For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
5 Ugly Truths Americans Will Have to Face
Written By : John Hawkins

“Before I draw nearer to that stone to which you point, answer me one question. Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of the things that May be only?”

Still the Ghost pointed downward to the grave by which it stood.

“Men’s courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead. But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me!”

The Spirit was immovable as ever. — Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol

Even the United States of America is not immune to the rules of nature and commerce that govern other nations. Over the last few decades, our country has made some very foolish economic choices. It seems as if we have come to believe that the rest of the world is going to finance our government spending in perpetuity, even as it becomes clear that we have no intention of getting spending under control or paying back our debt. Because the wheels of history turn very slowly, we’ve gotten away with this for a long time, but as the baby boomers are starting to hit retirement age, the time to pay the piper is drawing nigh. In the next decade or two, we’re likely to face a financial crisis more dire than any this nation has ever seen.

What is that going to mean in real terms? It means that barring an unforeseen miracle, our out-of-control spending is going to lead to some very painful decisions that will make a lot of people, including conservatives, very unhappy. What you’re about to read are the ugly truths about what our behavior today means for our country’s future.

1) Entitlements must be cut. By 2030, the Congressional Budget Office is estimating that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid will make up 75% of our budget spending. In other words, unless we get a handle on entitlement spending, it will be impossible to get our deficits under control. That means the age eligibility for these programs must be raised and the amount spent per person will need to be dropped to try to close the gap between what we take in and what we pay out. Given how explosive this issue is politically, it’s not going to be easy to accomplish. However, it’s not realistic to believe that future generations of Americans are going to be willing to live like indentured servants for decades to support their own personal senior citizen who’s lying around in a hammock somewhere, enjoying a 25 year long retirement. The sooner we start making changes, the easier it will be on everyone and the less shock there will be to the system when the inevitable changes start to take place.

2) Our military is going to weaken. By historical standards, the United States is not spending an extraordinary percentage of our budget on defense. However, we are spending an extraordinary amount of money on defense for a nation that’s flat broke. Is this sustainable? Is China going to keep loaning us the money we need to keep our military going when it’s the only thing standing between them and Taiwan? Are Americans going to keep spending billions to defend foreign countries that are ungrateful for our help when we don’t have enough money at home? The answer to that question is, “No, we’re not.” That’s a shame — because the United States military is doing more to promote world stability than any other 20 nations combined, but we simply can’t afford to keep it up. We’ll be forced to cross our fingers, cut back on military spending, and hope that the world doesn’t completely fall to pieces when the sheriff hangs up his guns.

3) Taxes are going up. Ronald Reagan was right when he said that, “The problem is not that people are taxed too little; the problem is that government spends too much.” Unfortunately, we’ve allowed our government to spend so far beyond its means for so long that it’s going to be almost impossible to close the gap by merely cutting spending. Taxes must go up on the rich, the middle-class, and, yes, even the poor. The whole idea that more than 40% of the population can avoid paying any income taxes at all when we’re running trillion dollar deficits is sheer madness. Everybody is going to end up having to pay more — and sickeningly, it won’t even be for more services; it’ll simply be to pay for what we’ve already spent.

4) Economic growth is going to stagnate. The bigger the government grows and the more it borrows, the less virile the economy becomes. We’ve seen this in Western Europe where policies — of the sort the Obama Administration is now pursuing — have led to the kind of perpetual sluggish growth and jobless rates we associate with economic downturns in this country. As the Congressional Budget Office has said:

Large budget deficits would reduce national saving, leading to more borrowing from abroad and less domestic investment, which in turn would depress economic growth in the United States. Over time, accumulating debt would cause substantial harm to the economy.

Less growth means less jobs, less prosperity, and handing future generations of Americans a country that doesn’t hold as much promise as the one that we grew up in.

5) We will have a world where the United States isn’t a super power. As the growth of the US economy slows, our military declines, and we become ever more dependent on the foreign powers that hold our debt, the United States will cease to become a super power. We won’t have the cashflow to engage in another Marshall Plan, the manufacturing capacity to gear up as we did in World War II, or the dominant military needed to score decisive victories over our opponents. Certainly, the United States won’t become completely insignificant, but Reagan’s description of our nation as a “shining city” above the rest of humanity will no longer be true. Instead of being a colossus striding the globe — we’ll be like Russia, China, France, Britain, or Germany — just one of many.

Are these events that “will be” or “may be?” If we depart from the course our nation is on, will “the ends” change for our nation or are we too far gone down the road to serfdom? Sadly, we’ve run so aggressively towards a socialist oblivion that our country may be on the backside of the mountain and unable to climb back to the top. Time will tell, but after all the privileges we’ve had growing up as Americans in this great nation, we have a solemn duty to bear whatever we must as a country to pass on the promise, the potential, and the dream of America to future generations.

0
  • Mike_M

    That may be a bit pessimistic. Much of our future depends on how deeply we are willing to cut entitlements, which account for 60% of the Federal budget and around 50% for most state budgets. The media is trying to make hay out of trashing Bunning for holding up a benefits bill, but conservatives have to start forcing the issue now before we become Greece.

    The world should fear our military budget woes more than we do ourselves. No foreign invader could possibly set foot on US soil, but we will leave power vacuums when we pull troops and bases out of overseas locations. I suspect much of the world is going to be longing for American arrogance and cowboy interventionism when Russia, China, and the Islamic states expand their spheres of influence.

    As far as our long term outlook, the United States is still a powerful and advantaged country. We have an educated and productive workforce, vast resources, good infrastructure, a positive birth rate, and are a destination for immigrants and entrepreneurs because of our opportunities and freedoms. Much of the rest of the civilized world is defficient in at least one of those catagories, the countries that are in trouble now are in several.

    One thing is for certain though, we had our window for being a superpower welfare state when we were the only country left standing after WWII. That scenario is over. This is when we choose to be one or the other…either a capitalist superpower that values self-reliance, or a socialist welfare state forever stuck in a twilight of high taxes, high unemployment, and low productivity.

  • Power_System_Oper

    I Read the whole article John.

    So, you prove to be a realist after all and admit that taxes are going up. (Inconvenient Truth #3).

    The fox is now out of the hen house after too many years of the Democrats and Republicans running up debt to pay for wars and entitlement programs. Its now time to pay the piper.

    I blame our side the most. Not because we we were advocates for out of control spending, but because we helped elect Presidents and memebers of Congress who tickled our ears with general fluff about spending cuts. Trouble is, we never held those people’s feet to the fire regarding thsoe spending cuts once they were in office We jsut sttod by and helped keep them in office even when they kept throwing us under the bus in regards to spending cuts.

  • tblrk2006

    So, you prove to be a realist after all and admit that taxes are going up. (Inconvenient Truth #3).

    Posted by Power_System_Oper
    2010-03-02 09:42:38

    OBama himself said they will go up….this is not a secret. We KNOW he isnt going to cut spending.

  • Mr_e_m_t

    John, did you have a V8 drink before writing this?
    You’re leaning left these days.

    Did you even look up how much the IRS reports collecting annually before deciding that we are going to have to tax our way out of the dept we let our “Dear Leaders” send us into?
    Five minutes on the web and I got this answer:

    IRS reported collecting a total of almost $2.4 trillion after refunds, with $248.6 billion of that coming from individual taxpayers.
    http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0,,id=168593,00.html

    That is from personal income taxes garnished from wages alone.
    That isn’t counting the taxes the government collects from adding taxes to products, that are also taxed from the producers. That isn’t counting tobacco taxes, gambling taxes, import/export, property, etc..etc..etc.

    I know you and some other libs are going to scream now about how this goes towards services we need… “Feed the teachers, feed the poor, pay for someones false teeth!”

    Feed the politicians making six digit salaries, feed unions that are paying Illinois public teachers average 200k each in annual salary, airports to nowhere, government department agencies that are outdated and useless (Rail road commissioner when railroad falls under state DOT. And lets not forget Oporculus plus bank/auto bail outs etc.

    You say we need more of our money to go in places it has no business in going to John, I say get bent.

  • StanInTexas

    I blame our side the most.
    Posted by Power_System_Oper 2010-03-02 09:42:38

    So do I. The Liberals have tripled the defecit in the past year and are trying to blame everyone but themselves.

  • StanInTexas

    So, you prove to be a realist after all and admit that taxes are going up. (Inconvenient Truth #3).

    Posted by Power_System_Oper 2010-03-02 09:42:38

    When your household or business spending are out of control, a pay raise or additional income is nice, but not necessary to resolving the issue.

    Live within your means, stop spending money you don’t that you don’t have or need to spend, pay down/off your debt. Only then is it OK to take that trip or buy that new TV.

    Raising taxes should be the last thing done, only after all this other crap is under control.

  • Mike_M

    Taxes probably should go up on the poor. Our tax structure is progressive to the point of being counterproductive. When such a small pool of people are paying such a huge proportion of the tax (the top 5% pays 40% of the tax), and fluctuation in that population has a huge effect on revenue. Conversely, there will always be a large pool of burger flippers and janitors that can provide a steady tax base in the best and worst of times. They shouldn’t be expected to pay a lot, but when 40% of the people have been taken off the tax rolls entirely, it’s a problem.

    This just illustrates the need for some kind of flat tax or vastly simplified tax code. I’m even on board with the Fair Tax after long being opposed to its rebate-dependent methodology. Just fixing the tax code and doing nothing else would give this country a huge economic boost and lead to hiring and entrepreneurship instantly.

    Unfortunately, the lawyers, liberals, and career politicians that run this country are more interested in their own wealth and power than the freedom and success of the country as a whole. They’re happy to lord over a declining and bankrupt country rather than surrender their control.

  • tblrk2006

    Posted by Mike_M
    2010-03-02 10:31:36

    Dont ever expect them to do something that will work.

  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    No foreign invader could possibly set foot on US soil

    Unless they walk north from Mexico.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by Mike_M
    2010-03-02 10:31:36

    Mike I’ve been a flat tax advocate since Forbes ran for POTUS. At this point the tax code be simplified to:

    X% of income over a certain minimum based on an a variable that Congress has to change. My specific formula would be

    15% of gross income over 1.5*($7.25(current federal Min Wage) * 2080(the standard 40hr work for 52 weeks)).

    The floor is then $22,620, so each INDIVIDUAL would pay 15% of all income over the $22,620. The floor respresents a reasonable ‘poverty’ threshold and still taxes everyone equally. By NOT allowing for any other deductions, the rich and the middle class all pay in more than enough to cover those whose salaries are less than the threshold. Taxes could still be withheld by employers, at a rate specified by the employee, and refunds paid IF they over pay.

  • Pingback: 5 Ugly Truths Americans Will Have to Face | NewsReal Blog

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I fear at this point, the only way to dig out of the inconceivable debt the Democrats have thrown on our backs is to raise taxes.

  • President_Friedman

    Raising taxes will never be a politically viable solution in our open democracy. Whoever tries to do it will get slaughtered on election day.

    Which leads to one of the most important ugly truths John neglected to mention: Inflation. In the absence of political resolve to really fix the root of our problems, our government will have no choice in the coming years but to print more money in order to meet its obligations (botht to creditors and to pay for entitlements).

    Inflation. It’s coming. Be prepared.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    The fox is now out of the hen house after too many years of the Democrats and Republicans running up debt to pay for wars and entitlement programs. Its now time to pay the piper.

    Agreed. The question now is why you voted for Obama when you knew full well that Obama fully supported all of Bush’s spending increases?

    Do men like you enjoy being douchebags, piglet?

  • Mike_M

    “15% of gross income over 1.5*($7.25(current federal Min Wage) * 2080(the standard 40hr work for 52 weeks))”

    Works for me. We’ll keep employer witholdings, but only have them kick in after the poverty threshold has been reached. Everybody’s first $22-grand is tax-free. So if you’re a low wage earner, that money stays in your pocket instead of being held by the government. Most middle class workers would begin paying tax somewhere between April and June.

    You would still file a tax return, but mainly for the purpose of verifying your income and making sure witholdings jive if you have several income sources. We could solve a lot of those problems by designating one job as the “primary” which pays no tax until the threshold, and other jobs would just take the straight 15% from the beginning.

    I’m having a hard time coming up with any drawbacks to that system.

  • whats_up

    Posted by bthewolf
    2010-03-02 11:33:29

    That would work as long as there were no loopholes, none for anyone.

  • Mike_M

    “That would work as long as there were no loopholes, none for anyone.”

    That’s the whole idea.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    You would still file a tax return, but mainly for the purpose of verifying your income and making sure witholdings jive if you have several income sources. We could solve a lot of those problems by designating one job as the “primary” which pays no tax until the threshold, and other jobs would just take the straight 15% from the beginning.

    I’m having a hard time coming up with any drawbacks to that system.
    Posted by Mike_M
    2010-03-02 12:33:58

    The second job thing is the only major flaw/issue, but if youwere to take that second jobs and ELECT to withhold 15% up front or whatever: worst case you’d owe or get a refund!!

    That would work as long as there were no loopholes, none for anyone.
    Posted by whats_up
    2010-03-02 12:40:13

    That’s the idea not even deductions for kids, IRA contributions etc., instead all these would be after tax dollars. And heck that even eliminates the whole marriage penalty/bonus. because every person who earns INCOME pays the tax on anything they earn over the FLOOR.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    For those set on taxing corporations a similar simple formula can be used. (Net profits – 100K) * 10% = taxes owed.

    This would mean small business not pulling in at least 100K in profit would pay no tax at all, but all companies pay something if they make at least that much.

  • Mike_M

    “That’s the idea not even deductions for kids, IRA contributions etc., instead all these would be after tax dollars.”

    And to head off the usual freak-out of “omg, no mortgage deductions!”

    *You’re not paying the tax to begin with!*

    Which is better, to pay the tax then have it refunded via a deduction, or never pay the tax in the first place? Obviously, to not pay the tax at all. When your entire tax burden decreases, you reap the rewards immediately.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I still prefer eliminating the entire tax system and deductions at present and in its place offering a federal VAT.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    I say get bent.
    Posted by Mr_e_m_t
    2010-03-02 10:12:55

    Sure thing Mayor McCheese

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    I’ve said it before that I’m a fan of the flat tax. I’d like the idea extended to all corporations and non-profits as well, each with it’s own threshold. It will only really work (and by that I mean be judged as equitable) if there are absolutely no deductions, exemptions or credits. Think tax forms and instructions which would fit on a postcard!

    I’ve been looking through my materials on flat tax and I can’t find the particular analysis I’m looking for, but as my memory serves, this analysis pointed toward a flat tax being revenue neutral as compared to our current system at around a 7% tax rate. But that’s provided that everyone contributes – individuals, corporations and non-profits.

    For practical reasons, I’d think that a flat rate of 10% would be easier to deal with, simply because the calculations are so very easy (you’re just moving the decimal point one place to the left, after all).

    I’m opposed to the any form of withholding taxes, however. Every other organization with which you have financial dealings manages to do just fine by billing/invoicing you for your indebtedness – why can’t governments? If the defence of withholding taxes is down to spreading out the cash flow to the government over the whole year (which is the defence I usually hear for withholding taxes) then why not make the tax year dependent on taxpayers DOB, or date of incorporation/dba filing? That would distribute the revenue stream more evenly across the year.

    I’d even be happy to entertain a system in which we had a combination of a flat income tax and a VAT. Imagine having a flat income tax rate of 5% and a 5% VAT on non-food purchases. Oh, and get rid of about 40% – 60% of government spending.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    If we cut down the federal government’s spending to constitutional levels, that would mean we would need only about half the tax rate we have now. A 6% VAT alone would probably bring in all we’d need.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by martinhale
    2010-03-02 15:09:12

    The only I reason I said 15% was to retire our current debt which can/should be paid down to less than 1% of GDP.

    Otherwise deductions are NONE, just the povery lvl threshold.

    Also the reason I prefer to have my taxes withheld by the employer is because I don’t want to NOT have the cash on hand when I file my taxes. But then why couldn’t individuals pay their income taxes monthly or even quarterly?

  • DrEvil

    On top of any other changes, eliminate withholding and make everyone write a check on a monthly/quarterly basis. It may not be as efficient as withholding but it would be a wakeup call to most people who would finally realize how much they pay in income taxes. When they read about government waste it will be more “real’ to them because either they just sent a check to that same wasteful government or they are getting ready to write a check to that same wasteful government. 40% of the population couldn’t care less about tax policy and spending as long as they don’t have to pay for it and as long as they receive their goodies from Uncle Sugar. make them pay even a moderate amount and they will start to care about waste by the government.

    Have an Evil day

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by Christopher_Taylor
    2010-03-02 15:17:56

    I’m all for it IF we can cut the spending!!!!!

    And heck, to pay for a war, just bump up the VAT to 6.5 or 7% until the troops come home.

  • Jack Schite

    The most important reality to face is that government policies have let rich keep a disproportionate amount of the country’s wealth since Reagan ran the national debt up to what were then astronomical proportions. Once you figure out government policy is what accounts for the economic disparity in this country, you’ll join the left to call for social justice.

  • Power_System_Oper

    Why will taxes go up?

    Because the Bush tax cuts automatically expire in 2011.

    Why will the Bush tax cuts automatically expire in 2011?

    Becuase a spineless GOP controlled congress pushed them through by the process of reconcilliation while having no guts to push through corresponding spending cuts by reconcilliation.

    Why did that matter? Because reconcilliation rules require that budget changes made via reconcilliation automatically expire after 5 years if those changes are still adding to the federal deficit. The Bush tax cuts without corresponding spending cuts proved to be unsustainable after 5 years and adding to the budget deficit.

  • prius04

    1) Entitlements must end…..

    You are absolutely correct on this one. You see, unlike Germany, England, Japan, Brazil, France, Spain, Canada and nearly every other first world country on the planet, the USA is too poor to afford to keep it's elderly out of poverty.

  • prius04

    2) Or military is going to weaken….

    Only if we wake up. The US spends more on defense then every other country on the planet COMBINED. So while we spend trillions in Iraq protecting oil profits, Japan is building a mega subway system for Tokyo.

  • prius04

    3) Taxes are going to go up.

    From about 1932 to about 1980, taxes on the rich varied between 70% and 92%. The same years we cured poverty in the elderly, built an interstate highway system from scratch, landed on the moon subsidized health care for the elderly and the poor, won WW2 and rebuilt Europe after WW2 and about 1000 other things. Now that the top tax rate on the rich is down to 36%, we can't even afford to keep our bridges up, never mind building the system from scratch.

  • prius04

    3) Economic growth is going to stagnate. ..

    You mean like middle class wages have stagnated since the election of RR?
    There used to be a time in American history when the rich paid real tax rates and there was substantial regulation on big business. That time coincided with the years 1930 to about 1980. That time also coincided with the time in American history when this nation screamed forward in prosperity and wealth and progress and education and culture. And that was the time when parents could assume their kids would always be better off, because they almost always were. That was the time when liberal policies were in the majority. It was the time when the unions were the most powerful. It was the time when America worked. Now since about 1980, conservatism is the most powerful ideology in America. That is the real reason our economy will stagnate. Invest in the common man, like liberals have always done, you get the boom that was the years 1930 to about 1980. But when you invest in the wealthy, and promote trickle down economics, not so much for the common American, and therefore, not so much for America.

  • prius04

    5) We will have a world where the US is not a super power….

    Right again. The US will thrive as a super nation when all Americans thrive and when the nation feels that it's wealth needs to be invested in it's people, with programs to raise up those citizens. Better schools and better infrastructure and more Pell grants and the like.
    But over the last 30 years, since the election of your sainted RR, we've been de-investing in the common American and instead investing and promoting the needs and desires of the corporations and the rich. So of course America will eventually stagnate.

    Make no mistake about it, I'm not for abolishing the rich, nor abolishing capitalism. I just think the balance is now off. From 1776 to about 1930, the USA either thru the lack of law or the design of law, promoted the needs of the rich over the common American. America did OK for itself. But from about 1930 to about 1980, we put some balance in our nation and promoted the needs of the common American and weakened the control the corporations had over us. We didn't destroy the corporations, nor did we tax the rich into oblivion. We simply weakened those corporations by making things fairer for the common American. We empowerd commoners by weakening the rich. And this nation, as I said before, screamed forward in progress.

    But since the right wingers took over, not so much for common Americans, and not so much for America. So as long as Americans continue to vote Republican, or continue to vote for conservative democrats, America itself will decline. The rich will be OK, they always are. But America won't be.

  • prius04

    The Republican party exists to promote the needs of the rich, but there are not enough rich to win elections. So they have to dupe the rest of us to vote Republican thru blogs such as this.

    And since the 1960s, the Democratic party has moved so far to the right, it's only slightly better for common non-duped Americans to vote for them, but at least it's slightly better.

  • ananomouspatriot

    America is the best country in the world. Nuff said.

  • Pingback: Of ugly truths and such « Lorem ipsum

  • Anonymous

    About time, brfore you murder innocent civilians for oil.

  • Anonymous

    About time, before you murder any more innocent civilians for oil!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YDFEGKDD7VOB35U3W3ZNFXRLU4 daniel

      You ignorant piece of Sh*t. While our armed forces are dying for your freedom you have the audacity to make a comment like that? reevaluate your way of thinking and start realizing the sacrifices people make so your standard or living is in the top .05% in the world…. idiot

  • Anonymous

    A few simple questions even GW Bush could answer:
    1. Who set up and financed Al Queda?
    2. Did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11?
    3. Were and WMD found in Iraq?
    4. How is killing 1.5 million Iraqis contributing to my freedom?
    5. Were there any rich American kids killed in the war?

    Maybe you should start thinking (i.e. if eating junk food still hasn’t killed all your brain cells)

  • http://merchant.auctivacommerce.com/s16220/Chicago-Blackhawks-Jersey-19-Jonathan-Toews-Jersey-NHL-Jersey-P745168.aspx Jonathan Toews Jersey

    awesome writing, very interesting. I like it in deed. I come acoss your writing by google search engine. I will visit your site frequently and share it to my classmates. Please keep it fresh. Keep on the good work. – A football fun

  • Pingback: John Hawkins’ Columns | Right Wing News

Advertisement
Featured Video

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info