Bringing new meaning to sleazy


This advertising campaign is, well, bad. Very, very bad.

There is a certain irony, though, you know.

The defense representation being offered here is in fact completely legitimate — n0t only to sleazeballs, slime and creeps, who are constitutionally entitled to their defense (just not by me), but to people involved in all sorts of disputes (but typically divorces) who are wrongfully accused of being sleazeballs, slime and creeps.

But the choices made in these ads completely undermines that bona fide prospective, mainly because in the graphic, hyper-realistic and borderline pornographic pictures, the crimes being referred to are really happening.

Guess what, law firm? People who have been wrongfully accused of these acts, or who desperately want the world (including the justice system) to believe the accusation is wrong, want to be represented by the lawyers who only have innocent clients.

And from these ads, that does not seem to be you. Get it?

Turn in your wingtips. Please.

Cross posted on my pretty good blog, Likelihood of Success. I also have a heavy-hitting law blog called LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION:® but considering this post I’m kind of embarrassed about the whole concept. (It’ll pass.)

Related Articles

17

Obama STILL Refuses to Demand that Mexico Release Marine Sgt Andrew Tahmooressi

Supporters of Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi who was arrested by Mexican authorities because he had a gun in his car

4

Texas Patriots Facing The Left’s Smear Machine

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I am here all week in Texas in Houston’s 18th Congressional District observing

52

Obama’s SCOTUS Pick: A Military Hating Harriet Miers

Obama’s SCOTUS nominee, Elana Kagan, is like Harriet Miers in some respects. She’s a very accomplished woman, but she’s under-accomplished