I Want A Sweep

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

I Want A Sweep

Written By : Melissa Clouthier

How likely do you think a sweep will happen? That is, how likely will the GOP win in VA, NJ and NY 23?

Jack Schite

How's about the dems just give you a good cleaning instead.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Someone please ban this stupid troll.
Chris_RC

Didn't the Republican candidate pull out of NY23, endorsing the Democrat? Given that, I don't think the GOP will win.
http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

Posted by Chris_RC

You didn't happen to actually look at the poll did you, Chris? Because it says quite clearly "(conservative candidate)". One more time for the kids in the back of the class who're not paying attention – Republican does not equal conservative.
Raposa

I'd settle for a sweep in VA. McDonnell, Bolling, Cuchinelli.
http://www.allthatisnecessary.com jjmurphy

(With apologies to Conan The Barbarian)

Palin: "What is best in life?"

Conservative voters: "To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."

I want a sweep, too.
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

The truth is, any election that's close means that the Democrat wins, its been true for decades (except for President Bush, who knows how to fight). That means unless the non Democrats win by 5+ points, they lose.
aharris

I want a sweep, but I'm afraid that the NJ race will be close enough that they'll stall long enough to manufacture the needed fraudulent votes a la the Al Franken approach.
Chris_RC

Exactly my point. The poll question was

"How likely do you think a sweep will happen? That is, how likely will the GOP win in VA, NJ and NY 23?"

Conservative is not Republican, therefore, the GOP isn't winning the NY23.
http://www.conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/ reelman

WHY DEMOCRATS ARE LOSING

Despite the talking points and Bill O missing the mark (HC Bill reason) we need only look at recent political history.

The obvious (glaringly) achilles heels of past democrat (aka secular socialist) presidents have been the economy and foreign policy.

Obama is a radical (not a liberal) so his performance in these areas has been worse than bad….just awful to be kind.

The trillions in new debt, the failure (DEMOCRAT congress since Jan. 2007) to stop job losses and the "bash blame America" rants do not make voters whose retirement funds are still six figures down after all the lofty platitudes (and serial blameshifting) the least bit happy.

Patriotism is not Party-specific. IRAs are not Party-specific. Pink slips are not Party-specific. Smiles and promises get stale. Blaming others gets stale. Trashing America gets stale. None of the Obama ploys pays your bills or gets you a job. Ten percent jobless is NEVER acceptable.

This voter attitude is based upon self-interest. The socialists will have their strawmen and talking points but the meltdown has only begun.

The HC Bill ($1.2 trillion) and Cap-N-Tax (trillions in new taxes) added to other (on the table) huge new taxes while letting tax cuts expire (to shrink paychecks) just means the voter anger will become a fiery rage.

Mark it. Bet on it. Ignore the distractions.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
GDR

Here is a great article on how your personal liberty and freedom have a great deal to do with the quality of the Health Care you receive:

http://andrews.blogtownhall.com/2009/11/03/public…

Yes, liberty does really matter in the real world and not just in the abstract…

And if a conservative or Republican politicans can't articulate this in terms people can understand then shame on them – its not that hard to explain or grasp…