Bringing new meaning to sleazy


This advertising campaign is, well, bad. Very, very bad.

There is a certain irony, though, you know.

The defense representation being offered here is in fact completely legitimate — n0t only to sleazeballs, slime and creeps, who are constitutionally entitled to their defense (just not by me), but to people involved in all sorts of disputes (but typically divorces) who are wrongfully accused of being sleazeballs, slime and creeps.

But the choices made in these ads completely undermines that bona fide prospective, mainly because in the graphic, hyper-realistic and borderline pornographic pictures, the crimes being referred to are really happening.

Guess what, law firm? People who have been wrongfully accused of these acts, or who desperately want the world (including the justice system) to believe the accusation is wrong, want to be represented by the lawyers who only have innocent clients.

And from these ads, that does not seem to be you. Get it?

Turn in your wingtips. Please.

Cross posted on my pretty good blog, Likelihood of Success. I also have a heavy-hitting law blog called LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION:® but considering this post I’m kind of embarrassed about the whole concept. (It’ll pass.)

Related Articles

4

White Supremacists At Stormfront React To The Sikh Temple Shooting

Back in the day, Right Wing News used to semi-regularly cover the loopiness that cranks, conspiracy theorists, and white supremacists

21

Justice Dept finally finds ‘real’ scandal; looking at Obama outhouse parade float

Since investigating multiple “fake” scandals like the White House Benghazi cover-up and IRS targeting of conservatives seem so petty, Holder’s

0

Breaking: Obama’s Safe Schools Czar’s Question to 14 Year Olds: “Spit vs. Swallow?… Is it Rude?” (audio-video)

Breaking extension to earlier post! Via Gateway Pundit! Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings founded the Gay, Lesbian, and