For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Angry Man Shows Up To Give Tired, Recycled Speech
Written By : William Teach

Did I watch the speech? No. I went to the gym. Did I listen to it on my MP3 player with a radio or read the captions on the TV? No. Like the really boring “Interview with the Vampire” and horrible “Terminator: Salvation”, I felt no need to read or watch Obama’s speech. I’ve seen and read it before (full transcript here). But, fortunately, the Politico’s Glenn Thrush is there to cheerlead

Like a getaway driver desperately trying to shake a tail, President Barack Obama executed a hairpin turn from deficits to jobs Thursday, daring Republicans to follow him.

The problem for Obama – even the fiery, focused Obama who addressed a joint session of Congress Thursday – is that his political fate in 2012 is tied to the unforgiving, largely uncontrollable metrics of economic misery.

See? It’s not his fault, everything that happens is out of his control, and you mean, evil, raaaaacist TEA party members should stop blaming him.

And none of his potential GOP opponents will be held accountable if Obama’s $447 billion proposal fails to stem the economy’s ominous slide, while all of them will arguably profit if he fails.

Want to bet? The media and the Democrats will surely blame the GOP if the plan fails. Of course, it will not pass the House. At least not as written. If it has been written. Speaker Boehner should have done a one minute response to Obama and simply said “Thank you for telling us what your plan is, Mr. President. You say you want us to pass it right away. You said that numerous times. We’ll, we can’t pass a speech, so, we’ll expect to see it first thing Friday morning.”

But the White House and Obama campaign officials feel they regained some of the initiative, and say his speech accomplished three major goals by reaffirming his leadership with a credible jobs bill, putting Republicans on the defensive, and bucking up demoralized Democrats, who have lately taken to musing publicly about their leader’s backbone.

In other words, it was a campaign speech.

…Thursday night, he pivoted left, angrily demanding “immediate” action on a relatively modest jobs package, while promising retribution against anyone who stands in his way — by implication Romney, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and the entire GOP congressional leadership.

So, we saw Angry Man again? Making threats? Wow, that’s some great leadership skill you’ve learned, Mr. Obama. What a fantastic way to get people who have different ideas to work with you.

Even the Politico’s Roger Simon sighed over the speech. In a bad way

Another day, another speech. A speech that promised more speeches. And so Barack Obama, who once soared on the wings of hope, now plods on the leaden feet of reality.

The only job Obama is worried about is his own. He has no idea how to create jobs. Certainly, passing the legislation on free trade agreements and patent reform will happen (if Obama has sent them over to Congress as of yet), but, they are not big jobs creators. Passing payroll tax reductions will pass, though it has already been shown that it doesn’t work. The actual spending, though, very doubtful. The GOP led House should take what is left of the Porkulus, and reallocate the money towards programs that actually work.

Obama also wants, shockingly, tax increases on “the rich”. Lead the way, Mr. Obama. Put your money where your mouth is, and send a nice, fat check to the IRS. Tell those campaign donors who pay upwards of $38,000 for a photo with you to instead send the money to the IRS. Walk the talk.

Crossed at Pirate’s Cove. Follow me on Twitter @WilliamTeach.

6
  • Anonymous

    Every bit of this speech was 100% campaign, even the scheduling shenanigans (which backfired).

    The first part was “pass the damn bill”, since apparently more government is the only possible thing that can save the economy.

    The middle blew out the irony meter, with Obama promising to reduce regulations on businesses while not mentioning a word about Obamacare, his EPA, or his avalance of executive orders.

    He topped it off with a bizarre tribute to socialism, trying to undercut conservative counterarguments by claiming that the government is responsible for any and every good thing in America.

    This was supposed to be the Obama-as-advertised…controlling the debate and transcending partisanship. Instead he came off looking petty, arrogant, and in desperate need of some self-awareness.

    • Anonymous

      “Obama promising to reduce regulations on businesses”

      Pure bullshit from the Bullshitter-in-Chief.  Not one damn word about lifting restrictions on the drilling industry and bringing our rigs back from Brazil…which has been estimated to provide a potential one million jobs.

      Make no mistake.  This man wants the destruction of our society as we know it.

      • Toastrider

        Sure as hell seems like it, doesn’t it? He goes out of his way to offend our allies, kowtows to our enemies, and shits all over existing industries in favor of unproven technologies that can’t even pull their own weight yet.

        BTW: I hear the FBI raided Solyndra a day or so ago. Get the popcorn.

        • http://www.thepiratescove.us/ William_Teach

          Yup, they did, and they raiding homes of the CEO and others today. I might do a post on that tomorrow, if nothing else crops up.

  • Anonymous

    Hehe.  The president isn’t to blame for the economy because so many variables contribute to it’s performance that he can’t control; like former president bush who single-handedly destroyed the economy and is entirely to blame for our current problems.

    If this makes sense to you, congrats, you are unhinged. 

    /also don’t tax cuts cause deficits and economic stagnation?  If so why is he proposing those? 

    • Anonymous

      I will give him some credit. I don’t recall hearing the words “I inherited…” anywhere.

      The real conclusion is that he’s committed to swamping the country in permanent debt. He claims the plan is “100% paid for”…but he has to amortize it over a ten year period when the spending is all done at once. And the only “cuts” come from future deficits, not actual cash revenue.

      It’s all a shell game to try and prop up the unemployment rate through 2012 so he can get reelected and then decisively crush the free economy once and for all.

      • TheDarkKnight

        I will give him some credit. I don’t recall hearing the words “I inherited…” anywhere.

        Then it’s a good thing I didn’t watch.. I would’ve had at least 1/2 a bottle of Maker’s Mark left

  • Anonymous

    If he wants to create jobs it’s simple enough.  State publicly that the government will be pro-business from now on and seriously get to work removing regulations/taxes that hinder growth and simplifying the rest in to a simple to understand code.  Time after time this is cited by businesses as a reason for uncertainty in investment.

    On top of that start major cuts in nonessential areas (foreign aid, the arts, the UN, military expenses that can’t be justified, etc).  The tax cut idea is a good one, stick with it.  But cut spending to match it.  Get rid of obama care and instead focus on cutting waste from medicaid/care.  Freeze federal salaries and maybe publicly take a pay cut and encourage congress to do the same.  That won’t amount to much but it will make it easier to begin reigning in to the salaries of other federal officials.  And that will yield quite a bit.

    Get immigration under control (hey we could hire people to patrol the borders!).  And maybe free up money for local government and private business infrastructure development.  Don’t try to run it from the top down, just give decent loans to certain projects (transportation and energy) and offer to cut through the red/green tape to get any decent projects off the ground and running now.

    All this should have been done in the first year.  Now it will probably be too late to see significant results before election time.

    So see ya!

  • Anonymous

    Except for the part about cutting payroll taxes for small businesses, I didn’t really hear anything concrete.  Granted, I’m not very smart and can be a bit inattentive but I mostly heard ‘hurry up and give me my way’ and ‘Congress needs to quit acting like children’. 

    It was the first time I recall him trying to convince us that he had some pride in the country though.

  • Anonymous

    Is the CBO going to try and score his speech? Like everything else, there is nothing concrete to look at. He said 17 times during his speech to pass his bill. What bill? Where is it? Is this another Obamacare where we have to pass it and then find out what is in it?

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      They can’t score it, its just a speech.  It did call for $450 billion in more spending, though, then the president claimed it was all paid for – by calling for congress to find revenue later.

  • Pingback: garment sales worldwide

  • Anonymous

    Angry man?  No, Pres. Obama is just trying to deal with the $10 trillion hangover from 8 yrs of the Bush administration, as Harvard Prof Linda Bilmes described in a Jan 2009 article in Harpers magazine.

    • Anonymous

      Besides Washington which president wasn’t saddled with the decisions of past presidents?

      You make it sound like this is a new thing. 

      And frankly that line is getting a bit stale.  If Bush is still in charge then when exactly does Obamas term kick in?

    • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

      “Obama is just trying to deal with the $10 trillion hangover from 8 yrs of the Bush administration”
       
      Oh, he must be one of those “hair of the dog” guys, who figure the best hangover cure is to get even more drunk. Yeah, it seems to work… until you crash. 

      • Anonymous

        It works until you run out of booze.

        But my neighbor is pretty cool, Mr. Chang, and he promised to loan me free alcohol like forever!

        I have to pay him back at some point that that’s future-Smithwicks problem, not present-Smithwick.

      • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

        Kind of hard to blame Bush for the entire debt, since over 6 trillion of that existed before he was sworn into office.

        • Anonymous

          Bush inherited a debt of about $5 trillion and the first current yr surplus since the Eisenhower administration.  The total US debt when Bush left office was $10+ trillion, not counting the projected deficit of $one trillion when Obama got sworn in.  That make a total debt of $11 trillion, which Obama had no part of.  The conservatives, of course, credit the projected FY-2009 Bush budget deficit to Obama.
          When Reagan took office in Jan, 1981, the total debt was less than $one trillion.  When Reagan left office, the debt was $2.8 trillion, not counting the projected deficit Bush senior inherited.  Reagan had to raise taxes twice to keep the debt increase to “only” $2.8 trillion.  When Clinton left office, surpluses were projected as far as the eye could see. Wall street was worried that US treasuries, the safest and most fluid investment in the world would disappear.  Thank you George Bush for not paying off the US debt with those as far as the eye could see surpluses.

          • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

            So Bush inherited a debt and added $4 trillion to it in 8 years, for which he was rightly attacked by then-candidate Obama. Then Obama inherited a debt and added $4 trillion to it in only 3 years, for which we’re supposed to… thank him? Give him a medal?

          • Anonymous

            I guess you can’t read.  Bush added $5 trillion+ the $one trillion projected deficit when he left office.  So you gotta subtract that FY-2009 projected $one trillion from your claimed $four trillionObama debt.  Yes, $three trillion is bad, but consider the shape the economy was in.  Every private industry job that was created during the Bush administration was gone by the time Obama was sworn in.  The country was in the worst financial condition since the great depression.

          • Anonymous

            Every private industry job that was created during the Bush administration was gone by the time Obama was sworn in.

            And the only person who could possibly be at fault for that is President Bush.

            What? Democratic Congress? What’s that?

          • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/OZBTYQK5MN5SKP6FA6KK4TJOQ4 MichaelAlan

            Execpt for when Obama voted yes for those spending bills.

          • TheDarkKnight

            One of the few times he didn’t vote “Present” I guess…

          • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

            Your numbers are off, but what you’re saying, then, is that when you blamed President Bush for 10 trillion in debt, you were… let’s say, mistaken then?

            I still have to ask though: what exactly makes you condemn debt under President Bush but not care about the even larger debt that President Obama has generated in less time?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Hart/100001365605444 Michelle Hart

            Remind us again commie WHO WROTE & PASSED the FY 2009 budget……..

            That would be the kenyan downgrade you moron!!

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Hart/100001365605444 Michelle Hart

            Thanks for showing everyone how much you need to lie to protect the absolute failure you worship……

    • DrEvil

      So Bush spent too much and revenues were too small which lead to big deficits and a failed presidency.  Obama spends way too much and revenues are way too small which leads to even bigger deficits and a super-terrific magnificently successful presidency?  I guess I’m just not nuanced enough to figure out how Obama, who has double-downed on every bad fiscal policy of the Bush presidency, can be judged as anything less than a colossal failure even when compared to any other American president.

      Have an Evil day 

  • Anonymous

    “..reaffirming his leadership with a credible jobs bill..”
     
    Credible? Has it even been written yet? Sent to the House for debate and vote? At this point, its a collection of (rerun) ideas, theories and wishes… which is to say, certainly not a credible bill in any true sense of the phrase.

    • Anonymous

      This is a common weakness liberals have.  They mistake rhetoric for plans.

      “Things should be better than they are now . . . ” is not a plan.

      “It’s all Bushs fault . . . . ” is not a plan.

      But they consistently present those as valid plans and then get pissy when we don’t put them to a vote. 

  • TheDarkKnight

    his speech accomplished three major goals by reaffirming his leadership with a credible jobs bill

    So a speech is a bill now?

  • TheDarkKnight

    his speech accomplished three major goals by reaffirming his leadership with a credible jobs bill

    So a speech is a bill now?

    • Anonymous

      Well, for leftists intentions are the same thing as results, so I guess it is.

  • Anonymous

    So, President Petulant banged the podium and waved his finger at us.

    Yawn.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Hart/100001365605444 Michelle Hart

    The sum total of kenyan downgrage speaches:

    I will gladly pay you tomorrow for a hamburger today….

  • Pingback: Gertie Whistler

  • Pingback: Divin’ for The King penguin….10 September 11 | adeliemanchot

  • Pingback: runescape forum

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info