For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
20 More Questions For Barack Obama
Written By : John Hawkins

Because our servile journalists spend their days awash in ecstasy, thinking endlessly of the tingle that runs up their leg when they see Barack Obama, they don’t seem to be able to find the time to ask him any tough questions. That leaves the rest of us out in the cold, dreaming of queries we’d like to see asked of the President of the United States — if our press would turn in its Obama Fan Club memberships and start acting like members of the media again.

With that in mind, just as I did during the 2008 campaign, I’ve come up with 20 questions I’d like to see asked to Barack Obama. If you can find a journalist who remembers why he got into the profession in the first place, send this list over to him. Maybe we still won’t get any answers, but at least the American people will get an idea of some of the questions that people should be asking.

1) Back in 2008, you said that Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Surging electricity rates would seem to be a bad thing under almost any circumstances, but given the state of the economy today, why do you think it’s necessary to see electricity costs dramatically escalate?

2) Even before the stimulus bill, the CBO predicted the economy would recover in the 2nd half of this year. Since we’re already getting to the point where the economy is on track to recover if there had been no stimulus at all, doesn’t that mean the stimulus was a waste of money?

3) Since spending for Social Security and Medicare have gotten so large and out-of-control that it’s imperiling our nation’s financial future, can we really afford another massive new government health care program that has the potential to eventually dwarf both of them combined in cost?

4) Even your own economic team is predicting that you will run large deficits throughout your entire presidency — even if you serve two terms. Given the size of our debt and the nervousness about it around the world, couldn’t that policy have frightening economic implications for our country?

5) You’ve been publicly advocating allowing people who are in the country illegally to remain here and in many cases, start on the path towards citizenship. Setting aside how good of an idea that is in any case, why do you support a policy like that when the unemployment rate is 9.8% and every job held by an illegal means one more American will be out of work?

6) Your administration has been fond of saying that you’ve “created or saved” jobs. Aren’t those numbers made-up and completely unverifiable?

7) When do you anticipate having the government completely out of GM and Chrysler?

8) Doesn’t the special treatment that unions have gotten in the bailout of GM and Chrysler smack of favoritism and political corruption?

9) You’ve imposed certain limits on executive pay. Do you think we should have limits on what actors can make? How about lawyers? Union heads? Musicians? How about how much money someone should be able to make from speaking fees or book royalties?

10) Can you discuss the role you played at ACORN and whether you believe they should be able to receive any federal funds given the enormous ethical problems in that organization that have recently come to light?

11) Aren’t you trying to get around the “advise and consent” clause in the Constitution by hiring so many czars?

12) Isn’t it true that many of your czars have such controversial backgrounds that they couldn’t have been confirmed, even by a heavily Democratic Congress?

13) So far, you have signed a number of bills that no one in Congress has read before they were signed. Do you think a member of Congress is being irresponsible if he signs onto a bill without reading it or at minimum, having a member of his staff read it?

14) Would you be willing to publicly ask your supporters to stop accusing people who disagree with your policies of being racist?

15) You have harshly criticized George Bush for putting prisoners at Gitmo. However, closing the facility turned out to be much tougher than you thought it would be and now, you are not on pace to meet your goal to close it within a year. Do you now believe your criticism of George Bush over the issue was misguided?

16) Given your lack of accomplishments on the world stage, shouldn’t you have refused to accept the Nobel Peace Prize?

17) Many people fear that Manuel Zelaya is a wannabe dictator who was and is still trying to subvert the democratic process in Honduras. He appears to have been thrown out of office in accordance with the Constitution of that nation and moreover, he would have been term limited out of office in November. Why is it important to your administration that Honduras risk its democracy to reinstall Manuel Zelaya as president?

18) Our allies in Eastern Europe feel, with more than a little justification, that we have betrayed them and abandoned them to the Russians by refusing to build out our missile defense program in their countries. At this point, nobody seems to know what you got in return for this. So, what did we gain from Russia in return for throwing our Eastern European friends to the wolves?

19) Iran seems to be slowly, but steadily moving towards building nuclear weapons. Were Iran to acquire nukes, it would lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, a dangerous conflict with Israel, and it could potentially lead to terrorist groups acquiring nuclear weapons. Yet, so far, you seem to be doing nothing of significance to stop Iran. Are you still willing to publicly guarantee that you will do whatever it takes to stop Iran from getting nukes?

20) Time and time again on the campaign trail, you talked about the importance of the fight in Afghanistan. Now, when your general in charge of the country is telling you what he needs to win, you seem to be wavering on giving it to him. Was all your talk about getting the job done in Afghanistan just a cynical political strategy?

0
  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Interesting questions, Mr. Hawkins, but we all know those questions aren't getting within 50 yards of Mr. Obama. He, David Axlerod and Rahm Emmanuel have made sure that substantive questions get tossed into the circular file long before they see the light of Mr. Obama's faux halo. As for the MSM, they've charted a course from which it's going to be extraordinarily difficult to walk back to respectability. In order for them to return to being the loyal fourth estate, the watchdogs of liberty and freedom, they're going to have to negate what's happened for the past 20 years, which is a pretty big ask, and were they to do that, somewhere along the way they'd end up sounding just like HAL 9000 in the Kubrick classic 2001: A Space Odyssey:

    "I know everything hasn't been quite right with me, but I can assure you now, very confidently, that it's going to be all right again. I feel much better now, I really do. Look, Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over. I know I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I've still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission. And I want to help you."

  • Mike_M

    Obama's answer? "Everything is going according to plan." A weakening dollar driven by hideously corrupt overspending and the printing press, rising unemployment, millions added to the welfare rolls, a giant new entitlement on the table, states becoming economically unstable.

    This is the Cloward-Piven playbook and Obama is executing it page by page. The question is not when his economic policies will begin to work, but why he is actively pursuing policies designed to damage instead of help the economy.

    Apparently the "change we can believe in" is to crown Obama as some wild-eyen Wotan, determined to drag the entire country down in a Gotterdamerung of misery and failure so he can rebuild it in his own image.

    Obama's dumb little symbol says it all. The sun of Obama's new order rising over a field of red socialism and white surrender.

  • Jack Schite

    Batak Obama derangement syndrome means asking the kinds of questions now that you would have never posed of George Bush as his wars put us in debt without any benefit.

    John, you know so much why aren't you the president? It's obviously such a breeze you know all the right answers.

  • http://www.comics.com/editoons/asay/ Zheldon

    These newbie trolls are really stupid. They don't even try to go back and look through the archives.

    Here is a tip for you trolls. UNLIKE dems/libs the conservatives DO call out republicans and conservatives.

    Then again, trolls have one purpose in life and it isn't very helpful.

    No, Baradolf "Chimpy" O'Hitler wont answer these questions or anything like them. If you don't play his way you don't get invited to the game.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Com Dick_Nixon

    you know so much why aren't you the president?

    you know so little you remind Nixon of the current POTUS.

  • tblrk2006

    as his wars put us in debt without any benefit.

    Posted by Jack Schite

    2009-10-13 09:24:30

    Dead terrorists are a big benefit.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    You know, Mr. Schite, I think you missed a major point that Mr. Hawkins was making – the people upon whom our society relies to ask those questions have been missing in action with respect to Mr. Obama.

    Mr. Bush faced this type of questioning on a regular basis. Mr. Clinton faced some of this type of questioning, especially as his second term wore on. The elder Mr. Bush certainly faced tough questioning. Mr. Reagan clearly faced lots of intense questioning. Mr. Obama? Not so much.

    So look beyond the content of the questions a bit and ask yourself if it's really OK with you that the press corps and other media types just abdicate their social responsibility to question what those in power are doing? Is that really how you want the press to act?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Batak Obama derangement syndrome means asking the kinds of questions now that you would have never posed of George Bush as his wars put us in debt without any benefit.

    Huh. Apparently Jack_Schite actually was born yesterday.

  • abbymartin812

    I'd love for you to ask him about his unemployment predictions he made just months ago. When he predicted that the unemployment rate would go down, for whom did he mean?

    Since the recession began in December 2007, private sector employment has declined 5.74 percent, while government payroll has grown 0.83 percent.

    If you've had enough, please join me in joining The Free Enterprise nation..

    http://www.TheFreeEnterpriseNation.org

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    When he predicted that the unemployment rate would go down, for whom did he mean?

    China?

  • Pingback: John Hawkins’ Columns | Right Wing News

Advertisement
Featured Video

This Rush Babe is…*gasp* Black!

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info