Bringing new meaning to sleazy


This advertising campaign is, well, bad. Very, very bad.

There is a certain irony, though, you know.

The defense representation being offered here is in fact completely legitimate — n0t only to sleazeballs, slime and creeps, who are constitutionally entitled to their defense (just not by me), but to people involved in all sorts of disputes (but typically divorces) who are wrongfully accused of being sleazeballs, slime and creeps.

But the choices made in these ads completely undermines that bona fide prospective, mainly because in the graphic, hyper-realistic and borderline pornographic pictures, the crimes being referred to are really happening.

Guess what, law firm? People who have been wrongfully accused of these acts, or who desperately want the world (including the justice system) to believe the accusation is wrong, want to be represented by the lawyers who only have innocent clients.

And from these ads, that does not seem to be you. Get it?

Turn in your wingtips. Please.

Cross posted on my pretty good blog, Likelihood of Success. I also have a heavy-hitting law blog called LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION:® but considering this post I’m kind of embarrassed about the whole concept. (It’ll pass.)

Trending on the Web

Related Articles

29

No, the SB 1070 Ruling is not a Victory for Arizona

Forgive my pessimism, but I fail to see how exactly anyone but illegal immigrants and liberals won in the Supreme

35

Kangaroo Court Grants Cash Reward to Militant Homosexuals for Alleged Name-Calling

Until recently, Canada was considered part of the free world. But then political correctness got completely out of control: The

21

Al Franken’s Bad Judicial Comedy

Vitriolic left-wing Senator Al Franken has bought into the conservative courts myth.:  This myth is popular only so far as