European Countries Seizing Private Pensions to Pay Down Debt

Think this can’t happen here?: : The Obama administration is already underway with hearings on rule changes on a “stealth” move to nationalize private pensions. : Baby steps, of course.:  It is being described by proponents such as Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) : as a way to “protect” pensioners from predatory investment brokers.: : 

Dr. Theresa Ghilarducci of the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis, : is being funded to trot around the country to explain why we are all too stupid to manage our own retirement funds and need to have BIG SIS handle it for us, in return for a : government annuity-to-be-named-later. : : Right now, the idea would be to have people “voluntarily” move their private pension savings to a government account. (U.S. News’ James Pethokoukis calls her “the most dangerous woman in America” )

Teresa Ghilarducci is touting government take-over of private pension funds

For now, heed what has already happened in Argentina and what is underway in Hungary, Bulgaria, Poland, Ireland and France. : Notice that these countries have : all had “interim” steps to nationalization.:  In addition to seizing private pensions, Hungary has also raised eyebrows by instituting $1 million fines against media outlets which are deemed to be offering “unbalanced” (read: critical of the government) news coverage.: :  There is blowback from the Hungarian public, but will it be too little, too late?

Adam Smith Institute Blog at CSM:

By Jan Iwanik, guest blogger

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban defends government take-over of private pensions despite criticism

People’s retirement savings are a convenient source of revenue for governments that don’t want to reduce spending or make privatizations. As most pension schemes in Europe are organised by the state, European ministers of finance have a facilitated access to the savings accumulated there, and it is only logical that they try to get a hold of this money for their own ends. In recent weeks I have noted five such attempts: Three situations concern private personal savings; two others refer to national funds.

The most striking example is Hungary, where last month the government made the citizens an offer they could not refuse. They could either remit their individual retirement savings to the state, or lose the right to the basic state pension (but still have an obligation to pay contributions for it). In this extortionate way, the government wants to gain control over $14bn of individual retirement savings.

The Bulgarian government has come up with a similar idea. $300m of private early retirement savings was supposed to be transferred to the state pension scheme. The government gave way after trade unions protested and finally only about 20% of the original plans were implemented.

A slightly less drastic situation is developing in Poland. The government wants to transfer of 1/3 of future contributions from individual retirement accounts to the state-run social security system. Since this system does not back its liabilities with stocks or even bonds, the money taken away from the savers will go directly to the state treasury and savers will lose about $2.3bn a year. The Polish government is more generous than the Hungarian one, but only because it wants to seize just 1/3 of the future savings and also allows the citizens to keep the money accumulated so far.

The fourth example is Ireland. In 2001, the National Pension Reserve Fund was brought into existence for the purpose of supporting pensions of the Irish people in the years 2025-2050. The scheme was also supposed to provide for the pensions of some public sector employees (mainly university staff). However, in March 2009, the Irish government earmarked €4bn from this fund for rescuing banks. In November 2010, the remaining savings of €2.5bn was seized to support the bailout of the rest of the country.

The final example is France. In November, the French parliament decided to earmark €33bn from the national reserve pension fund FRR to reduce the short-term pension scheme deficit. In this way, the retirement savings intended for the years 2020-2040 will be used earlier, that is in the years 2011-2024, and the government will spend the saved up resources on other purposes.

It looks like although the governments are able to enforce general participation in pension schemes, they do not seem to be the best guardians of the money accumulated there.

The table below is a summary of the discussed fiscal-retirement situations (source):

*These figures do not include the costs of higher taxes, price inflation and low interest rates, which additionally devaluate retirement savings.

[This article was originally posted at mises.pl]

See also:
IPE::  Analysis of Hungarian take-over by Thomas Escritt

Here is discussion from last November by Bloomberg about pending take-over

Cross-posted on UNCOVERAGE.net

Leave a Comment

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!

Send this to a friend