DSK “Rape” Scandal: Everyone is a Whore, Case Closed

Cross-posted at UNCOVERAGE.net

My story yesterday about “following the buck” in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn rape case still stands….and now we have more clues about everyone’s motivation. The conclusion is: Just about everyone involved in this DSK scandal, from beginning to end, is an amoral piece of crap.

From the New York Post, which is the only media outlet conducting “real” shoe-leather journalism on this story, we learn the alleged Sofitel hotel maid/“rape” victim is actually a hooker and a scam artist:

“Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s accuser wasn’t just a girl working at a hotel — she was a working girl. The Sofitel housekeeper who claims the former IMF boss sexually assaulted her in his room was doing double duty as a prostitute, collecting cash on the side from male guests, The Post has learned.

There is information . . . of her getting extraordinary tips, if you know what I mean. And it’s not for bringing extra f–king towels,” a source close to the defense investigation said yesterday.

The woman was allegedly purposely assigned to the Midtown hotel by her union because it knew she would bring in big bucks.

“When you’re a chambermaid at Local 6, when you first get to the US, you start at the motels at JFK [Airport]. You don’t start at the Sofitel,” the source said. “There’s a whole squad of people who saw her as an earner.”

The woman also had “a lot of her expenses — hair braiding, salon expenses — paid for by men not related to her,” the source said.

Allegations that she worked as a hotel hooker may explain why Strauss-Kahn insists their encounter was consensual. His defense attorneys refused yesterday to comment on the damning evidence — or say whether he paid her for sex.

Sources also told The Post Strauss-Kahn’s probers uncovered evidence that she was part of a pyramid scheme that targeted immigrants from her native Guinea.

“We have people who have been victimized, who have claimed she ripped them off. Nice working people from her neighborhood,” a source said.”

The fact that the rape “victim” is probably not a victim, does not make DSK a “victim.”

As Andrea Peyser writes, “This filthy froggy is still a warthog:”

“This is a man who enjoyed a glamorous doormat wife, a stellar career, and was fawned over by France’s legion of lefties.

And DSK repaid the admiration by checking into New York’s posh Sofitel, and promptly bedding a much-younger immigrant maid.

Rather, the acts in which he engaged took place standing up, and fully clothed.

As soon as he was done getting oral sex, Strauss-Kahn checked out of the hotel as fast as a scared bunny. Then he had lunch with his 26-year-old daughter, as if nothing special had happened.

To men like Strauss-Kahn, it was another day at the beach.”

What of Mrs. DSK? What does Anne Sinclair, whose real name is Schwartz, who lives fabulously off the inherited wealth of her artist grandfather, get out of a marriage to an arrogant whore-dog? Shame on Anne, she is of the leftist line of feminist “wives” who seek political power, ala Hillary Clinton. But at least Hillary ignores Bill’s bed-bouncing. Anne Sinclair BRAGS about DSK:

“There is no doubt that Ms. Sinclair was aware of her husband’s skirt-chasing, but in public, at least, seemed not to care. Asked in 2006 by L’Express if she suffered from his reputation as a womanizer, she said: “No! I’m even proud of it. It’s important to seduce, for a politician. As long as he is still attracted to me, and I to him, it is sufficient.”

Noone is asking the dutiful Anne with blow-job-blinders about the fact that the maid/hooker lives in special New York subsidized housing for HIV-positive people. So is the devoted wifey willing to die for her husband’s political “advancements?” Pathetic!

[read the rest of the “romance” of this shameful couple who do Jews a disservice.]

So we need have no sympathy for the rape “victim,” nor for DSK or his appeasing wife.

Also suffering what we hope is irreversible career damage from this debacle is District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., who has a disgracefully long laundry list of losing prosecutions, many of them involving rape. Rape really does occur, and what confidence do New Yorkers have that such a horrible crime can be competently prosecuted and punished? Also, DSK has millions available for his defense team. What becomes of the accused in New York City who CAN’T afford a Benjamin Brafman to do the work the police, district attorney and grand jury should have done?

Finally, where does all this leave Mr. Defense attorney with his “bruised vagina” alibi?? Isn’t that just normal “wear and tear” for a hotel hooker?

PHOTOS: DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHN

FRENCH ARE READY TO FIGHT

FILTHY FROGGY STILL A WART HOG

‘NO WAY SHE SURVIVES A CROSS EXAMINATION’

ANOTHER DEBACLE FOR BLACK-EYE CY

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!