are doing their darndest to bust the unions.

Thats pretty dishonest Vega. There is one union, and one union only, that is the target. PUBLIC SECTOR. The local carpenters union hasnt even made the news. The problem is that they are taking tax money and funneling it right back to the democrat election apparatus. And nobody wants to bust them up. Only reign them in and give people a choice.

D-Vega

And this is the number 1 reason why Republicans everywhere are doing their darndest to bust the unions.
D-Vega

And this is the number 1 reason why Republicans everywhere are doing their darndest to bust the unions.
Anonymous

Okay, can we know have the list of fat cats not associated with any organization and see who contributed? Since the amounts of money given to both parties is about the same, we have to assume that rich people like the Koch brothers are making up the difference.

At least most of the organizations shown above represent working people, and I am pleased to learn that my money is being put where it will do ordinary people the most good. That we have seen wealth and income inequality increase during the period assessed, one has to guess that the rich are doing a much better job is selling their agenda than the middle class and poor.

Toastrider

‘At least most of the organizations shown above represent working people’

Er, no. No, they don’t, not with unions comprising what, 17 percent of the workforce?

They represent themselves, joe. They exist to perpetuate themselves.

D-Vega

Yes, indeed. Unions do represent the working class in this country.
D-Vega

Yes, indeed. Unions do represent the working class in this country.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

There must not be many working class people in America, because unions are dying.

D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Whether that’s true or not, its obvious that unions only represent a small number of working class people, not the whole or even a large number of them.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Whether that’s true or not, its obvious that unions only represent a small number of working class people, not the whole or even a large number of them.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

Whether that’s true or not, its obvious that unions only represent a small number of working class people, not the whole or even a large number of them.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

Could it be the federal, state and local labor laws castrate unions?
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

Could it be the federal, state and local labor laws castrate unions?
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

Could it be the federal, state and local labor laws castrate unions?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

No actually it IS because people don’t want to be in unions.

Look at how many traditionally unionized industries are losing union shops.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

No actually it IS because people don’t want to be in unions.

Look at how many traditionally unionized industries are losing union shops.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.
D-Vega

It’s not because workers wouldn’t want to be in one, though. It’s that the American economy is much different in terms of industries. And we have suffered from it.

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

There must not be many working class people in America, because unions are dying.
http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

There must not be many working class people in America, because unions are dying.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1763994972 Steffen Caldwell

No they haven’t and they haven’t in the last 30 years.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Unions represent unions, unions quit representing employees about 30 years ago.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Unions represent unions, unions quit representing employees about 30 years ago.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Unions represent unions, unions quit representing employees about 30 years ago.
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?
Anonymous

Only 10% of the country is working class?

Toastrider

‘At least most of the organizations shown above represent working people’

Er, no. No, they don’t, not with unions comprising what, 17 percent of the workforce?

They represent themselves, joe. They exist to perpetuate themselves.

Anonymous

Okay, can we know have the list of fat cats not associated with any organization and see who contributed? Since the amounts of money given to both parties is about the same, we have to assume that rich people like the Koch brothers are making up the difference.

At least most of the organizations shown above represent working people, and I am pleased to learn that my money is being put where it will do ordinary people the most good. That we have seen wealth and income inequality increase during the period assessed, one has to guess that the rich are doing a much better job is selling their agenda than the middle class and poor.
Soldout

The host of this site has had his own problems with obesity, so it’s ironic you’rd post a photo of a union member with a weight problem as if to support your cause.

Toastrider

Flagged for personal attack. Toodles.
Anonymous

you live in a shit hole that homeless people wouldn’t take a shit in.

Soldout

The host of this site has had his own problems with obesity, so it’s ironic you’rd post a photo of a union member with a weight problem as if to support your cause.
Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.

Anonymous

Why? Why not move to one of a 100 countries already enjoying the ‘benefits’ of your style of government?

What’s the desire to ruin the last place where the state is held in check?

It’s like arab nations being pissed off that this one little jewish state controls .0001% of arab land. You have the rest, be content with that.
Anonymous

Why? Why not move to one of a 100 countries already enjoying the ‘benefits’ of your style of government?

What’s the desire to ruin the last place where the state is held in check?

It’s like arab nations being pissed off that this one little jewish state controls .0001% of arab land. You have the rest, be content with that.
Anonymous

Why? Why not move to one of a 100 countries already enjoying the ‘benefits’ of your style of government?

What’s the desire to ruin the last place where the state is held in check?

It’s like arab nations being pissed off that this one little jewish state controls .0001% of arab land. You have the rest, be content with that.
Anonymous

Why? Why not move to one of a 100 countries already enjoying the ‘benefits’ of your style of government?

What’s the desire to ruin the last place where the state is held in check?

It’s like arab nations being pissed off that this one little jewish state controls .0001% of arab land. You have the rest, be content with that.
Anonymous

Why? Why not move to one of a 100 countries already enjoying the ‘benefits’ of your style of government?

What’s the desire to ruin the last place where the state is held in check?

It’s like arab nations being pissed off that this one little jewish state controls .0001% of arab land. You have the rest, be content with that.

Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.
Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.
Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.
Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.
Anonymous

“When they own America, socialism will have arrived.”
————–
We await this with hope.

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”

Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth

Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers

The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation

The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans

Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN