Why Poland and the Czech Republic Were Fed to the Bear

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Why Poland and the Czech Republic Were Fed to the Bear

Written By : Dave Blount

In case you were wondering why Chairman Zero threw our Polish and Czech allies to the Russian bear by yanking away their missile defense — on the 70th anniversary of Poland’s invasion by Russia, no less — foreign policy wiz Joe Biden explains:

“I think we are fully capable and secure dealing with any present or future potential Iranian threat,” he told CNN’s Chris Lawrence in Baghdad, where he is on a brief trip.

“The whole purpose of this exercise we are undertaking is to diminish the prospect of the Iranians destabilizing that region in the world. I am less concerned — much less concerned — about the Iranian potential.”

Who cares about Russia? The problem is Iran, and Iran’s not a problem. Also breaking yesterday:

Experts at the world’s top atomic watchdog are in agreement that Tehran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is on the way to developing a missile system able to carry an atomic warhead, according to a secret report seen by The Associated Press.

The document drafted by senior officials at the International Atomic Energy Agency is the clearest indication yet that the agency’s leaders share Washington’s views on Iran’s weapon-making capabilities.

It appears to be the so-called “secret annex” on Iran’s nuclear program that Washington says is being withheld by the IAEA’s chief.

Iran is on the verge of producing nuclear missiles that could reach our friends in Eastern Europe, and our government knows it — but apparently Plugs didn’t know that we know that he knows. Or he actually has no clue what’s going on, because the mistake of bringing this idiot into the White House to lend gravitas to Comrade Obama’s foreign policy is so glaringly obvious that they don’t bother to brief him anymore.

What’s really behind the sacrifice of our loyal Iraq allies Poland and the Czech Republic to their more immediate threat, Russia? Reaganite Republican offers a clue:

Once the White House announced they were axing the shield, Russia’s government said PM Vladimir Putin would meet several U.S. executives today from firms including General Electric, Morgan Stanley, and TPG- one of the world’s largest private equity firms.

General Electric may be the company with the closest ties to the Obama administration (if not Goldman Sachs), and here we see the company benefiting from a sudden foreign policy change implemented by Barack Obama.

GE CEO Jeff Immelt sits on Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, and GE owns MSNBC- you figure it out.

Even the three stooges — Brian Williams, Charles Gibson, Katie Cupcake — have the smarts to connect a few of these dots had they any interest. Scratch Williams — he’s on GE’s payroll.

Freedom’s defense against a reawakening Evil Empire.

On tips from I’m A Lasagna Hog, Refuter of Liberal Vermin, Gretchen, and Byron. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

D-Vega

Yeah, Obama is paying off GE.

Just like Bush did with Haliburton, I would assume.

When is VH going to show some level of integrity?

We didn't yank Poland's missle defense. They more defended now than ever before since we will have a European defense shield. From Russia, and Iran. Plus, Russia won't be as concerned with their security, thus making Poland more safe.

Considering the amount of "friends" the Bush family has/had, right up to the Saudi Royal family, you don't have a leg to stand on.

Have you no decency, sir?
D-Vega

Something that "Herr VH", and all the other right-wing reactionary hacks, fail to mention is that both Poland & the Czech Republic are members of NATO.

You know what NATO is, right VH?

Stick to World-Weekly-News-type stories from your native UK.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Just like Bush did with Haliburton, I would assume.

That has got to be the most blatantly partisan crap-filled post of the week. You're not only a total suck-up to His Obamaness, you're an incompetent one at that. Pull your head out of the royal ass, D-Vega. You used to be worth conversing with, but now you're just an object of pity and ridicule.
D-Vega

I was simply illustrating the parallel, Cav. No need to blow a gasket.

I don't think Haliburton was in "cohoots" with Bush over Iraq.

However, if you think that idea is ridiculous, then you would have to say the same about Obama & GE, which is WHAT THIS POST IS ABOUT.

It's amazing you would call what I said "the most blatantly partisan crap-filled post of the week" and yet you don't find VH's assertion that Poland & the CR were "fed to the bear" because GE benefits partisan at all? Not crap-filled?
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

I was simply illustrating the parallel, Cav

There is no parallel.

It's amazing you would call what I said "the most blatantly partisan crap-filled post of the week" and yet you don't find VH's assertion that Poland & the CR were "fed to the bear" because GE benefits partisan at all? Not crap-filled?

If I had to characterise it, I'd say "chillingly accurate." I've been wondering exactly what kind of deal Obama made to sell Poland out like that.
D-Vega

There is no parallel.

Of course there is. A multi-national corporation with ties to the admin benefiting from a change in foreign policy. Haliburton actually had stronger ties to the Bush admin than GE does to Obama's.

Coincidence? Probably. Both corps are huge.

If I had to characterise it, I'd say "chillingly accurate." I've been wondering exactly what kind of deal Obama made to sell Poland out like that.

Of course. Because its partisan hackery.

If the Obama/GE connection is "chillingly accurate", than the Bush/Haliburton one is the same.

Don't preach to me about partisan crap and then defend something blatantly hackish.
http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

I don't think Haliburton was in "cohoots" with Bush over Iraq.

So let me see if I understand this "logic".

President Bush did not have a corrupt relationship with Halliburton, therefore a completely different President cannot possibly have a corrupt relationship with a completely different company?

Really D-Vega?
http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

Shut up, hoggo. Nobody cares what you think.
whats_up

Posted by mightysamurai

2009-09-18 15:45:59

Yes really Sam, unless of course you have some proof that this is going on, oh thats right you cant back up your assinine statements, thanks for playing though.
http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

Yes really Sam

Well in that case, let's run with this logic.

OJ Simpson is a black man and a murderer. Therefore, all black men are murderers.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Obama did not sell out Poland.

You may be right — he's so clueless he probably gave it away.
http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

You know what NATO is, right VH?

Stick to World-Weekly-News-type stories from your native UK.

Posted by D-Vega

2009-09-18 15:27:21

I'm sure he does Vega, it's a MUTUAL DEFENSE TREATY. So what part of supplying our allys with the best defense equipment and technology did the missle sheild violate again?
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

It is interesting that health care in the Czech Republic is funded by public sources (taxes) at a greater percentage than the highest percentage in any country in Western Europe. Norway has the highest percentage of public funding of health care for a Western European nation (86%) while the Czech Republic's percentage is at 91%.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread.

Actually, hoggo's right. The reason these countries can successfully implement socialized medicine is because unicorns and fairies are forced into hard labor in sweatshops. The government keeps the money to implement these programs.

The government used to be able to fund these programs with gold but Rumpelstiltskin recently retired so the governments now have to turn to alternate means.

There, hoggo, I can write fairy tales as well.

(/sarc, do I really need to include this?)
http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

Posted by slobrainish

2009-09-18 15:16:08

2009-09-18 15:45:57

2009-09-18 16:02:26

As I count it, that's three of your patented attempts to rile people up:

I post on RWN because its easy and fun to fluster political ideologues who are more obsessed with attacking the opposition than they are in boosting their own positive aspects.

It looks like all you got was mightysamurai's canned responce, and that's about it. It looks like it's a matter that nobody does care about your ideas hoggo. You're even a failure at your own stated mission now.

ROFLMAO X 100.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Obama did not sell out Poland.

Of course not. The federal government took over Poland and it is now being run by union thugs. (/sarc)
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Both you and martinhale are mistaken about my motive for posting on RWN. I don't do it to change minds. Highly partisan political bloggers are not composed of people who are open to rational debate or having their minds changed. I don't do it to keep score. There is no designated unbiased RWN scorekeeper to perform that function.

I post on RWN because its easy and fun to fluster political ideologues who are more obsessed with attacking the opposition than they are in boosting their own positive aspects. The vast majority of RWN OP's and its responders focus their ideological energy on the negative by attacking the opposition. Fortunately for me, there almost always exists in the real world examples of both sides committing the same types of infractions for which negative focused political bloggers attack the opposition. That is what makes many RWN OP's and their supporters such easy marks to fluster. I can almost almost always find a real world example of when the other dog got kicked. The leftist blogs are just as vulnerable in that regard. I've actually tried it. Its not near as much fun. The liberal bloggers don't get their panties in as much of a knot as do conservative bloggers when I infuse the "whoose dog got kicked" game into their partisan negative attacks.

Posted by snohomish
http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 16:40:27

Uh So their troops aren't in Iraq and or Afgahnistan?? So what part of the treaty would you have the US fulfill since we're you several THOUSAND MILES away?? And please point out for dipshit, where Poland or the Chechs ASKED for the sheild, as I recall the idea was proposed by US. But please don't let your idiocy fail to keep from your fairy tales.

You are officially and copleted relagated to the stupidest troll currently on RWN!!!
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

If Obamateur was concerned about the US taxpayer, he would do something about that whole tripling of the deficit trick he just did in 8 months.

Face it, his biggest mouthpieces at GE owned networks just got a face to face meeting with Vlad Putin for Boama throwing our allies out the window. In other words, Obama bought his supporters making money off of Russia by selling out our allies, and no one on the left cares. The only person defending this is a sockpuppet for a banned poster who has used 8 differing user names.

In short, Obama's friends stand to make millions off of this move for the wallets. An Inconvenient Truth.
D-Vega

I'm sure he does Vega, it's a MUTUAL DEFENSE TREATY. So what part of supplying our allys with the best defense equipment and technology did the missle sheild violate again?

None, but not installing them and moving the defense effort to something more mobile, that does not directly provoke Russia, not only is the right thing to do, but also still protects Poland. And if Russia were to attack Poland, NATO would have to respond.

So Poland & the CR were not "fed to the bear". VH is wrong, or lying.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

I wonder if this will include an apology by Obama to Poland and the Czech Republic for this stunt?

Nah, I'm sure Obama will apologize to Russia instead.
rmiller

/sarc, do I really need to include this?)

Posted by Kingfisher

2009-09-18 16:33:22

All do respect…you did obfuscate what your point might have been. I did look forward to a straight forward analysis…that didn't happen.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

And if Russia were to attack Poland, NATO would have to respond.

So NATO would have to respond AFTER Poland was invaded.

Um, Vega, the purpose of DEFENSE is to DEFEND a county FROM being invaded.
http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

None, but not installing them and moving the defense effort to something more mobile, that does not directly provoke Russia, not only is the right thing to do, but also still protects Poland.

You assume he means to keep his word!!! And i'm sorry but the if the Russians don't pose a threat to Eastern Europe, then why do we care if Russia feels provoked??

And if Russia were to attack Poland, NATO would have to respond.

Yup without adequate missle defense!!!

So Poland & the CR were not "fed to the bear". VH is wrong, or lying.

Posted by D-Vega

2009-09-18 16:49:10

That's your OPINION, and not supported any facts, VH has history to support numerous acts of agression by Russia against Eastern Europe.
http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

oops damn tags
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

None, but not installing them and moving the defense effort to something more mobile,

Smart move. That way, Obama can order them to turn tail and run when the going gets tough. After all, Obama's image is the most important! (/more sarc)
rmiller

In case you were wondering why Chairman Zero threw our Polish and Czech allies to the Russian bear by yanking away their missile defense — on the 70th anniversary of Poland’s invasion by Russia, no less — foreign policy wiz Joe Biden explains:

“I think we are fully capable and secure dealing with any present or future potential Iranian threat,” he told CNN’s Chris Lawrence in Baghdad, where he is on a brief trip.

Return to Top Van Helsing | 2:41 pm

Yes…because we are fully capable and secure dealing with any present or future potential Iranian threat.

That is why we might be trying alternatives. Biden is such an idiot.
D-Vega

You assume he means to keep his word!!! And i'm sorry but the if the Russians don't pose a threat to Eastern Europe, then why do we care if Russia feels provoked??

Having missle shields peering into Russia is definitely provocation. This way, a general security apparatus in put into place, rather than something specifically focused on Russia.

Yup without adequate missle defense!!!

No, there will still be a missle defense. Just not a land-based missle defense.

That's your OPINION, and not supported any facts, VH has history to support numerous acts of agression by Russia against Eastern Europe.

He is not just asserting that Russia is aggressive. That is a fact.

What he is asserting is that the U.S. pulled land-based missle defenses from Poland & the CR in order to satisfy GE.

That is something that HE has no proof of. Only because some GE people are in the Obama admin?

Well, some people from Haliburton were in the Bush admin. So I guess the theory about Haliburton in Iraq was correct.

He is either misguided or just lying. Considering his history, he is most likely lying.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Having missle shields peering into Russia is definitely provocation.

So what's Obama's response to Iran considering that Iran is intentionally provoking Israel by claiming that Israel will be 'wiped off the map?'
rmiller

Posted by Kingfisher

2009-09-18 17:12:18

That's a legitimate question. What does that have to do with

topic of the thread?
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Yes…because we are fully capable and secure dealing with any present or future potential Iranian threat.

rmiller

Really? How will we deal with a Iranian statement they are closing the Straits of Hormuz and will nuke anything that goes thru it, if they did that once they have working nukes?

You will have $150 a barrel oil and our economy will nose dive in about two days.

What will Obama due, other than blame Bush and call the Iranians racists?
D-Vega

So what's Obama's response to Iran considering that Iran is intentionally provoking Israel by claiming that Israel will be 'wiped off the map?'

Building an effective missle shield around Europe to protect our allies.

And don't forget Israel still gets billions in US military aid. Israel also has nukes of its own.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 17:21:26

You ready to fess up to having 8 previous user names?

Nixon has asked you repeatedly to yes or no that question. If you are afraid to answer, at least be a man and admit to you fear.
rmiller

Really? How will we deal with a Iranian statement they are closing the Straits of Hormuz and will nuke anything that goes thru it, if they did that once they have working nukes?

You will have $150 a barrel oil and our economy will nose dive in about two days.

What will Obama due, other than blame Bush and call the Iranians racists?

Posted by Dick_Nixon

2009-09-18 17:23:34

You have not been paying attention, have you?

We will use our military to keep the straits open because that is what is necessary.

And we will continue encourage conservation.

I don't understand why you think any other course is available.

Any liberal or conservative administration will be forced to keep the straits of Hormuz open, and the oil flowing. That is the nature of our addiction.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

None of this discussion has anything to do with GE executives getting private audiences with Putin due to Obama throwing our allies under the bus. Said executives control the three blatantly pro Obama networks, NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC. A quid pro quo.
http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

Having missle shields peering into Russia is definitely provocation. This way, a general security apparatus in put into place, rather than something specifically focused on Russia.

So where else from Poland would you be able to detect and Iranina missle? Draw the line IT HAS TO PEER INTO RUSSIA, other it's a sophisticated peice of junk. And if the Russians have anything to hide it would be a huge surprise to the Russians. Since they know we can and do track their every move daily. We've been doing it for almost 40 years. So the objection to this is lame and nothing but showmanship by Russia.

What he is asserting is that the U.S. pulled land-based missle defenses from Poland & the CR in order to satisfy GE.

No he implied that Obambi helped get Putin an audience with GE, which is beneficial to everyone accept Poland and the Chechs.

That is something that HE has no proof of. Only because some GE people are in the Obama admin?

Connecting dots is now wrong? Proposing possible reasons why you undercut allies who have been promised you support? Sorry it may not be fact, but it's not all that unique, and more than a little plausible.

Well, some people from Haliburton were in the Bush admin. So I guess the theory about Haliburton in Iraq was correct.

I know of only, and he no longer worked them, and their contract with the US was in place before Bush took office. So connected those dots a little harder to believe.

He is either misguided or just lying. Considering his history, he is most likely lying.

Posted by D-Vega

2009-09-18 17:08:28

Maybe, or maybe he's just not willing to trust the penultimate 'Chicago Machine' Pol, and wants details about WHY we are changing the plan.
rmiller

one of this discussion has anything to do with GE executives getting private audiences with Putin due to Obama throwing our allies under the bus. Said executives control the three blatantly pro Obama networks, NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC. A quid pro quo.

Posted by Dick_Nixon

2009-09-18 17:31:40

Nor the thread:Why Poland and the Czech Republic Were Fed to the Bear

Nixon….you are as lost as any of us.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Any liberal or conservative administration will be forced to keep the straits of Hormuz open, and the oil flowing. That is the nature of our addiction.

Posted by rmiller

2009-09-18 17:30:20

You really think that Barak Obama would commit US military forces against a threat before they nuked a ship?

You are living in fantasy world my young padawan.

Maybe, we could develop our domestic oil supplies to reduce our foreign oil dependence. Nixon knows you liberal oppose that idea, so he won't hold his breath.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

That is correct. Also correct is that 71% of Israel's health care costs are public funded (taxes). Perhaps Isreal had to pony the extra taxes to pay its entire defense program, then they would be hard pressed to come up with the taxes to fund their socialized government run health care insurance system.

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 17:38:29

Nixon noticed your reluctance to answer my question on why you are on your 8th user name.

Thanks for playing.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Nixon….you are as lost as any of us.

Posted by rmiller

2009-09-18 17:35:05

The article neglected the quid pro quo of Obama supporters profitting for the One throwing our allies under the bus. And, since those networks are the main party liners for Obama, how he is personally benefitting from said course of action.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

No, there will still be a missle defense. Just not a land-based missle defense.

Magical missiles powered by pixie dust won't do a damn thing to stop a missile.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

So what's Obama's response to Iran considering that Iran is intentionally provoking Israel by claiming that Israel will be 'wiped off the map?'

Hey, keep up with the times. As of today, Ahmadinejad is saying "Confronting the Zionist regime is a national and religious duty," and that Israel "will not last long. Do not tie your fate to it … This regime has no future. Its life has come to an end." See? All warm and fuzzy, no threat there.
http://tinyurl.com/lbxk6l
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Any liberal or conservative administration will be forced to keep the straits of Hormuz open, and the oil flowing.

I think that's called the "Pretty Please Gambit."
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

What Nixon has learned in the last few days:

1. Snohomish is on his eighth user name.

2. Snohomish hates Jews, Czechs, and Poles.

3. Snohomish admires Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban.

3.A. Snohomish despises the legally lawfully elected government of Afghanistan, and is apparently ok if said government falls.

4. Snohomish voted for Obama, after endorsing McCain. Of course, he also said McCain was unfit to be POTUS 96 hours after endorsing him. He then told us three days later McCain was the only man of principle running for President. Then he voted for Obama.

5. Snohomish admires Vlad Putin, and supported the illegal invasion of Georgia by Russia. He is also ok with Iran having nukes to use on our allies.

All this week. It's gold, Jerry. All gold.
rmiller

You really think that Barak Obama would commit US military forces against a threat before they nuked a ship?

You are living in fantasy world my young padawan.

Maybe, we could develop our domestic oil supplies to reduce our foreign oil dependence. Nixon knows you liberal oppose that idea, so he won't hold his breath.

Posted by Dick_Nixon

2009-09-18 17:41:36

You sound conflicted.

What we can agree upon is that no administration has a choice other than to defend our pipelines….until alternatives exist.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

You sound conflicted.

you sound naive.
rmiller

I think that's called the "Pretty Please Gambit."

Posted by CavalierX

2009-09-18 17:52:51

Agreed…and we are subject to it.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 18:06:17

Nixon learned that you don't have the balls to answer his question about. Also, based on your lack of condemnation of the wasteful spending of Barak Hussein Obama, you are a hypocrite.

DO you realize Hogg, that you have never won any argument where you engaged Nixon? Zero for however many it is.

.000

Thanks for playing, Nixon occassionally needs to scrimmage the inferior to stay on form.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

oops, typo by Nixon.You don't have the balls to answer Nixon's question about your eight user names.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 18:06:17

Yet you have posted nothing about this until Obama threw our allies under the bus.

Hypocrite.
rmiller

Nixon or Cav…

YOu cant' serviously believe that either of you have offered any alternative to VH claim that Poland or the Czech republic were offered to Russia?
D-Vega

Magical missiles powered by pixie dust won't do a damn thing to stop a missile.

Are you saying our Joint Chiefs of Staff & SecDef are supporting a plan comprised of magical missles powered by pixie dust?

Or does that FACT (seas-based missle defense) negate the right-wing hyper-ventilating over this issue, and that's why you are ridiculing it?
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

YOu cant' serviously believe that either of you have offered any alternative to VH claim that Poland or the Czech republic were offered to Russia?

Posted by rmiller

2009-09-18 18:13:46

Obama threw both countries under the bus in order to get his media partners face time with Putin, to help pay for the free advertising his Administration gets nightly on NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Considering that Obama has a 0.000% success rate since his inauguration I wouldn't recommend that any liberals put blind faith into this move.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-18 18:14:26

post one argument you have won against Nixon. Nixon won't hold his breath.

Why are you on your 8th user name btw? Nixon notices that you are reluctant to go on the record one way or the other on this subject. No guts, Hogground?
D-Vega

Obama threw both countries under the bus in order to get his media partners face time with Putin,

That is a lie, Nixon.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

That is a lie, Nixon.

Posted by D-Vega

2009-09-18 18:19:33

Proof would be nice.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Reuters reports an interesting nugget in the wake of President Barack Obama’s decision to grant Vladimir Putin his wish and kill the Eastern European missile shield:

Shortly after the pullback on the shield programme was announced, Russia’s government said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin would meet several U.S. executives on Friday from firms including General Electric, Morgan Stanley as well as TPG, one of the world’s largest private equity firms

General Electric may be the company with the closest ties to the Obama administration (if not, GE is second only to Goldman Sachs), and here we see the company benefiting from an abrupt foreign policy change made by President Obama. But GE isn’t the only company benefiting. Reuters paints the broader picture…

An Inconvenient Truth.
http://www.rpgclassics.com/shrines/genesis/kingbounty/ murray_the_miser

Why are you on your 8th user name btw? Nixon notices that you are reluctant to go on the record one way or the other on this subject. No guts, Hogground?

Posted by Dick_Nixon

2009-09-18 18:19:10

Silence can be far more damning that actually answering in some cases. Hogg's refusal to answer is an implicit admission of guilt…as if we didn't all known anyway.

I'm amazed he's still here after his statement of a couple of days ago. On most forums that are competently run such an admission would be a one way ticket to the door. For example some years ago I was arguing with a leftist idiot on another forum and asked him how some outlandish statement furthered the discussion. He commented that he was "not here to debate" and that he "just liked to get under the skin of the wingnuts". I hit the "report" button on the guy's post and within two hours the guy was gone and his acount had a "banned" notice next to it.

Most normal sites have a similar policy toward disruptive users who make the amazingly brazen move of coming out and admitting they are trolls. Why is this place different? is RWN that desperate for readership that it has to turn a blind eye to such behavior?

Finally, I note tha two of our non-troll leftists are on this thread. Vega and rmiller, are you two willing to go on the record and condemn "snohomish" aka groundhog for being a troll given his open admission?
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Nixon I've never played to win against you. You are a negatively focused political ideologue. Absent an unbiased referee or scorekeeper, playing win/loose with negatively focused political ideologue is an excercise in futility.

Pussy

In other words, Nixon has destroyed you. Brutally. Every time.

Go fuck youself my liberal POS friend. Nutless wonder is what you are.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

God's blessing on America was not given for hoarding. It was given for sharing.

Yet you oppose our sharing of our military aid with our friends.

OOPS another destruction by Nixon.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

I actually believe that America is a gift from God

We have a separation of church and state in this country. Keep your theocracy to yourself.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

Regarding all of my above posts in this OP and likekind in other related OP's lately : It was fun. But those posts do not reflect my world view.

Look at this fucker admit he lied to agitate.

It's gold Jerry, gold I tell you.

Game. Set. Match. To. Nixon, again.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Nixon I've never played to win against you.

Because you know you're outmatched. At least you're smart in one department.

You are a negatively focused political ideologue.

Gee, you bitch and whine just like Obama.

Absent an unbiased referee or scorekeeper,

I'm the official scorekeeper of RWN and I would rule that Nixon kicked your ass big time.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Are you saying our Joint Chiefs of Staff & SecDef are supporting a plan comprised of magical missles powered by pixie dust?

I think Obama has already used up all of the pixie dust on the economy and health care.
http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

I'll pray for you my children.

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-19 02:06:50

Save it, theocrat.
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

I'll pray for you my children.

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-19 02:06:50

Sorry, I don't want satan's help.
http://www.rpgclassics.com/shrines/genesis/kingbounty/ murray_the_miser

Has anyone emailed William Teach about this guy yet? He said a few months ago to contact him if we were having troll troubles. We all know that John Hawkins will not lift a finger, but perhaps one of his staff will. Surely an open admission of trolling will make him consider acting.
jasamc

When you find that all else has failed to remove those demons which torment your souls, don't discount exorcism.

Posted by snohomish

2009-09-19 02:06:50

What torments my soul? Liberals.

So, by your statement, liberals are demons which can be eliminated by the church.

COOL!
Huron_Serenity

http://www.informationdissemination.net/2009/09/i…

It is being replaced by an effective system.

Eastern Europe is not being sacrificed. How could Poland and the Czech Republic be sacrificed anyways? They are part of NATO now.