Is Sarah Palin Running For President? It Sure Looks Like It.

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Is Sarah Palin Running For President? It Sure Looks Like It.

Written By : John Hawkins

Of course, it’s impossible to say for sure what Sarah Palin is going to do in 2012, but it’s hard to miss the fact that she seems to be laying the groundwork for a run at the presidency.

Consider the facts.

* She probably needed to be heavily involved in national political issues and campaigns to have a chance to win in 2012. However, she couldn’t do either of those things as governor of Alaska. So, she resigned.

* Palin managed to help rehabilitate her image with voters around the country with her book tour.

* She’s having a major impact on the national debate with her Facebook posts. She personally influenced the outcome of the health care debate with her death panel comments.

* She’s getting out to a wider audience via her spot on Fox News.

* She burnished her outsider credentials and appealed to anti-establishment conservatives by supporting Doug Hoffman in NY-23.

* She’s speaking at multiple tea parties to help cement that part of the base in her camp.

* Her PAC has been raising money that she’ll dole out to candidates during the 2010 primary season.

* She endorsed Rand Paul in the Kentucky Republican primary. Why? Well, what better way to appeal to Ron Paul’s fans without getting entangled with the man himself?

* Palin’s endorsement of John McCain came early, before JD Hayworth got in the race, and may very well have been in return for Johnny Mac’s endorsement in 2012. Like him or not, McCain has a lot of influence with moderates in the party and having him support her instead of Romney or Pawlenty would be very helpful.

Now, does all of this mean that Palin’s running in 2012? Not necessarily. She still needs to raise her approval numbers a little more while fighting the impression that she’s not experienced enough for the job. If the time came to make a decision and she just didn’t think she could pull off a victory, Palin could always wait another 4-8 years for her chance. That being said, more than anyone else — more than Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and Tim Pawlenty — Sarah Palin is doing all the things that you’d expect from a 2012 contender at this point.

Pingback: ANYTHING INTERESTING | ANYTHING INTERESTING
Jack Schite

Her PAC has spent most of it’s money on Palon’s book.

Palin for precident! ;)
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Her PAC has spent most of it’s money on Palon’s book.

Palin for precident! ;)
Posted by Jack Schite
2010-02-03 09:29:24

Complete lie from a liar. Thanks for playing. Go fuck your rubber doll and call it your wife for us, you f’n liar.
CoolCzech

I keep waiting for Palin to give some brilliant interview where she blows away every doubt anyone ever had about her. Unfortunately… I’m still waiting. Don’t get me wrong, I like the woman – and she certainly couldn’t be a worse President than President Spock has turned out to be.

Still, I continue to harbor doubts about her – does she have the depth of knowledge to be a first rate President?

That said,

Here’s the Facts of Life: at present, Palin would wipe the floor with any other Republican out there during the primaries.

And,

At the rate President Spock is crashing, the Republicans could nominate Rin Tin Tin the Wonder Dog in 2012 and win.

Draw your own conclusions.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Palin for precident! ;)
Posted by Jack Schite
2010-02-03 09:29:24

Looks like somebody’s PhD was a waste of time. Who did you have to sleep with to get it?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by CoolCzech
2010-02-03 10:13:55

Nixon thinks the average ordinary AMerican is getting tired of the Ivy League brilliant orators running the country into the dirt (see Obama). Palin has been effective in her political life because of who and what she is, a ordinary American with solid convictions and common sense. The well educated buffooon we have as POTUS has fallen on his ass. Anyone who claims Palin would not be a better POTUS than Obama is not thinking very well.
whats_up

Posted by Jack Schite
2010-02-03 09:29:24

Jack,

They only spent $65000 on her book, the problem is that Palin herself then gets 6500 in royalties, that could be a problem unless addressed.
StanInTexas

the problem is that Palin herself then gets 6500 in royalties, that could be a problem unless addressed.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 10:53:52

You have a problem with an author getting royalties on the books they write? Why do you hate Capitalism so, crthns?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

that could be a problem unless addressed.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 10:53:52

Actually, there is no problem or scandal, except in the fevered minds of Keith Olberman and ABC.
whats_up

You have a problem with an author getting royalties on the books they write? Why do you hate Capitalism so, crthns?

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 10:57:52

Stan,

I dont, except when it is her own PAC paying her.
StanInTexas

I dont, except when it is her own PAC paying her.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 11:02:32

They didn’t. They bought her book, for which she is compensated with royalties. Simple and no problem.
whats_up

They didn’t. They bought her book, for which she is compensated with royalties. Simple and no problem.

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 11:05:32

Then you would no problem with any Politicans PAC say buying 3 or 4 million dollars worth of said politicians book and then that politician pocketing said royalties. That is really the box that you want opened? Just clarifying.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 11:25:18

Is anything that happened with SarahPac buying a few thousand copies of her back to send to donors to said PAC against a law?

Yes or no would be nice. You can move the goal posts later.
StanInTexas

Just clarifying.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 11:25:18

Oh, so we’ve upped it to 3-4 MILLION? How about instead of throwing out idiocy masked in hyperbole, you address the issue.

Is there anything illegal with an author getting paid royalties for the books they write, YES or NO?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

book not back.
whats_up

Is there anything illegal with an author getting paid royalties for the books they write, YES or NO?

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 11:29:09

No their isnt, nor have I ever claimed that Stan. What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 11:35:35

Then you should write your congressman.
Have a special day.
StanInTexas

What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 11:35:35

HORSESHIT!

You have a problem with Sarah Palin and are trying to turn this into a situation that requires an investigation. If this were a discussion about the DNC buying warehouses full of Barak Obama’s book, you would beon the opposite side of the issue, claiming that there is nothign illegal about the purchase and that Conservatives were racists for even bringing it up.

There is nothing illegal about this, so let it drop.
whats_up

There is nothing illegal about this, so let it drop.

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 11:39:51

I wasnt aware that you were so versed in campaign finance law covering PAC’s. Please tell us exactly where we can find this information to verify your claim, oh thats right you cant. Fuckin imbecile
StanInTexas

I wasnt aware that you were so versed in campaign finance law covering PAC’s. Please tell us exactly where we can find this information to verify your claim, oh thats right you cant. Fuckin imbecile
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 11:47:21

If you think there is something illegal about what the PAC did with Palin’s book, THEN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Otherwise, you are just bitching to be a bitch. So shut up!
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Is there anything illegal with an author getting paid royalties for the books they write, YES or NO?

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 11:29:09

No their isnt, nor have I ever claimed that Stan. What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 11:35:35

I wasnt aware that you were so versed in campaign finance law covering PAC’s. Please tell us exactly where we can find this information to verify your claim, oh thats right you cant. Fuckin imbecile
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 11:47:21

Talking out both sides of your mouth and there is the proof. If Stan is a imbicile for pointing out that you said this isn’t illegal, what does that make you, sockpuppet bitch?
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.

Why?
whats_up

Why?

Posted by CavalierX
2010-02-03 12:07:23

Because they are paying themselves with PAC money. You dont have a problem with any politician doing this? Why would you think this is okay to do?
StanInTexas

Because they are paying themselves with PAC money.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 12:20:01

You have already admitted that nothing is illegal here and you have no clue if this is any sort of payoff.

The ONLY reason you even care about this is because it is Palin. Your fear and loathing of here is transparent and obvious. So just stop bitching about this. No matter how much you whine, nothing will come of it.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Because they are paying themselves with PAC money.

Unfortunately for you, this is not what happened. Again, your fevered mind is stretching it’s limited abilities.
Thanks for playing.
whats_up

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 12:28:29

You’re right there Stan, probably nothing will come of it, however it shows alot about character, you know integrity that kind of thing. Things conservatives preach about but just cant find a way to live by.
Bildo

Her PAC buying a large number of her books is probably illegal. It’s what brought down former Speaker Jim Wright, and if I remember correctly, Newt Gingrich as well. If you want to run for office, don’t use contributor funds to buy your book.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

it shows alot about character, you know integrity that kind of thing. Things conservatives preach about but just cant find a way to live by.
Posted by whats_up

Not breaking the law shows character and integrity is lacking in Palin?

Nice strawman. Keep beating it for a while longer, if you will.
Mike_M

If we want to talk about corruption and skirting the law we can talk about Hillary’s multi-million dollar advances from big media companies on her ghost-written books.

But the issue here is Palin for President. The one thing she really still needs is some foreign policy cred. That may be hard to come by with the Dems in power since the government won’t be doing her any favors.

She has about a year, so her best bet would be to try and get into a think tank or possibly a government panel dealing with policy issues. Something like the Iraq Study Group would be ideal if the chance arose. Something like a global energy tour wouldn’t be a bad idea. She could travel to Brazil and meet with private and public officials about ethanol and their huge oil discoveries, then to Germany to talk about realistic uses of wind and solar power. It would make more sense than some phony photo-op with a foreign leader when she’s no longer an elected representative.
CoolCzech

What I do have a problem with is any politicians PAC buying their own book.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 11:35:35

The book is being used as an incentive to encourage higher-dollar donations. As far as the $6,500 in royalties,

a) We don’t know the terms of Palin’s book deal, so you don’t know how much her royalties are, and

b) You don’t know the terms of the contract to purchase the copies in question. She may well have waved any royalties associated with them in order to buy the copies at a cheaper price, since her main objective wasn’t to boost her 2 million + sales figure, but to encourage donations. Cheaper price per copy = more books to buy to use as incentives.

This is really a non-story.
Bildo

Newt’s ethical violations stemmed from misuse of tax exempt funds. I was wrong on that count. Jim Wright’s ethical violations involved third parties buying large quantities of his book in order to bypass contribution limits.

Palin will most likely have to answer some pretty serious questions about this PAC book purchase.
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

I hope not, I don’t want her to run for president. I think she’s much more effective as a public voice and presence forcing attention on conservative issues and giving a conservative alternative to the narrative forced on us by the legacy media.

Jim Wright’s ethical violations involved third parties buying large quantities of his book in order to bypass contribution limits.

Same thing happened with Hillary Clinton but nobody investigated that.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Because they are paying themselves with PAC money. You dont have a problem with any politician doing this? Why would you think this is okay to do?

Are you saying that politicians should be forced by law to donate copies of their book to their PACs for distribution, free of charge? Good luck getting that passed.
CoolCzech

By the way, anyone that doubts her personal political power – as a private person, with no office or stage save for her facebook posts – look how devastating her “death panel” post was to Obamacare. Hell, even Rahmbo feels the sting of her wrath – he’s crawling on his knees to the Special Olympics Committee, seek absolution like some medieval monarch from the Pope.

Anyone think he would feel to do so, except for Palin’s post?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Palin will most likely have to answer some pretty serious questions about this PAC book purchase.
Posted by Bildo
2010-02-03 13:05:57

She is not a elected official. Newt and Wright were.
Tom_pinko_Delay

So the “death panel” post was her exercising her political power? And you are celebrating this complete distortion of the truth as something positive?

Please please please nominate her. Obama will win hands down.
CoolCzech

Tom,

a) Regardless of your view of it, the Death Panel Post certainly WAS an exercise of her political power, and what a wallop it packed! It was the Deathblow to Soviet-style Medicine.

Damned STRAIGHT I consider the demise of Deathcare to be something positive. Damned, what a bullet this nation narrowly dodged!

b) What exactly was the “distortion”? Didn’t Harry Reid’s bill include provisions for Panels to meet out Life-or-Death decisions about what sort of treatment would be available, to whom they would be available? Didn’t he expect its decisions to be so horrific, he wanted to make them virtually unchallengeable (requiring a supermajority of the Congress to overturn)?

Sorry, but Huckleberry Hound could wipe the floor with Obama in 2012. Palin is the most energizing figure in American politics at the moment, and no one will be more energized than American conservatives come 2012. Now, 3 years is a long ways off, and things can change. But where things are at this very moment – I think the Presidency would be Palin’s for the asking if she wanted it.
Bildo

Posted by Dick_Nixon
2010-02-03 13:11:35

“She is not a elected official. Newt and Wright were.”

True, but PACs are politically regulated since their entire purpose is political. Also, we’re talking about her running for office in this thread. If she chooses to run, legal or not, expect a lot of questions to be raised.

Remember, the playing field isn’t level. What Hillary can do without question, Palin will spend two years having to explain and defend. While I like Palin, I think she’s politically damaged. Her image is a lot better now, but she’s a long way from being a viable candidate. I wish we could find someone better, but Pawlenty, Romney, and Huckabee[shudder], are all jokes. I rank Ron Paul up there with Obama as a desirable President.
Tom_pinko_Delay

Cliched, hackneyed and trite, Murray.

Please come back when you are capable of carrying on a debate at an adult level. It’s just boring for everyone involved if you won’t.
Tom_pinko_Delay

No one gives a shit, Murray. Try to stay on topic.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by Tom_pinko_Delay
2010-02-03 14:07:02

May Nixon quote you on that?
Tom_pinko_Delay

How so, Murray? She connects with the base, sure, but not at all with the moderates. I don’t see her getting any of the independent vote.
StanInTexas

Posted by Bildo 2010-02-03 13:05:57

Small correction, Bildo.

Jim Wright’s ethical violations were because his staff compiled the contents of the book on government time, AND the book was ONLY purchased by the third parties.

This issue is about Palin and a not-so-subtle attempt by the Left to continue to throw things at her, hoping something will get traction. Tom-IDIOT-Delay may say he wants her to run, but the bulk of the Liberals in this country are expending a huge amount of energy to discredit a supposed “sure loser” os a candidate.

Their whines are panic!
Tom_pinko_Delay

The banned troll from Texas is correct. Why are we wasting any energy trying to discredit her. Just put the microphone in front of her and let her do it all by herself:

COURIC: And when it comes to establishing your world view, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this — to stay informed and to understand the world?

PALIN: I’ve read most of them again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media —

COURIC: But what ones specifically? I’m curious.

PALIN: Um, all of them, any of them that have been in front of me over all these years.
StanInTexas

Posted by Tom_pinko_Delay 2010-02-03 14:41:14

I truly hope every Liberal in America is as stupid as you are Tom. Basing a person’s entire political career on one hostile interview?

Wadda Maroon!
CoolCzech

Liberals knew that Palin would be a formidable POTUS candidate from the moment they laid eyes on her at the Republican Convention. They’ve been desperately trying to discredit & belittle her ever since… when anyone with half a brain in their head can see their best bet would have been simply to ignore her.

No, their very dismissal of her and smearing of her helped turn her into the formidable national figure she is today.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Why are we wasting any energy trying to discredit her. Just put the microphone in front of her and let her do it all by herself:

Yeah Tom. It’s a good thing that Palin never said that the US had 57 states or witnessed fallen heroes in a given crowd. As you know, NOBODY would be stupid enough to say that, correct? You would never have voted for someone if they did say those things.

Did Obama finally lower the seas?

Did that finally shut your fucking pie hole?
CoolCzech

Tom, are you in ALL honesty trying to tell us you don’t believe Palin ever heard of the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal and USA Today? I mean, really?

What that interview, and other times when an interviewer put her on the spot, indicated to me wasn’t that she never reads papers, but that she isn’t particularly fast when put on the spot – and I would count that as a strike against her. That’s why I reserve final judgment on her.
CoolCzech

“Why are we wasting any energy trying to discredit her.”

Because you fear and obsess over her. That’s why.
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

You know what’s hilarious? Watching Democrats and fans of President Obama (less experience than Sarah Palin) attack her for being stupid and tangle tongued and ignoring the actual Vice President Joe Biden.

Like Ace says every time Biden opens his idiot hole, man we really dodged a bullet not having her as actual VP huh?
StanInTexas

Like Ace says every time Biden opens his idiot hole, man we really dodged a bullet not having her as actual VP huh?
Posted by Christopher_Taylor 2010-02-03 15:01:37

This past Presidential election proved an old adage:
Republican Presidential candidates choose a running-mate that will enhance the ticket and provide a winning team.
Democrat Presidential candidates choose a running-mate that will make sure would-be assassins think twice about killing him.
Tom_pinko_Delay

Tom, are you in ALL honesty trying to tell us you don’t believe Palin ever heard of the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal and USA Today? I mean, really?

No, I don’t think she’s never heard of those publications. I just can’t fathom why shouldn’t wouldn’t answer the question. As it is a fair one. Is she had answered Mother Jones and DailyKos, I’m sure people would want to know that, right?

she isn’t particularly fast when put on the spot – and I would count that as a strike against her. That’s why I reserve final judgment on her.

Thanks for your honesty.

Yeah Tom. It’s a good thing that Palin never said that the US had 57 states or witnessed fallen heroes in a given crowd.

You really can’t tell the difference between those 2 Bush-like gaffes and a straight up refusal to answer a question about where the VP candidate gets her news from? That’s clown-ish, even by your standards, Kingfisher.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

You really can’t tell the difference between those 2 Bush-like gaffes and a straight up refusal to answer a question about where the VP candidate gets her news from? That’s clown-ish, even by your standards, Kingfisher.

Nice deflection Tom but, as murray says, you’re a pothead.

It’s interesting that, to libs, anything stated by a Democrat is a misquote while anything stated by a Republican is a sign of inferiority.

Palin’s statement is nothing new. I’ve changed publications I’ve read over the years, not because of their political stance but because of the topics that are discussed. I’ve migrated to more Internet-based publications over the past years.

I don’t focus on any one specific publication because my job requires knowledge from many sources. If you asked me which specific publications I read, my first question would be for which type of information I would be seeking.

You’re claiming that Palin is unqualified simply because she cannot recall which publications she reads offhand. So what? Please provide detailed information on how the citizens of Alaska benefit by her offhand knowledge of publicans she reads.

The real question is how much she knows about foreign affairs. I know more from RWN than from Time, Newsweek and many newspapers combined.

Thank you for proving yourself as a Palin-hating pothead.

No, I don’t think she’s never heard of those publications. I just can’t fathom why shouldn’t wouldn’t answer the question.

So you’re acknowledging that she is aware of the publicans but chastising her because she couldn’t recall them from memory at a given time. That’s called a “contradiction,” Tom.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

You really can’t tell the difference between those 2 Bush-like gaffes

Don’t worry Tom. Right now, the American people have forgotten Bush and are now focused on the “Obama-like” or “Biden-like” gaffes. That proves that you’re dumb as shit when choosing a candidate.

Keep on smokin’ that weed.
Tom_pinko_Delay

Pothead, Kingfisher?

Where are you getting your information from, Murray? The guy who just got banned and is getting his posts deleted?

Nice company you keep.

The real question is how much she knows about foreign affairs.

Agreed. Which is why it was disturbing that she wouldn’t answer the question.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Where are you getting your information from, Murray? The guy who just got banned and is getting his posts deleted?

May Nixon quote you?
StanInTexas

Agreed. Which is why it was disturbing that she wouldn’t answer the question.
Posted by Tom_pinko_Delay 2010-02-03 15:42:03

It is still hard to imagine that you are are STILL basing your opinion of Palin on ONE question from ONE openly hostile interview. And that is coupled with your casual dismissal of all the mind-numbingly STUPID things candidate Obama said, and did, and lied about.

Like I said, Tom… I hope all the Liberals as as stupid as you are. And judging from the vitrol being throw at Palin and her children, it is safe to say that they are.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Where are you getting your information from, Murray? The guy who just got banned and is getting his posts deleted?

Or the idiot like you who never proves what you claim? Some of Murray’s posts still exist.

Agreed. Which is why it was disturbing that she wouldn’t answer the question.

Actually, she did answer the question. You have to result to personal attacks because you hate people who don’t share your political views. You even admitted that you’re sure she knows of the various publications so this is a desperate attempt to malign someone for no reason. Why all the hate?

Alaska is one of the states that has a relatively good fiscal budget but actual accomplishments mean nothing to you. You’re basing what magazines a person reads while I judge their performance. Obama reads a lot of good magazines and he’s a failure. I bet you read a lot of magazines too and you’re a failure as well. What’s your poitn?
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

It is still hard to imagine that you are are STILL basing your opinion of Palin on ONE question from ONE openly hostile interview.

Personally, I really don’t think the interview was that hostile although I can see why it would be considered that way.

Tom is like those conspiracy theorists who look for any little tidbit so they can claim it supports their theory. If Palin answered the question to Tom’s satisfaction, Tom’s next response would be, “Yeah, but what about THIS?” OK, Palin didn’t answer the question, whoop-de-frickin-doo! Obama never provided similar answers off-the-cuff, the press always gave him plenty of time to respond to their questions, big deal.

Obama is considered enlightened and yet, has lied numerous times and has accomplished nothing, even after $1 trillion. Palin doesn’t answer a question to their satisfaction and suddenly, she’s not qualified.

Tom, do me a favor and keep repeating your anti-Palin tirade. As Twain once said, “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.” You, Tom, prove Mark Twain right every time you post.
whats_up

Alaska is one of the states that has a relatively good fiscal budget but actual accomplishments mean nothing to you.

Posted by Kingfisher
2010-02-03 15:52:22

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
StanInTexas

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 16:00:36

This explains a lot about you, crthns. If you think that returning money to the taxpayers is socialism, I can see whhy you refuse to beleive Obama ia a Socialist.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:00:36

Uh-huh, sure. Did your underage gay boyfriend tell you that?
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:00:36

Um, whats_up, even if I took that statement at face value, you apparently fail to understand that is NOT socialism.

You don’t even understand the definition of socialism. How fucking stupid are you? Why don’t you look up the definition of ‘socialism’ and get back to us?

Thank you for proving your intellectual inferiority.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:00:36

Sure thing fruit boy. Your post is a complete lie btw.
whats_up

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 16:04:16

Stan,

They dont return all the money to the people, and spreading the wealth is now not socialist, since when?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

They dont return all the money to the people, and spreading the wealth is now not socialist, since when?
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:46:09

threadjack. And false.
whats_up

Um, whats_up, even if I took that statement at face value, you apparently fail to understand that is NOT socialism.

Posted by Kingfisher
2010-02-03 16:07:44

Really, then perhaps we should tell all business that 25% of the revenue they make from sales goes back to the people, would you support that?
StanInTexas

They dont return all the money to the people, and spreading the wealth is now not socialist, since when?
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 16:46:09

You are goping to have to get your lies together, crthns.

First, the state takes the profits (LIE) and gives them back to the people. Now you are saying they don’t return all the money?

Take a minute and figure out which lie you want to tell next!
whats_up

threadjack. And false.

Posted by Dick_Nixon
2010-02-03 16:47:51

Totally true Nixon, not all the money is returned to the citizens.
StanInTexas

Posted by whats_up 2010-02-03 16:48:14

And for extra points, what_up, pleae tell us how the State of Alaska TOOK profits from a private oil company.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Isnt it interesting that Alasks fisical budget actually takes profits from Oil companies and gives them back to the people. How socialist of them.
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:00:36

This is incorrect. Crthns, please learn to fucking reply to the correct post, you dumb mother fucker.
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Alaska takes nothing from companies. They charge royalties for those companies to pump ALASKAN owned oil, and those companies pay taxes on their operations in Alaska.

Crthns, go back to pumping your meat over gay kid pron and leave this discussion, which you have been proven wrong at the top, to more qualified people.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Really, then perhaps we should tell all business that 25% of the revenue they make from sales goes back to the people, would you support that?
Posted by whats_up
2010-02-03 16:48:14

Judging from:

1) The amount of your posts, and
2) The fact that you did not respond to me directly

Shows that you looked up “socialism” in the dictionary, realized that you were wrong and am now pathetically attempting to deflect the issue.

When you prove your statement then I’ll respond, otherwise, I’ll accept your defeat.
StanInTexas

When you prove your statement then I’ll respond, otherwise, I’ll accept your defeat.
Posted by Kingfisher 2010-02-03 17:07:48

Either crthns is furiously googling, trying to find a definition of socialism to match what he posted…

*OR*

He realized he lied and is unable to answer the questions put to him, and has run away again.

But fear not, King. He will return tomorrow, arrogane and pompous as always, insisting he won this and every other debate on this board.
Tom_pinko_Delay

You still have not replied to my 15:02 post, which is still visible.

Wonder why that is…
Posted by MurraytheMiser
2010-02-03 17:01:49

Well, it didn’t seem like it needed a response. I say that she won’t get the moderates. You think she will.

Also, weren’t you banned? what are you still doing here?
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

what are you still doing here?
Posted by Tom_pinko_Delay
2010-02-03 17:28:20

I’ll quote you on that.
Pingback: Is Sarah Palin Running For President? | NewsReal Blog
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Also, weren’t you banned? what are you still doing here?
Posted by Tom_pinko_Delay
2010-02-03 17:28:20

The trolls frequent here on a daily basis and you’re worried about Murray? Obviously, your outrage is very selective.
whats_up

insisting he won this and every other debate on this board.

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-02-03 17:16:35

Stan,

Thats because when I debate you imbeciles it is too easy. If you dont like getting your ass kicked educate yourself a little, its not hard.
StanInTexas

Thats because when I debate you imbeciles it is too easy. If you dont like getting your ass kicked educate yourself a little, its not hard.
Posted by whats_up 2010-02-04 10:32:20

And how long does it take for you to create the pathetic little fantasy world you live in?

Any idea yet how the State of Alaska TAKES profits from a privatly held corporation?
Jack Schite

Stain in Texas wrote:
Democrat Presidential candidates choose a running-mate that will make sure would-be assassins think twice about killing him

you are a sad sack of Texas sized shit , Stain.

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”

Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth

Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers

The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation

The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans

Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN