For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
A Seven Item Tea Party Agenda for a GOP House
Written By : John Hawkins

One of the lines we’ve heard again and again from the Left and even from mediocre Republicans like Bob Bennett and Lindsey Graham is that the Tea Party has no agenda. The idea is supposed to be that the Tea Party is just a bunch of slack-jawed, backwoods hillbillies who are rallying against progress and a black President. Of course, this is not true. The reason the Tea Party exists is because patriotic Americans all across this country are deeply concerned about our nation’s future.

Now, there is no “Tea Party leader” or any one person who can speak for the Tea Party. Still, I’ve attended Tea Parties, I’ve spoken at Tea Parties (here and here) and I think I have a pretty good grip on what people at the Tea Parties want. It goes without saying that they want to get the deficit under control, they want Congress to start paying attention to the Constitution, and they’re going to ferociously oppose any big new government programs like Cap and Trade.

That being said, Tea Partiers tend to be considerably more informed than the average person about politics; so most of them are well aware of the legislative limitations we’ll face if the GOP takes back the House, but doesn’t control the Senate or the presidency. Additionally, it’s no secret that the American people and the Republican base have very little confidence in the GOP. So, let’s be honest here: if the GOP takes the House back, it will be because of the American people’s deep dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party, not their love for the Republican Party.

With that in mind, it makes sense to have a humble, limited agenda that helps rebuild the American people’s confidence in the GOP’s ability to govern. Here are seven doable agenda items that can help make that happen.

1) Kill earmarks: Earmarks don’t make up a large percentage of the budget, but they have become a tremendous corrupting influence on Congress. The American people believe, quite correctly, that campaign contributors give money to congressmen and they pay them back for the favor by funneling millions of dollars in earmarks their way. We will not have an honest government in this country as long as this practice continues.

2) Read the bills: During Obama’s tenure, we’ve been treated to massive bills that have been passed without ANYBODY actually reading them from end-to-end. This is simply unacceptable to the American people. Yes, every congressman might not read every bill, but at least their staff should read the bills so that they can inform them about what they’re voting on. When I interviewed him, Rand Paul said he believed Congress should have to wait one day for every 20 pages of a bill before it’s voted upon. That seems to be a fairly reasonable proposition.

3) Kill the funding for Obamacare: To fully repeal Obamacare, you need to control the House, have 60 votes in the Senate, and control the Presidency. That’s not going to be the case in 2011. Still, the GOP won’t be helpless. To the best of my knowledge, I was the first person to suggest that the GOP simply refuse to fund Obamacare if it takes back the House,

“The IRS might have to hire as many as 16,000 new employees to enforce all the new taxes and penalties the bill calls for! And that doesn’t include all the other government jobs from the 159 new agencies, panels, commissions and departments this bill will create.”

What does it take to fund all those government jobs, agencies, panels, & commissions? Tax dollars.

Now, who controls the purse strings? Congress. …So, can we gut Obamacare by refusing to fund it? YES. WE. CAN. Is this a viable strategy? Yes, it is.

Defunding Obamacare isn’t as good as repealing it, but it can stop the bill in its tracks until we do have the votes to repeal it.

4) Security first border proposal: Even the most diehard advocates of amnesty and open borders in Congress claim to be for security when they’re called on it. So, if the GOP takes back the House, there will be an opportunity to separate the wheat from the chaff by passing a tough new security law that finishes building the fence, adds more border patrol agents, beefs up interior enforcement, severely penalizes businesses that knowingly hire illegals, ends catch and release programs for people of all nationalities, and does a better job of tracking people who come into America on VISAS. Then, the American people will be able to see once and for all who on Capitol Hill wants to actually end illegal immigration — and who just gives lip service to the idea while privately doing everything possible to make sure the border remains open.

5) Investigate, investigate, investigate: The Obama Administration has been engaging in more than a few questionably legal maneuvers with no oversight of significance from Congress. If the GOP takes over the House, it will get subpoena power and it can start to get the sort of answers the public has been waiting for in the Sestak/Romanoff bribery case, the dropped Black Panther prosecutions, and the partisan corruption of the census — among other issues. Barack Obama has been treated as above the law by the Democrats in Congress and it’s about time that his administration is forced to start playing by the rules.

6) Get the government out of private industry: Congress controls the purse strings and it can make sure that not another dime goes to fund bailouts at private companies or at Freddie and Fannie. Moreover, the GOP needs to do what it can to move the government out of private industry as quickly as possible. We need to work to get the government out of the banks, the car companies, and student loan industry by 2012. If that means some companies go out of business, that’s unfortunate, but any corporation that can only survive with the government’s help deserves to go out of business. Although it’s probably too much to hope for, that should apply to corporate welfare for farms and inefficient alternative sources of energy as well.

7) Pay for all new spending: Here’s a simple rule: Any NEW spending, including “emergency spending,” has to be paid for by cutting spending from other places in the budget. This will flatten the growth of government, impose spending discipline as the “new normal” in D.C., and get people used to the idea of cutting government programs — something that has rarely happened in recent years. If the GOP can do at least that much, in combination with stopping earmarks and preventing Obamacare from being implemented, it can restore its reputation for responsible governance and fiscal discipline while setting the stage for the sort of gains we need in 2012 to get the country back on track fiscally.

0
  • President Friedman

    My ideal Tea Party agenda would look a little different (IMHO it needs some bigger, grander, more tranformational things in it, but just one or two), but this would still be a great agenda. And there is no reason this has to be limited to the Tea Party. I was watching Cornyn and Sessions debating Menendez and Hollen on Meet The Press last weekend, and it was very apparent to me that the GOP *still* does not have a clear, coherent, and enumerated agenda should they win back power. If they don't remedy this very soon it is going to hurt them in some of the closer races.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C3IKAXMRVZNEU5BZKUD7LK6WBA Pete Moss

    Earmarks: This is your #1 proposal? A minuscule part of the budget that goes to fund projects that are hard to fund otherwise, but are for the most part worthwhile expenditures? No wonder your party is accused of lacking ideas.

    Read the bills: Oh give us a break John. You want to make it like they're suddenly not reading the bills, but they used to, because you don't like the content of the bills being passed.

    Obamacare: Please kill the funding for this, and while you are at it get rid of social security. That will be the end of your party, finally.

    The border: You want to lock it down. What do you propose be done with all the people already here illegally? Again, same old failed ideas from your side that address only half the issue.

    Investigate: Yeah John, Obama is corrupt but the Bush administration could torture people while you turn a blind eye. You lack any credibility when it comes to addressing possible corruption.

    I was just watching Meet the Press, which I recorded. Like Friedman says below, the GOP has no ideas. Leaders lead, they don't follow opinion polls.

    • StanW

      More whining and lies from the Mouth of the Left.

      No surprises there, Pete!

    • President Friedman

      Earmarks: As John very clearly spelled out, the problem with earmarks isn't the percentage of the budget they represent, but the coercive power they yield. I got into a heated exchange with my Rep. Tom Coburn about this at a Town Hall meeting a few years ago, and he basically agreed with you Pete, and have refused to support him ever since. However, I would say that my solution probably wouldn't be to end earmarks, but to amend the legislative system so that proposed bills can only do one thing, which must be spelled out in their title. No more attaching college loan reform to a healthcare bill. No more huge 'comprehensive' reform bills. If a law is worth passing, it should be worth passing on its own merits.

      Read the bills: Yeah, go ahead and argue against reading the bills and see how far that gets you. You seem to forget that the Tea Party movement is just as disgusted with past Republican performance as it is with current Democratic performance.

      Obamacare: Of course, John didn't say anything about social security, only about cutting funding to Obamacare. So what is your point?

      The Border: I tend to agree w/ Mr. Dalasio below that this, while important, shouldn't necessarily be a Tea Party platform… but the point is, you can get a lot of immediate and broad support for sealing up the border while saving the argument about what to do w/ the illegals who are already here for later. See, that's what is known in politics as “a bipartisan solution”, although we admittedly haven't seen any of these since Bush was president, so it's kind of hard to recognize them. The sick things is that there are politicians out there (from both parties) who would rather not implement a bipartisan solution if it means they can't get a compromise on the more contentious stuff they want to do .

      Investigate: I'm not so big on this one.

      As for the Meet The Press show, it is worth noting that while the GOP doesn't seem to have a coherent plan, I think you'll find a lot of voters (myself included) who will take “no coherent plan” over “incredibly naive, shortsighted, and financially ruinous plan”.

    • Mr. EMT

      “Baa baa baa” said the sheep named passion flower.

      Keep making excuses for abuse and corruption from your leaders.
      I am gonna be enjoying the day of reckoning that's coming.

      • Trench_Raider

        Heh…yeah the “passion flower” thing was amusing. But to be fair, that was probably not a valid email address. I ought to email it using a “troll mail” acocunt to see what comes back. Just as I suspect that “Pete Moss” is actually a “secondary mark” or someone he wants to cause trouble for for.

        Oh yes, and have I asked today why this child is still posting?

        TR

    • Trench_Raider

      The border: You want to lock it down. What do you propose be done with all the people already here illegally?

      Round up and deport as many as possible, enthusiasticly enforce existing laws, pass AZ style laws in other border states, penalize employers in a draconian manner, and wave “bye-bye” as many of the rest self-deport.

      The example of the 1950's “Operation Wetback” deportation effort shows that if you create a hostile enough enviorment, then many of the criminals will self deport.

      How does that sound, child?

      TR

    • Christopher_Taylor

      I can't figure out if the left is really that blind and clueless about the massive opposition to the Government Health Insurance Takeover Act or they just want to believe there isn't any and pretend boldly in public.

  • billdalasio

    I'll probably get flamed for this, but I think item 4 (Security first border proposal) should probably not be on a “Tea Party” agenda. As worthwhile a goal as it is, it really dilutes the message. Everything else on the list, and the Tea Parties overall, have focused on an out-of-control government with little accountability and ever-more-grandiose visions for engineering society. As worthwhile as border security might be, including it as a plank on a Tea Party agenda only serves to make the message less clear. Moreover, as far as I can tell, it really does create a wedge issue that undermines the agenda's effectiveness.

  • Christopher_Taylor

    I agree with the bulk of that but I don't really see that as a Tea Party agenda. Its a conservative wish list, but not really the Tea Party Movement.

    If I had to guess it would be more like this:

    1) Cut spending
    2) Retain Bush Tax Cuts
    3) Roll back the Government Health Insurance Takeover Act
    4) End government takeovers of business like GM
    5) Greater transparency
    6) Kill the Stimulus package.

    That's just a guess based on what I've read of different Tea Party speeches and sites.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info