BREAKING: The Wiretapping Scandal Just Got a LOT Worse

by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | April 17, 2017 2:25 pm

Oh. My. God.[1] If this is true, it is incredible. The Daily Wire is a pretty good source and they are saying that The Guardian dropped a bombshell where they claim basically that every Western intelligence agency had a hand in helping the Obama administration conduct surveillance on President Trump and those associated with him. Let that sink in really, really deep. Notice how most of the left and the media have stopped the Russian witch hunt against Trump. This is why. I’m personally stunned by this.

I’ve brought up the “Five Eyes” spying alliance previously, but even I didn’t dream it was this widespread. This is damning and Barack Obama should be held accountable for something that makes Nixon’s antics look childish in comparison. I’ve also told you about SIGINT before… “Signals intelligence (SIGINT) is intelligence-gathering by interception of signals, whether communications between people (communications intelligence—abbreviated to COMINT) or from electronic signals not directly used in communication (electronic intelligence—abbreviated to ELINT). Signals intelligence is a subset of intelligence collection management.”

[2]

From The Daily Wire:

If you are wondering why our national media has pretty much dropped the whole Trump-Is-A-Russian-Manchurian-Candidate thing, it is because the naked truth about the Obama administration’s chilling spying — something the media has covered up for months[3] — is finally coming to light. Last week, both The Washington Post and The New York Times quietly reported that the Obama administration had “wiretapped[4]” (their word, not mine) a Trump staffer.

The Trump-hating Guardian then dropped another bombshell[5], the news that pretty much every Western intelligence agency in the world was aiding and abetting the Obama administration’s unbelievable and unprecedented (Nixon only wanted to do this) abuse of power against a political opponent:

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.

Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.

I stood by Judge Napolitano when everyone, including Fox News turned on him. I said he was right and he is being vindicated now. This is what Napolitano claimed back in June and now it is coming to light. The Brits are in this up to their eyeballs. They lied when they said they weren’t involved in surveillance of Trump and they played a crucial role in gathering intelligence.

GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

From PowerLine’s John Hinderaker[6]:

The blindingly obvious point that the Guardian tries to obscure is that the combined assets of all of these agencies failed to find any evidence of collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia. We know this, because the Democrats have pulled out all the stops. Both before the election, and especially after the election, they have leaked furiously to try to discredit President Trump. If there were any evidence of collusion between Trump (or even obscure, minor “advisers” like Carter Page) and Russia, there would have been nothing else in the Washington Post or the New York Times for the past five months. But they have nothing.

With the whole world trying to dig up dirt on Trump, they’ve got exactly nothing. If they had anything, it would have been everywhere… the left and the media would have made sure of it. What we do have is a boat load of evidence that Barack Obama was spying on a political opponent and his team for over a year before they took office. These countries were so certain that Hillary Clinton was going to win, that they rushed to do this for Obama, even though they knew it was unethical and wrong. You are seeing what it would have been like having Clinton as President. It would have been a repressive dictatorship. Obama needs to answer for this one way or another.

[7]

[8]

Purchase from Amazon Here[9]