Bringing new meaning to sleazy

This advertising campaign is, well, bad. Very, very bad.

There is a certain irony, though, you know.

The defense representation being offered here is in fact completely legitimate — n0t only to sleazeballs, slime and creeps, who are constitutionally entitled to their defense (just not by me), but to people involved in all sorts of disputes (but typically divorces) who are wrongfully accused of being sleazeballs, slime and creeps.

But the choices made in these ads completely undermines that bona fide prospective, mainly because in the graphic, hyper-realistic and borderline pornographic pictures, the crimes being referred to are really happening.

Guess what, law firm? People who have been wrongfully accused of these acts, or who desperately want the world (including the justice system) to believe the accusation is wrong, want to be represented by the lawyers who only have innocent clients.

And from these ads, that does not seem to be you. Get it?

Turn in your wingtips. Please.

Cross posted on my pretty good blog, Likelihood of Success. I also have a heavy-hitting law blog called LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION:® but considering this post I’m kind of embarrassed about the whole concept. (It’ll pass.)

Related Articles

69

Obama wants public schools around the country to create memorials to Michael Brown

FacebookTwitterEmail Divide and distrust by Obama. Institutionalized and mandated racism as well as hero worship for a criminal simply because

2

Trial Lawyers Poised to Sue Society Into Stone Age

FacebookTwitterEmail Moonbats had hoped Copenhagen would mean economically crippling Western Civilization. Instead, they had to settle for stealing $billions upon

0

The George Zimmerman Case Is Not Over

FacebookTwitterEmail Don’t be breaking out the bubbly to celebrate George Zimmerman’s not guilty verdict, we’re just getting started. In my

Share This

Share this post with your friends!