Introducing Three-Way Lesbian Marriage
So long as they do not encounter sufficient resistance to stop them, progressives will always push the envelope further. Currently there is virtually no resistance, the Culture War having degenerated into a rout as conservatives shell-shocked by words like “intolerant” and “homophobe” drop their weapons and take to their heels. This means that the blitzkrieg campaign to normalize homosexuality is only the beginning. Among the new grotesqueries already appearing on the horizon — three-way lesbian marriage:
The world’s only ‘married’ lesbian threesome are expecting their first child.
Doll, Kitten and Brynn, from Massachusetts, were joined together in a marriage-style ceremony last August and are expecting a daughter in July.
Expecting a daughter? What about biological reality, which tends not to conform to the latest liberal social engineering fads? No problem; modern science allows an end run around it:
Kitten, 27, is pregnant after undergoing IVF treatment using an anonymous sperm donor, and the trio eventually plan to have three children – one for each of them. …
Brynn, 34, says: ‘The hope is to have three kids altogether. We always joke that the children should never outnumber the parents.’
Not to worry, Brynn. Given current trends, they won’t. The only thing that keeps the population from shrinking to levels that will cause Ponzi schemes like Social Security to collapse in the near future is a massive influx of the Third Worlders our government is importing to replace us.
Doll, Kitten and Brynn Young married in a ceremony in August 2013, when each of their fathers walked them down the aisle. All three women wore white wedding gowns and exchanged rings.
No word on whether the government forced Christians to take part in the blasphemous parody.
Three-way marriage isn’t technically legal yet, so a lawyer pasted everything together into a crude semblance of a marriage until the laws catch up, as they surely will.
The so-called ‘throuple’ worked with a specialist family lawyer who drew up the paperwork and drafted the ceremony so that all three of them were obligated and bound to each other.
The “family” lawyer should make another tidy profit when it comes time for the three-way divorce.
Senior Software Designer and Engineer, Brynn had been married twice before to women and both experiences had made her acknowledge that monogamous relationships weren’t for her.
When this new arrangement fails to fill the gnawing void where a normal life should be, maybe she will get married to an entire NOW chapter.
Doll doesn’t like to be tied down either:
‘I never thought that much about it and I had never really ‘come out’ as poly to my friends and family. To me, it was just how I was.’
Are you one of those old-fashioned types who think a marriage should be between two people? Get ready to be denounced as a polyphobe.
Massachusetts — the state that gave us Barney Frank and the pedophile Gerry Studds — led the way in homosexual marriage as the first state to inflict it with a judicial ruling in 2004. Residents must be very proud that their state continues to stand at the vanguard of our culture’s decline.
Doll, Kitten, and Brynn are just a freak show exhibit. The moonbats whose chests swell with sanctimonious self-satisfaction when they reflect on how “inclusive” they are for approving of the attack on the sanctity of marriage are just cattle. The drovers driving them along are the opinion-imposers on the courts and in the media. These cultural Marxists actually know what they are doing: methodically deconstructing our civilization in order to destroy it.
Once everything has been wiped away right down to the most basic foundations, a new society can be constructed on a coercive basis in accordance with leftist ideology. If you are lucky, you won’t live to see it.
On tips from Whotothewhat and Wiggins. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
by: Anna Maria Hoffman Recently, we received a question from Michael, one of our readers from the U.K. “What is the
MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Loses It on a Conservative Guest from the Heritage Foundation Over Controversial Indiana Law: ‘Cut His Mic Off!’ [Video]
Ed Schultz is such a raving, biased moonbat. There is no room for any opinion but his, even when he