NASA: No Increase In CO2, Global Warming A Sham

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

NASA: No Increase In CO2, Global Warming A Sham

Written By : Melissa Clouthier

AJ Strata has made an amazing find and I want to share it with you:

The email is from Reto Ruedy at GISS, one of Hansen’s top analysts. It is a headline worthy admission. There is no evidence of CO2 driven global warming in any of the US temp data – even though we are accused of being the CO2 generating capitol of the world. What’s more, they do not expect to see any evidence of AGW in the US for 2-4 more decades! I think we could afford to wait a little longer to see if this theory holds up.

And yet, without ANY evidence of AGW active in the US, Americans are supposed to cripple our economy and shell out billions in tax dollars? How could AGW be evident everywhere else but not here in the great CO2 producing center of all human kind? These “NASA” scientists are admitting they have never yet measured any global warming in the US outside natural causes.

Go read the whole thing. Global Warming is utter b.s. The evidence keeps piling up and yet we hear nothing in the press.

Jack Schite

The US economy can easily support doing the right thing and rid ourselves of the dependence on foreign oil.
StanInTexas

The US economy can easily support doing the right thing and rid ourselves of the dependence on foreign oil.
Posted by Jack Schite 2010-01-22 14:15:23

WOW, a Liberal that is in favor of drilling here.

You never cease to amaze me, Jack.
Smithwick

The US can lessen it’s dependence on foreign oil (a legitimate security concern that has nothing to do with AGW) simply by increasing drilling here, adding incentives for using domestic energy sources such as coal and natural gas that we have in large supply and making money/permits available for nuclear power plants (also opening Yucca mountain finally).
http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

Close, but no cigar, Jacqui. In the psychiatric business, your comment would be termed as “tangential” – kinda, sorta, maybe connected to the actual content of the OP, but not really. Care to debate the actual science behind the man-caused climate change hypothesis, or are you going to continue to deflect the conversation to something else?

What’s ironically funny about your comment is that you’ll find that a majority of people who read/post here already support, most strongly, moving away from imported oil and moving towards using our own petroleum resources.

Maybe if you’d stop screeching at us between your little lecturettes, you’d have picked that nugget of wisdom up by now, mate.

But, in the spirit of full disclosure, most of us aren’t terribly afraid of being held hostage by our largest petroleum supplier, because it’s Canada, and we’re only slightly concerned about our second largest supplier, because that’s Mexico.

Anyway, Teach, that is a nice catch there. Those scientists pants have been hitting the ground hot and heavy now for a while.
http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

My apologies, Melissa, I mistakenly referred to you as Teach and, well, obviously that’s not you and you’re not him. Mea culpa.
http://www.drakz.com/online/environment/?p=3297 NASA: No Increase In CO2, Global Warming A Sham | Right Wing News | Drakz Free Online Service

[...] posted here: NASA: No Increase In CO2, Global Warming A Sham | Right Wing News Share and [...]