For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Global Warming News From The Brits
Written By : Dennis Avery

CHURCHVILLE, VA—My colleague Bennie Peiser, of Britain’s Global Warming Policy Foundation, offers some of his latest man-made global warming news:

The Sunday Times noted on May 22 that the UK government has agreed to cut its greenhouse emissions 50 percent by 2027. As a result, “Tata Steel last week announced it was cutting 1,500 jobs at its Scunthorpe and Teeside plants. The company, which employs 21,000 in Britain, has held high-level talks with government in recent weeks over its energy plans. . . . Ineos founder Jim Ratcliffe warned that he could be forced to shut the firm’s Runcorn chlorine plant, a big energy user . . . and employer of more than 1,000 people. According to Civitas [the think tank] . . . total energy bills . . . could rise by 141 percent by 2020.”

The Henley Standard said May 23 that houses and business premises as of 2016 must qualify for at least an “E” energy rating. At least 682,000 properties will need to be improved—and “this will radically increase rental costs as landlords withdraw their properties from the rental sector.”

Homeowners will also have to retrofit their houses with required energy-saving features such as double-glazed windows and more insulation, said The Guardian May 19. “The householder pays nothing up front, but the equipment and installation costs will be added in installments to the household’s energy bills for years.” At the moment, says the Guardian, householders will be charged market interest rates, which could mean 8 percent annually. Germany has attracted homeowner cooperation with subsidized loans as low as 2.65 percent—but the British government probably can’t afford to offer that.

The Sunday Telegraph of May 22 says the Welsh Assembly faces “the biggest consumer demonstration so far in Britain” if it goes forward with a plan for 800 giant new wind turbines on mid-Wales hills. In the Welsh Parliament, Glyn Davies said “the two-megawatt turbines would cost at least [$2.7 billion, plus another $500 million] for the infrastructure.” In contrast, a far bigger gas-fired power plant near Plymouth will produce power without subsidy at one fifteenth the cost—and without disfiguring the Welsh hills. “How many of those assembly members,” he asked, “will manage to step outside the bubble of illusion surrounding wind power?”
David Rose in The Mail on Sunday, May 22, reported a remarkable meeting of climate skeptics and “warmists.” He asked John Mitchell of the British Meteorological Office how long the planet’s non-warming would have to continue before [Mitchell] would start to question the computerized climate models. Mitchell replied, “People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful.” In other words, don’t doubt the coming disaster of man-made global warming just because the planet has stopped warming.

Henrik Svensmark of the Danish Space Institute told the meeting, “a key determinant of climate is the level of cosmic rays from outer space that hit the earth: these high-energy particles ‘seed’ the clouds. . . . More rays mean more clouds, and in turn a cooler climate.” Svensmark has demonstrated that “quite small variations in the amount of cloud cover have a big effect on temperature, leaving only a “small ‘residual’ role for man-made CO2.”

Finally, Briton Matt Ridley in the May 21 Wall Street Journal reported, “Haiti meets about 60 percent of its energy needs with charcoal produced from forests. Even bakeries, laundries, sugar refineries and rum distilleries run on the stuff. Full marks to renewable Haiti, the harbinger of a sustainable future! Or maybe not: Haiti has felled 98 percent of its tree cover and counting. . . . Haitians are now burning tree roots to make charcoal.”

DENNIS T. AVERY, a senior fellow for the Hudson Institute in Washington, DC, is an environmental economist. He was formerly a senior analyst for the Department of State. He is co-author, with S. Fred Singer, of Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 Hundred Years, Readers may write him at PO Box 202, Churchville, VA 2442, email to cgfi@hughes.net or visit our website at www.cgfi.org

0
  • Anonymous

    Is Britain trying to commit economic suicide?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lochemya-David/100002249359450 Lochemya David

      Yes.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lochemya-David/100002249359450 Lochemya David

      Yes.

    • Anonymous

      Seems like it.  And for reasons that are not entirely apparent.  I mean, I get why the top folks like it: control, obviously.  But why are the bottom folks so eager to put themselves back in to serfdom? 

  • Anonymous

    Is Britain trying to commit economic suicide?

  • Anonymous

    Is Britain trying to commit economic suicide?

  • Anonymous

    “People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful.”

    Just what are his models based on, if not on observations? Is he just making the data up?

    • http://www.angry.net/blog2 Angry Webmaster

      “Just what are his models based on, if not on observations? Is he just making the data up?”

      In answer to your question, yes. They are just making it up.

  • Anonymous

    Record Carbon Emissions in 2010
    In the wake of the devastating tornadoes in the central U.S., the International Energy Agency has reported that, despite the recession, greenhouse-gas emissions increased by a record amount last year to the highest carbon output in history. A record 30.6 gigatons of carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere last year, mainly from the burning of fossil fuels—up 1.6Gt from 2009. The shocking numbers mean that the goal of preventing a temperature rise of more than 2 degrees Celsius—which scientists claim is the threshold for potentially “dangerous climate change”—is “a nice Utopia,” according to the IEA. “Such warming would disrupt the lives and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people across the planet, leading to widespread mass migration and conflict,” Professor Lord Stern of the London School of Economics told The Guardian. “That is a risk any sane person would seek to drastically reduce.”

    • HammerNH

      Joe Not-so-bright to the rescue with irrelevant statements from a group that accepts the Gore-Bull Warming Hoax as fact.
      Really Joe, you should look at the complete picture of greenhouse gases, not minor elements like CO2.
      The real culprit in the greenhouse arsenal is the presence of DiHydrogen Monoxide (DHMO).
      This chemical is responsible for thousands of deaths worldwide each year.
      It is present everywhere on earth.
      You should abandon your silly pursuit of ‘carbon’ and investigate how to rid the world of DHMO.
      Learn more here:
      http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

    • HammerNH

      Joe Not-so-bright to the rescue with irrelevant statements from a group that accepts the Gore-Bull Warming Hoax as fact.
      Really Joe, you should look at the complete picture of greenhouse gases, not minor elements like CO2.
      The real culprit in the greenhouse arsenal is the presence of DiHydrogen Monoxide (DHMO).
      This chemical is responsible for thousands of deaths worldwide each year.
      It is present everywhere on earth.
      You should abandon your silly pursuit of ‘carbon’ and investigate how to rid the world of DHMO.
      Learn more here:
      http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

      • Anonymous

        We all declined right wing interpretations when Reagan came out with the relevation that it was the trees that emitted CO2 and caused pollution. You see, it was a natural phenomenon going on for millenium.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lochemya-David/100002249359450 Lochemya David

          Um…

          http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/5.full

          Wanna try again, there, skipper?

        • HammerNH

          “right wing interpretations”?
          ROFLMAO!
          There is no ‘interpreting the presence or effect of DHMO in greenhouse gases.
          You will see that when you figure out what it is…

        • HammerNH

          “right wing interpretations”?
          ROFLMAO!
          There is no ‘interpreting the presence or effect of DHMO in greenhouse gases.
          You will see that when you figure out what it is…

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lochemya-David/100002249359450 Lochemya David

      Considering that warmer climates produce less tornadoes, why did you even mention them?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lochemya-David/100002249359450 Lochemya David

      Considering that warmer climates produce less tornadoes, why did you even mention them?

    • Toastrider

      Do you know what causes tornadoes, you moron?

      No, of course not. Please continue parroting your pseudoscience.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RDUM7PJBQIFRKVT7C3BBNMP2NQ LeoS

      Then be an example and give up any and all items that contribute to carbon emissions. And no fire! Get back to the neanderthal way of life. 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RDUM7PJBQIFRKVT7C3BBNMP2NQ LeoS

      Then be an example and give up any and all items that contribute to carbon emissions. And no fire! Get back to the neanderthal way of life. 

  • Anonymous

    The alarmist- “Record carbon emissions in 2010″ So is that why hurricanes, which were supposed to increase in severity do to “global warming”, have actually decreased in severity? Anybody remember a hurricane since Katrina?  “In the wake of devastating tornadoes…..greenhouse gas emissions increased…..”  Meaning, what, professor? Cause and effect? Please show proof.  ”Devestating tornadoes” couldn’t be because there’s more and more people in the way of them now, could it? Nah. Or that there’s thousands more people trained to spot them than in years before? No, says the alarmists…..oh, never mind.   

  • Anonymous

    The alarmist- “Record carbon emissions in 2010″ So is that why hurricanes, which were supposed to increase in severity do to “global warming”, have actually decreased in severity? Anybody remember a hurricane since Katrina?  “In the wake of devastating tornadoes…..greenhouse gas emissions increased…..”  Meaning, what, professor? Cause and effect? Please show proof.  ”Devestating tornadoes” couldn’t be because there’s more and more people in the way of them now, could it? Nah. Or that there’s thousands more people trained to spot them than in years before? No, says the alarmists…..oh, never mind.   

  • Anonymous

    The alarmist- “Record carbon emissions in 2010″ So is that why hurricanes, which were supposed to increase in severity do to “global warming”, have actually decreased in severity? Anybody remember a hurricane since Katrina?  “In the wake of devastating tornadoes…..greenhouse gas emissions increased…..”  Meaning, what, professor? Cause and effect? Please show proof.  ”Devestating tornadoes” couldn’t be because there’s more and more people in the way of them now, could it? Nah. Or that there’s thousands more people trained to spot them than in years before? No, says the alarmists…..oh, never mind.   

  • Pingback: Global Warming

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P5ZBHJHBW7M7J22I3K4Y3OYHUI ron

    Merkel announced yesterday that Germany will close down all nuclear plants. Ah, the English are going to follow their friends the Germans. Maybe the Germans really did win WWII.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_P5ZBHJHBW7M7J22I3K4Y3OYHUI ron

    Merkel announced yesterday that Germany will close down all nuclear plants. Ah, the English are going to follow their friends the Germans. Maybe the Germans really did win WWII.

  • http://www.24-seven.org/index.php/member/9947 guide golfs

    God gave us the present of life; it really is up to us to present ourselves the present of living well.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info