For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
How’s Switching NASA’s Mission From Exploring Space To Muslim Outreach Going?
Written By : John Hawkins

When I became the NASA administrator — or before I became the NASA administrator — he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering. — NASA Administrator Charles Bolden

In 1969, the first American set foot on the moon. Today, more than 40 years later under Obama, not only have we not gone back to the moon, we don’t even have a space shuttle capable of getting to the International Space Station. How’s that working out for us?

WASHINGTON — The possible first-ever evacuation of the International Space Station, if a Russian spacecraft is not launched in November, would risk the loss of the orbiting lab, a NASA official has warned.

“There is a greater risk of losing the ISS when it’s unmanned than if it were manned,” Michael Suffredini, the ISS program manager for the US space agency, said on a conference call with reporters.

“The risk increase is not insignificant,” he added.

Russia on Monday delayed its next manned Soyuz spacecraft mission to the ISS by at least a month after an unmanned cargo vessel using a similar rocket crashed into Siberia instead of reaching orbit on August 24.

…Neither NASA nor the Russian space agency will allow the astronauts aboard the space station to remain beyond a mandated six-month limit because of the risk posed by exposure to radiation.

How dysfunctional has our government become under Obama? We’re going to spend 18 billion dollars on NASA in 2012, an agency dedicated to space exploration that no longer goes into space. Instead NASA is now mostly known for pumping out global warming propaganda and doing Muslim outreach.

Great job, Obama!

5
  • Anonymous

    Some current NASA missions:

    New Horizons (Pluto flyby)
    Dawn (Vesta and Ceres orbiter)
    Juno (Jupiter orbiter)
    Cassini (Saturn orbiter)
    Mars Odyssey (Mars orbiter)
    Messenger (Mercury orbiter)
    Opportunity (Mars Rover)
    Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Voyager 1
    Voyager 2
    WIND (Studying Solar Wind)
    Solar and Heliospheric Observatory
    Advanced Composition Explorer
    Wilkinson Microwave Probe
    STEREO (Solar Observatory)
    Spitzer Space Telescope
    THEMIS (Studying Earth’s magnetosphere)
    Hubble
    Solar Dynamics Observatory
    Galaxy Evolution Explorer
    Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission
    Kepler (Observatory looking for extrasolar planets)
    Chandra X-ray Observatory

    Soon to be launched:

    Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array
    Curiosity (Mars rover)
    GRAIL (Lunar orbiter)

    Mostly doing global warming “propaganda” and Muslim outreach, eh?

    • Anonymous

      Isn’t that just like a liberal, attempting to give credit where it isn’t due.  That’s a nice list of things NASA HAS done and/or started BEFORE Obama took over as president.  For example, the Voyager missions were launched in 1977. 

      As for the three you list as “soon to be launched”…
      All do have anticipated launch dates, but all are behind schedule.  At least one seems to be on hold, and ALL WERE STARTED BEFORE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE.

      For NASA the only thing Obama has done is postpone things.

      • Toastrider

        Hell, are we even receiving telemetry from Voyager any more?

        Fincher, you fuckin’ moron, go back to your corner.

        • Martin Hale

          We still receive telemetry from both Voyagers.  V1 is somewhere near the boundary between the Sun’s sphere of influence and true interstellar space.  It is the furthest any man-made object has traveled.   Nasa’s current budget includes funds to monitor and communicate with both Voyager craft.

        • Anonymous

          Because I posted a list of active NASA missions and soon to be launched missions?

  • Martin Hale

    I used to be a big fan of manned space flight.   I say “used to be” because in the past 10-15 years, I’ve come to the realisation that until we make some ‘quantum leap’ level advances in combating the harmful effects of weightlessness, in shielding astronauts against the variety of radiation risks they face and in finding a propulsion system which cuts travel time to real human scales, we’re not really going anywhere.

    While I’m confident that we can solve these problems, the cost of doing so is beyond our ability to finance those solutions.  Right now, it’s beyond the ability of all the nations on Earth combined to finance them.

    I have mixed feelings about the ISS being abandoned, even temporarily, but in the back of my mind, I think I’ve always understood that it would be abandoned at some point because of it’s impracticality.

    • Anonymous

      It’s not a matter of money, it’s a matter of will. This country spends $170 billion a year on debt interest, and more than the budget of the space program on farm subsidies. If this country valued science, we could have a thriving space program.

      Those very propulsion and power systems will lead us toward things like fuel cells and fusion power…clean and sustainable technologies that could vastly improve the global standard of living.

      We’ve essentially ceded hegemonic status by our failure to maintain the capability of manned space flight. We’ll realize that when China sweeps our satellites from the sky and replaces them with their own armed with nukes or kinetic bombardment warheads when the time comes for them to assert themselves.

      • Martin Hale

        Don’t misread me Baoxian – I’m still a huge fan of space exploration, I just don’t think we can afford to carry on with manned spaceflight. 

        I know we can solve the zero gravity problem, but at it’s simplest, that requires multiple craft tethered around a common centre of gravity and rotating.  More stuff to launch.  I know we can solve the shielding problem by surrounding a ship with a 30 ft thick shield of ice.  But water’s heavy and lifting the volumes of water needed into space is expensive.

        Let’s face it, manned exploration beyond having half-a-dozen people on an orbital platform is going to require a much cheaper lift technology.  Something like a space elevator is an attractive goal, but we’re decades away from wrestling down the considerable engineering issues of that.

        • Anonymous

          Getting payload into space won’t be the problem. It’s perfectly feasible to get cargo into orbit using railguns, and all the technology already exists. Fire some cargo shells into low orbit, have them picked up by a shuttle, and taken back to a space station at a LaGrange point…which is the logical jumping off point for a moon base or missions to Mars.  

          Counting build costs, a railgun system could get payload into orbit for around $500/kg. In comparison, the shuttle cost around $20,000/kg. That’s about $200 million to launch an equivalent mass of the ISS, which cost about $100 billion to build and orbit with rockets.

          Of course you still have to send the people up in rockets, but taken in 6-month shifts the cost is certainly not nation-state prohibitive.

  • JoeBrit

    “NASA is now mostly known for pumping out global warming propaganda and doing Muslim outreach.”

    Just not seeing the sources of this claim. Links please.

  • Pingback: More Bad News from NASA | The Western Experience

  • President Friedman

    Honestly, Bush probably has more share of the blame for our lack of a manned space program than Obama.  He scheduled the end of the Space Shuttle program without making any serious attempt to replace it.   Obama couldn’t expect NASA to design and build a brand new manned space vehichle in two years.   I suppose he could have rescinded Bush’s order and extended the lifespan of the Shuttle program, but even the folks at NASA weren’t fighting too hard for that, because the Shuttle has never lived up to expectations.  

    My biggest issue with Obama and NASA is that he just seems completely clueless on what to do with it.   As somebody else pointed out, NASA has a ton of ongoing and planned missions,  doing real science, important science.   We have learned more about space in the last decade than in the entire course of human and scientific history that proceeded it.   Even if we aren’t going to do manned spaceflight, NASA should be used for more important things than doing Muslim outreach programs and carrying water for the Department of Education.

    The problem with NASA’s manned spaceflight program very closely mirrors the problem with America… for decades it has suffered from a gross lack of vision and leadership, and we are finally seeing the results. 

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      President Bush pushed for space flight and set up the prize for manned space travel by the private sector so I’m less concerned with his actions than President Obama.

      • President Friedman

        Neither one is much to brag about, but I still when it comes to the lack of a modern NASA manned spaceflight program, Bush is the one who made that call. 

  • Pingback: The “demolition” expert. « The Radio Patriot

  • Anonymous

    You guys seriously removed a comment that simply listed active NASA missions and missions soon to be launched?

    Mr. Hawkins does not seem to like reality.

  • Anonymous

    You guys seriously removed a comment that simply listed active NASA missions and missions soon to be launched?

    Mr. Hawkins does not seem to like reality.

  • Pingback: textile market news

  • Pingback: garment business daily

  • Pingback: Rocky Pfander

  • Pingback: melrose barleygrass

  • Pingback: website registration uk

  • Pingback: SEO LOS ANGELES

  • Pingback: Los Angeles SEO

  • Pingback: roofing atlanta

  • Pingback: privacy window film

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info