For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Biodiversity, the Left’s Next Big Hoax
Written By : Dave Blount

Rebranding global warming as “climate change” won’t keep the dying hoax alive; too many people have caught on that it’s a lie. It’s time for our moonbat rulers to invent a new crisis in an attempt to justify their never-ending war on our freedom and wealth. Biodiversity might work:

With all the shamelessness of a Goldman Sachser trading in his middle-aged wife for a hot, pouting twentysomething called Ivanka, the green movement is ditching “Climate Change”. The newer, younger, sexier model’s name? Biodiversity. …

When I say shameless, I’m talking so amoral it makes the Whore of Babylon look like Mother Theresa; so flagrant it makes Al Gore’s, ahem, alleged drunken “Love poodle” assault on the Portland Masseuse look like an especially delicate passage from Andreas Capellanus’s The Art of Courtly Love.

Liberals will eagerly buy anything with “diversity” in the name without looking at the price tag. The rest of us are in for some sticker shock. Like the debunked global warming hoax, biodiversity involves the insatiably greedy United Nations taking money from you and passing it out among socialist dictators in places like Africa:

Developing nations say more funding is needed from developed countries to share the effort in saving nature. Much of the world’s remaining biological diversity is in developing nations such as Brazil, Indonesia and in central Africa.

“Especially for countries with their economies in transition, we need to be sure where the (financial) resources are,” Eng. B.T. Baya, director-general of Tanzania’s National Environment Management Council, told Reuters.

Baya knows perfectly well where the financial resources are: in your bank account. Comrade Obama will be more than happy to move them from there to Baya’s on behalf of the three-toed bat-winged ground sloth, or whatever huggable doe-eyed creature the media is hyping at the moment.

Climate change had the advantage that the climate never stops changing. Similarly, species never stop going extinct. Only a tiny percentage of the species that have existed are still around today. Meanwhile,

Despite the U.N.’s fear that biodiversity may be at risk, scientists over the past decade have identified new species at an unprecedented rate. The 2008 World Wildlife Fund (WWF) study First Contact in the Greater Mekong reported that 1,068 species were discovered or newly identified by science between 1997 and 2007 — averaging two new species a week. And the Census of Marine Life — an ambitious, 10-year project to catalog the diversity of the world’s oceans — recently concluded, having identified more than 6,000 potentially new ocean-going species.

Information like this will soon become scarce, as biologists, like climate scientists, are compelled to become political hacks in exchange for lucrative government grants.

In case it isn’t obvious that this is a cheesy sequel to A Convenient Lie, Japanese Environment Minister Ryu Matsumoto ominously intones,

“We are nearing a tipping point, or the point of no return for biodiversity loss.”

The dreaded tipping point is once again upon us! Grab hold of your wallet with both hands.

Biodiversity.jpg
Compliments of Stormfax.

On a tip from J. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

0
  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    Survival of the fittest only applies to the past, everything present needs to stay exactly as it is right now without any changes whatsoever.

  • Anonymous

    It is a good idea I have to admit.

    All you have to do is estimate the number of species that ‘ought’ to be in an area if people weren’t around. Then count the actual number and subtract. The entire difference can be attributed to mankind.

    With the weather they often to get caught by people who have actual thermometers. But who seriously goes out and counts all the different species in their neighborhood?

    Quite clever.

  • Kingfisher

    Now that scientists have discovered a ‘liberal gene’ I recommend that we begin a marketing campaign to ‘eliminate’ the liberal gene in order to save the planet.

    We’ll be killing two birds with one stone. ;-)

  • Martha

    Just as global warming has never been debunked, so the more detailed explanation of the effects of global warming are welcome. Kudos to the image the which shows the way of the future.

    • StanW

      What does the food taste like in the world you live, Spammer?

      Man-Made global warming is false, and your side has to lie about it even to keep it in the news. Even your Prophet AlGore doesn’t really beleive in it, he only does it for the money and fame.

      • Martha

        Umm- food tastes great – as it should. With a nice bottle of the proper accompaniment. Man-made global warming is true – as you well know (I keep telling ya to stand in that closed garage with a running car for a couple of hours. Please?) Odd about that Al Gore – I thought he already had money and fame.

        • StanW

          Your proof that MMGW is real is a closed garage and a running car?

          You make this too easy, Spammer.

          • Martha

            Aww, stan, try it just for me. Pul-eeze. Then come and tell me I’m wrong. {heheh}

          • StanW

            You’re wrong, AS ALWAYS. But if you feel so strongly about it, then you prove it. Do your little experiment and let us know how it goes.

          • Martha

            Why, stan, do you concede my experiment proves my point. Gee – thanks. Still, I would rather you offer the proof.

          • StanW

            A running car in a garage proves NOTHING other than your abject stupidity.

            But the experiment is yours, Spammer. If you want to know if it is a true representation, then try it yourself.

          • Anonymous

            And this right here is why we don’t take your side seriously.This is how you understand the scientific method.To you it consists of:1) coming to a conclusion2) demanding the opposition disprove it to your satisfaction.3) should they fail to do so claim success. If they do, then call them heretics and work to censor them.

          • Martha

            Oh, I know what will happen to stan in his garage. It has been tested and proved. stan is the one who claims it won’t work.

          • Anonymous

            The sad thing is when Gore tried that experiment to test global warming for himself he just ended up with severe brain damage due to oxygen depletion.

            That was right before he made his movie and went on this global warming crusade.

            I wonder if there is a correlation there?

          • StanW

            No coorelation at all, Smith. Because there was no differentce between pre-experiment Gore and post-experiment Gore.

        • Proud Infidel

          Manmade global warming is true like tidal waves are caused by whale farts!

    • Anonymous

      That’s a fairly big admission right there.

      Moving from “the science is settled!” to “not completely debunked yet”.

      • Martha

        Since I have used neither phrase, I but ponder what the hell you’re talking about. But – I promise – I won’t ponder too long. Better things to do – like a planet to save.

    • Proud Infidel

      You lose again.
      Try again.
      Try harder, and lay off the glue-sniffing before you do!

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    You know, for people who believe in evolution, eco-weenies don’t seem to have much faith in the actual process of evolution when push comes to shove. After all, one of the principal tenets of the process of evolution is that species adapt to fill ecological niches vacated by other species which have died out. So isn’t it reasonable for us to believe that as species die out, other species will adapt to create new species which exploit the eco-niches left empty?

    Or, in the eyes of the eco-weenies, is this too important an issue to be left to the vagaries of nature and Mother Gaia herself?

    • Martha

      When push comes to shove, homo sapiens sapiens screws the Theory of Evolution. Supposedly, they have reason to overcome their actions and the results. Some of us do.

      • Good Ol Boy

        Heh. Some of “us”?
        How, pray tell, do you, personally, “overcome your actions and the results” on the environment? Do you not consume sustenance of any sort? Do you forgo breathing?
        If you’re so worried about “biodiversity” and really care so much for the planet, then you should remove yourself from the problem. Perhaps with a belt, or a razor..

        • Martha

          Yup, some of us. So many don’t. Have you not noticed that?

          Sustenance and air (how do I point this out to someone who seems to know nothing about life) are *necessary* to existence. You may experiment and let me know if I am wrong.

          I am so worried about the planet that I must remain to crusade for its well being. Selfless, I know, but that’s me.

          • Good Ol Boy

            I notice that you didn’t give a single example of how you so piously “overcome your actions and the results” on the environment. LOL. I’m not the least bit surprised, because like sooo many other “enviromentalists” you don’t actually do anything but run your yap.

          • Martha

            Oh, I don’t want to brag. But I suppose I can confess I don’t own a car. And never have. Public transport, where is thy sting?

          • Good Ol Boy

            Now THATS funny! Oooh I’m an enviromental champion because I ride the diesel-spewing buss provided by the cess-pool of a city I live in. It would be more honest to say that you can’t afford a car because you’re a leftist parasite.

          • Martha

            If ya can’t handle the answer to your own question . . . Awww – it must hurt to be you. Try to change your ways – Gaia will luv you.

          • Good Ol Boy

            *chuckle*

          • Proud Infidel

            So you take the bus from the welfare office to the public library on your way home to post your drivel, eh? In the working part of the US, rural and small town, we don’t have the buses, etc., We have to take ourselves to work, and that includes carpooling.

          • Proud Infidel

            Hey G.O.B., just look at any place after any lefty group has a “save the Earth” mass rant, and you’ll see trash cleanup crews working overtime to clean up afterward!! Look at the same place after a Tea Party rally, and it will probably be cleaner than before, now who’s the polluter?

      • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

        Exhibit A of how hilariously ignorant of science the left is while claiming everyone else is.

  • Martha

    Ok, my children, I must leave. Part of saving the planet is attending the rally in Washington DC on the morrow. I shall go tonight and prepare. Watch me on the TeeVee. I’ll be the one with the entourage.

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      I’m sure the airplane flight there and all the trash you lefties will leave behind will be a big help for the environment.

      • Anonymous

        Maybe since people are rejecting their narrative they have to work to create environmental problems to get people outraged.

        They have to trash the earth the save it.

    • Anonymous

      How exactly does getting stoned with your buddies outside on public property ‘save the planet’?

      PS: try not to trash the place again. I know how you liberals love to completely wreck every site you hold a rally at by covering it with garbage. But someone has to clean it up (it sure as heck won’t be yall, you consider ‘personal responsibility’ to be a curse word).

  • Proud Infidel

    Liberal crusaders, they never cease dumping BS by the trainload!

  • Proud Infidel

    Yeah, stuff like this is bawled and howled about by characters like Al Gore Jr.. Leeeonardo DiCaaaprio, John Travolta, and other celebs who will take a private or charter jet somewhere and hop into a limo, stay in a hotel suite bigger than a lot of our homes and then appear at a rally and tell us peasants to eat tofu and ride the bus. If Al Gore Jr. was serious about species diversity and extinction, then why did he have Chilean Sea Bass (listed as threatened) served at his daughter’s wedding reception?
    I still clearly recollect being told that the Earth would definitely be uninhabitable in 10 years. Ozone depletion, acid rain, etc., and that was in 1988.

  • Anonymous

    As usual, liberals take a perfectly good idea and run it off the road into the ditch.

    Genetic monoculture has been a concern for scientists for quite a while. It’s why they put together that seed preservation project, just in case; monocultures are vulnerable to epidemics and blights. Food crops in particular may be susceptible to this, so it never hurts to have a backup plan.

    But this isn’t really about minimizing the risks of monoculture, now, is it?

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info