For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The 5 Biggest Threats To America’s Future Success
Written By : John Hawkins

Douglas MacArthur once said that, “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.” As it is with old soldiers, so it goes with nations. When you watch “end of the world” movies on TV, America may be overrun by zombies, hit by asteroids, destroyed by aliens, annihilated by a climate gone mad — and so it may be. However, the history books teach another lesson. For the most part, great nations do not usually disappear; they become progressively weaker, more decadent, less flexible, and slowly, almost imperceptibly decline until some great event comes along that lays bare their newly vulnerable condition before the world. This tragedy has played out again and again on the world stage in Greece, the Roman Empire, Britain, the Soviet Union and in hundreds of lesser nations. Do you believe the United States is immune? We’re not. People who study history know this. Conservatives know this. It’s why we’re concerned about,

1) Our national debt: We’re already paying out far more money than we’re taking in, our politicians don’t have any sort of feasible plan to pay for what we’ve already spent, and there’s no way we can possibly pay out all the money the government currently owes for entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and Obamacare. Unless we change course dramatically, the United States could be headed towards the same sort of economic collapse that nations like Argentina and Post-WWI Germany experienced. Despite the very real danger, most of America’s political elite seem to be completely unaware that THEY can’t continue spending more money than WE have forever.

2) Weapons of mass destruction going off in American cities: It’s ironic that so much of the world once lived in fear of a nuclear exchange between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union may have been an “evil empire,” but at least the leaders were rational. Can we say the same about Pakistan? Maybe. For the moment. How about North Korea? Absolutely not. What about Iran? No way — and if Iran gets nukes, another half dozen, barely functional Middle Eastern nations will soon follow it into the nuclear club.
We’re rapidly moving into a world where unstable basket-case nations run by dictators and religious fanatics are going to be equipped with weapons capable of incinerating whole cities from hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Soon, we could even have terrorists setting off nuclear bombs in American cities without the United States being able to identify who supplied them with the weapons. Incidentally, that can already be done with dirty bombs, chemical weapons, and biological weapons.

Yet, what’s the reaction from America’s Left and much of the world? A yawn and a shrug of the shoulders. Ask yourself whether terrorists could conceivably acquire nukes from a nation like North Korea or Iran. The answer is “Yes, they could.” Ask yourself whether a group like Al-Qaeda would be ready, willing, and able to set those bombs off in American cities. Obviously, the answer to that is “yes.” Now, imagine the world-shattering impact of nuclear bombs going off in New York, D.C., LA, and Chicago tomorrow. The human lives lost. The unimaginable financial cost. The millions of survivors, bodies burned and wasted with radiation sickness. Now, ask yourself if we’re doing enough to make North Korea and Iran nuclear free. If your answer is “yes,” re-read this paragraph again.

3) A cultural apocalypse: Every generation bemoans the sorry state of the generation following it. That’s a constant across time, geography, and nations. For this reason, worries about the state of a culture often produce, “Oh, it’s just another boy crying wolf” eye rolls. Therein lies the danger: In the fairy tale, a wolf DID eventually show up and eat the flock while people ignored the warnings. Except with our culture, there’s not just a wolf.

Instead there is a plethora of different threats preying on the supports that keep our country upright. Not only is patriotism sneered at in many corners of the country, outright hatred of America is treated as a legitimate viewpoint on the Left. We’ve combined a historically massive influx of immigrants to our country with multiculturalism that encourages them not to assimilate into our culture. The sort of creeping Islamization that has newspapers too afraid to show cartoons of Muhammad and a triumphant mosque being built at Ground Zero are not allowed to be mentioned in polite company. We have a mainstream media and entertainment industry that glorifies hedonism, narcissism, and socialism while it demonizes Christianity, capitalism, and conservatism. Will any of those factors cripple the country? Maybe. Maybe not. But, what we can say with certainty is that all of those trends are potentially dangerous and none of them is good for the country.

4) The government as a parent: Our overweening government has usurped many of the responsibilities once taken care of by individuals and their families. From birth to death, our government has inserted itself into every part of our lives. It schools your children. It’s in charge of student loans. It handles your health care. Its regulations often determine whether your business survives or fails. If you’re out of a job, the government pays the unemployment or the welfare. It takes care of the less fortunate. When you retire, it takes care of the Medicare and Social Security. If there’s any part of your life you believe the government isn’t impacting significantly, then you’re either uninformed or the government just hasn’t quite gotten around to it yet.

Too few people ask the question, “What is this doing to us as a people?” As Elizabeth Scalia has said,

When nothing matters and you answer for nothing, you’re living the life of a child, and a nation of children cannot survive for very long.

5) Moral decay: Like cultural erosion, moral decay is another of those oft diagnosed sicknesses that usually turn out to be less of a threat than we might imagine. That’s not only because people tend to romanticize the past, but because we often fear change. Yet, moral threats are not a small issue.
Despite the fact that just about every study imaginable shows children tend to do better in two parent homes, we’ve had an explosion of children born out of wedlock and divorce. That has a lot to do with the fact that we have more people locked up in prisons than any other nation in the world. It’s also why more than 50 million American children have been slaughtered in abortion mills, a number that’s comparable not just to the Holocaust, but to the total number of people who were wiped out in WWII. Yet, many people see no danger in gay marriage, no peril in denigrating Christianity, and no cause for alarm in declining moral values.

This is a terrible mistake because if America ever ceases to be a good nation, its days as a great nation will be numbered.

0
  • Rorschach256

    And every single one of them derives from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington DC, in a weird office without any corners or obvious doors.

  • http://twitter.com/ElwinRansom1 Elwin Ransom

    Thanks, John. As always, you're clear, concise, and cut through the PC (political crap) to get to the heart of the issue.

  • President Friedman

    I think education has to be on that list somewhere. The Founding Fathers had many reservations, and provided many balances against, the tyranny of the masses. History has since shown us that the masses, when making informed decisions, are at least as good (if not also reliably as poor) at ruling a nation as are an aristocratic elite (which many of the Founders had an appreciation of and tried to preserve somewhat in our Constitution) or a tyrannical genius. But when these decisions are informed by 30-second media soundbytes (from whichever self-affirming media outlets you subscribe to), bumper sticker philosophy, and the fashionable opinions of pop culture superstars, instead of from a serious study of history tempered by critical thinking, logic, and a functional understanding of rights theory and the political process… well, you get what we have today: a wide swath of voters who only react, somewhat mindlessly, to whatever the party in power is doing, with no real ideological agenda for how to set things right. The only thing that can fix this is teaching people how to think (and I don't mean how to think the same thoughts, but how to critically and systematically engage an idea and come to a logical conclusion about its effectiveness and viability… a process that can give birth to contentious ambitions from both liberal and conservative spheres).

    • baoxian

      In essence, everybody is more or less equally stupid, and the Constitution was designed to mitigate the damage any one group or individual can cause.

      It's brilliant in its simplicity.

      That's not even intended as sarcasm or disrespect. How many of us are really experts in any field? How many of those experts know crap about anything else? How many people can combine their expertise with the management skill needed to organize and motivate others? Finally how many of those people can combine all of the above with the political savvy to either get elected or appointed to a position where they can make a difference? Probably a few dozen…in the entire history of the country.

      The idea of an “enlightened elite” is a myth. Yeah, some people are smarter than others, but by how much and in how many areas? Hell, *George Washington* was a farmer, and one of the biggest failures of his Presidency was inciting the Whiskey Rebellion by signing a tax increase that economically hurt…farmers!

      The mob and the elite are equally dumb, and the only way to keep things from going too far out of whack is to use them to keep the other in check. That's the central idea that came from a group of people we generally recognize as the smartest and most capable of their time, and recent history. Think about that.

      • President Friedman

        Absolutely, very well said. You perfectly described the genius the founders landed on after dividing the direct democracy components of ancient Greece by the pure republican rule of early Rome. I think many of the Founders, being part of the 'elite' of their day, were more suspiscious of 'the mob' than we generally are today, and this was especially true of Adams and Hamilton.

        But the greater point I was trying to make is that, even if the mob and the elite are equally dumb, there is a modicum of intellectual ability, foresight, and restraint both must posess in order to preserve our future, and as a society we seem to be failing at all three.

    • Christopher_Taylor

      I agree strongly with this. We have to have a better-informed public in addition to a more virtuous public, or the republic cannot survive.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

    “We have met the enemy, and he is us” – Walt Kelly, creator of Pogo

    Always liked that quote of his, and it seems ever so relevant these days.

  • Fiza1

    “1) Our national debt: We're already paying out far more money than we're taking in,”

    Check the plot here and find the “knee of the curve” where the runaway growth in debt started.

    http://www.metronetiq.com/archives/national%20debt/nat...

    Then find the next “inflection point”,where the debt growth flattened out, decreases and then started to rise again.
    What hath Reagan, the Bush's, and yes, now Obama wrought? At least Obama doesn't “pretend” to be a conservative. Does anybody really think the tea party would be any different? Would Sarah Palin cut the federal funding to Alaska, which gets $1.82 in return for every federal tax dollar it pays?

    • StanW

      Do you actually think anyone here believes anything you say on ANY SUBJECT, Fiza? You have been caught lying anad making up things so often that you cannot be taken at your word on ANYTHING.

      • Fiza1

        Are you too stupid to comprehend the chart in the reference> Sorry, I guess I shouldn't have used such “big” words as “inflection point”.

        • StanW

          No, your problem is thinking you have any credibioity after your stupidity with gun safety!

          • Mr. EMT

            BURN!

    • Christopher_Taylor

      Congress handles the budget, so its up to whoever is in the legislative branch to handle cuts and raises in spending. So far the Democrats have by a GIGANTIC INSANELY MASSIVE margin shown they love raising spending more than the GOP, which was bad enough.

      • whats_up

        And yet Presidents can use their VETO power, and many so called Conservative Presidents have failed to do so, they are as guilty as the party that controlled Congress.

        • Christopher_Taylor

          We've only had one conservative president in the last 100+ years. Reagan should have vetoed more than he did, but he did veto some of the heinous budgets sent him. Bush was not a fiscal conservative. You guys on the left are relentlessly idiotic about this. GOP does not equal conservative. Get that through your numb skulls.

          • Mr. EMT

            Bush was more conservative than GOP gives him credit for being.
            Was he perfect? No.
            Did he cut taxes and spending? Yes. He didn't drown us with pork as obamao is doing.
            Stop playing their game with their rules CT.

          • Christopher_Taylor

            He was fiscally moderate at best; he was socially conservative.

        • Mr. EMT

          yeah Bush never used Veto right?

          http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/2

          here's 12 other bills:
          http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/t

          Here's another not in the list:
          http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22420862/

          Bush rejecting amnesty bill:
          http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-161799626.html

          That was 5 minutes research that debunked your absurd BS

      • Fiza1

        The President presents the budget to congress. President Bush presented the 2009 budget with “GIGANTIC INSANELY MASSIVE margin” to congress, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were only funded for six months.
        The last balance budget was Clinton's 2001 “GIGANTIC INSANELY MASSIVE” surplus, with surpluses projected as far as the eye could see. President Bush and his Republican congress sure blew that “GIGANTIC INSANELY MASSIVE” surplus.

        • mightysamurai

          The President presents the budget to congress.

          And Congress decides what parts of it to pass. The debt is theirs, Fiza. They have the responsibility to rein in overspending and they didn't do it.

          The last balance budget was Clinton's 2001 “GIGANTIC INSANELY MASSIVE” surplus, with surpluses projected as far as the eye could see.

          Exactly. The Clinton surplus was only projected. It didn't actually exist.

          • Mr. EMT

            kinda like the job growth obamao projected.

        • Christopher_Taylor

          Fiza, when you complain about President Bush's budgets it shows you are so totally out of touch with reality you aren't worth even discussing the matter with. Look up at that chart again. None of that was a Bush budget, the Democratic controlled congress didn't even pass the 2009 budget until President Obama was signed into office. Until you can stand up and say “the Bush budgets were bad, but Obamas are godawfuly worse” like we do,
          shut
          the
          hell
          up.

        • Mr. EMT

          What you and democrats call surplus. Working stiff's call debt.
          Money left over from a loan after paying a debt is still dept, not surplus as clinton and democrats love to call it.

          Also little fact the majority of Americans forget, and ignore is how many bills Bush had to veto due to pork.
          http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/2

          Loved it when pelosi was coming out saying “troops are dying because Bush is refusing to pass the bill.”

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C3IKAXMRVZNEU5BZKUD7LK6WBA Pete Moss

    John, and republicans, don't understand economics. The proof is that your party put this great country in this situation and now you have the nerve to think you know how to get us out.

    5 things blogger John should do:
    Get a real job
    Work with real people
    Travel
    educate yourself
    admit your parties many failures

    • StanW

      Perhaps you shoudl take your own advice, Pete!

      BTW, you never sent your tax returns to us. I wonder why?

      • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C3IKAXMRVZNEU5BZKUD7LK6WBA Pete Moss

        Because only an idiot would email his tax returns to strangers. I don't have to prove anything to you. Anything I've said about myself on this site is the truth…no reason to lie when life is this good. What you don't believe is that *anyone* with liberal opinions could succeed in life, because it doesn't fit your world view.

        Here's a better idea, write me at passion_follower@yahoo you know the rest when you're in the bay area, and I'll buy you a beer, or take you flying over this awesome region. If I take you flying you have to pay for lunch. :) Monterey is a nice flight…and the restaurant is pretty good.

        • StanW

          Ah, it was YOU that offered to send me your tax returns to prove what a success you are. If you had no intention of sending them, then why did you lie and offer to do it?

    • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

      John, and republicans, don't understand economics.

      And let me guess, Petey, you do understand economics, right?

      That's the best laugh I'm likely to have all day.

      Not more than 4-5 days ago you told us that unemployment benefits create jobs. Such a statement could only come from someone who really doesn't understand macro-economics. The level of economic ignorance behind that statement, especially from someone who regularly brags about his education, is, well let's just say jaw-dropping. Good thing you live in Madame Pelosi's district so that the two of you can figuratively blow each other to your heart's content.

      Your criticism of John and all Republicans sight unseen is just a little suspect because it appears that, based on your earlier statements, you wouldn't know sound economics if it crawled up your shorts and bit you in the *ss.

      • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C3IKAXMRVZNEU5BZKUD7LK6WBA Pete Moss

        No one said unemployment benefits create jobs. The benefits lubricate the economy, and an improving economy is the only thing that will lead to job creation.

        The rest of what you claim is just typical malarky.

        • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

          You must have been hella stoned last week 'cause here's the post (emphasis mine):

          Pete Moss 07/08/2010 11:07 AM
          It's true conservatives aren't too good at economics.

          The reason giving unemployment checks can create jobs is because unemployed people need to spend the money they get. Money flowing through the economy is what inspires people to start businesses and create jobs. This is a simple concept that even conservatives can understand. One of the problems we are having today is that the economy needs people buying stuff. This is your capitalist system, btw, which suffers under the delusion of perpetual growth and increased profits. My capitalist system is a social-capitalist system, where consumption is one factor, and not the ultimate measure, of economic success.

          (Edited by author 6 days ago)

          Or was it some evil conservative who hijacked your account and posted that in your stead?

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C3IKAXMRVZNEU5BZKUD7LK6WBA Pete Moss

    Love this from the Town Hall comments of John's sophomoric rant:

    Haha, this is why I subscribe to Townhall. What's threatening America now?

    1. Debt. We need to cut social programs that help Americans…(but keep funding the multi-trillion dollar military industrial complex to keep killing people that aren't Americans) Awesome.

    2. Be afraid America! We're no longer at threat level Mandarin Copper…it's been elevated to Sangria Sunrise!!! FEAR!!!

    3. Islam is the devil, America is always right, Jesus is Lord, and immigrants are going to ruin us (since everyone in the conservative movement is a Native American, I'm sure)

    4. Your tax money should be spent on carpet bombing Muslim civilians, not providing you with domestic services. You'll be happier when you're free from government financial reform or government healthcare. Free to be enslaved by the banks…free to die in the gutter. Enjoy that freedom, son.

    5. Abortion is murder (but killing people already born with drone raids is justified, of course), and homo's are the devil

    There's the five points Mr. Hawkins just made. I would argue he's #6, haha.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info