Trading Right to Bear Arms for Right to Get High

How is this for a deal with the Devil? Illinois is willing to let you smoke “medical” marijuana — but only if you renounce your right to bear arms:

That means rather than hold substance abusers accountable for harming others while under the influence, sick and vulnerable people in physically weakened conditions will be unable to defend themselves at all times.

Technically, the same deal applies anywhere marijuana has been legalized.

“Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?” ATF’s Form 4473 Firearms Transaction Record asks, and if the answer is “Yes,” a sale may not proceed. Lying about that is a felony, and state laws notwithstanding, the federal government’s position is clear:

“[A]ny person who uses or is addicted to marijuana, regardless of whether his or her State has passed legislation authorizing marijuana use for medicinal purposes, is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance, and is prohibited by Federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition,” ATF Enforcement Programs and Services made clear in a 2011 open letter to Federal Firearms Licensees.

The federal government has no constitutional authority to regulate marijuana use. But then, it is explicitly forbidden by the Constitution from infringing on our right to bear arms. Constitutionality isn’t a fashionable concept in the Age of Hope & Change.

There is some good news. The Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that marijuana users cannot be denied concealed carry permits. However, they can still be forbidden from possessing guns.

Marijuana is well known to render those who indulge in it less intelligent and less industrious — but also less aggressive. Tying its use to gun ownership makes sense only from the point of view of a government trying to coax us into trading away our fundamental rights.

Nothing could more perfectly exemplify a short-sighted, lotus-eating liberal slave than a pot-head who surrenders his right to bear arms so that the government will let him get stoned in peace, as if that same government couldn’t come back for the marijuana and anything else it wants after it has the guns.

pothead

On tips from Stormfax and Muddypaw. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Related Articles

0

This Country Music Star Takes His Support for the Second Amendment to ‘Another Level’

FacebookTwitterEmail The Second Amendment is one of the most important rights protected in the Constitution. And while some country music

1

So When Do We Ban Knives? 14 Injured in Mass Stabbing In Houston

FacebookTwitterEmail Every time a tragedy with a gun happens, liberals come out of the woodwork demanding that we ban guns.

16

The Boys of the Utah National Guard Just Got ‘Busted’ for This Behind-the- Scenes Calendar Shoot That Defines Risque (Video)

FacebookTwitterEmail Well, boys will be boys… Before everyone goes all moral and military code here on me, I’d just like

Share This

Share this post with your friends!