For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
How Liberal Regulations Destroy People’s Live: The Coal Example
Written By : John Hawkins

When liberals get into power, they ceaselessly churn out reams of job killing red tape with no concern whatsoever about how it impacts people in the real world. But, the fact of the matter is that real people’s lives are damaged by these thoughtless regulations that are put in place by these liberal politicians. Just take a look at what the Left is doing to coal miners in West Virginia:

Michael Fox can literally see where his job ends.

The 14-year veteran of the West Virginia coal mining industry is about a year and a half out from finishing his current project, and he can see the boundaries of the site. He doesn’t know whether there will be any work left for him after that, since a wave of environmental regulation has put his firm’s other permits on hold.

“Unless we can get a permit, we can’t extend the job no farther,” he said. “Right now, I don’t know if I can make it or not.”

Fox, who is married and has three kids, is among the hundreds of Appalachian miners who plan to rally in Washington, D.C., Wednesday in a bid to pressure the Obama administration to loosen restrictions on coal mining in their states. They say the rules amount to a de facto freeze on a chunk of the industry, jeopardizing jobs in one of the most economically depressed parts of the country.

Since last year, The Environmental Protection Agency has stepped up regulation on mountaintop coal mining across six Appalachian states because the explosives that are used to remove mountain surfaces send debris into rivers and streams, endangering the environment.

But with the stricter rules in place, the industry, which is considered the lifeblood of Appalachian towns, argues it’s under attack. Workers and advocacy groups that represent them say the rules unfairly target their region and require mining firms to meet unrealistic standards.

…In a state like West Virginia, whose $37,500 median household income is well below the national average, coal mining is considered a dangerous-but-reliable career.

Fox, who lives in Gilbert, estimates that he pulls in about $70,000 a year as a heavy equipment operator. He owns a small apartment complex on the side that he rents out to visiting trail riders; he intended that to be a nest egg for his kids’ education. But without the mining job, he worries he won’t be able to afford to maintain that side business and, in turn, won’t be able to send his kids to college.

According to a study put out in May by Republicans on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, EPA regulations put one in every four coal jobs in the region at risk. The study estimated that nearly 18,000 jobs, and about 80 small businesses, were tied to the 190 permits under enhanced review at the time.

Kentucky Coal Association President Bill Bissett said that 30 of those permits have since been withdrawn over EPA environmental concerns. Claiming thousands of other permits could be retroactively affected, Bissett called the regulations a “two-fold attack” on the industry. He said the new framework has put mining firms’ investment on hold, as well as that of outside investors.

“Everything’s in limbo,” he said.

…(Bryan Brown, executive director of the Federation for American Coal) said the standard the EPA uses is “ludicrous” and almost impossible to meet.

“Perrier drinking water doesn’t meet that standard,” he said. “They’ve implemented it knowing that the industry can’t meet it.”

This is liberalism at its core: a bunch of know-it-all lefties putting people out of work, all across the country, and then patting themselves on the back because they “care.” If you point out all the lives that they’re damaging with their regulations, they mumble something about how awful Republicans are or demonize corporations. Maybe, they’ll even pat themselves on the back because they’re big supporters of welfare programs for the people they put out of work.

This isn’t good and it isn’t noble. It’s snide, arrogant elitism that says that liberals should keep people from working for a living for “their own good.” You see, they don’t know their interests as well as the Left. If these miners understood the world like liberals do, why then they’d see that they’re better off being unemployed! What liberal rot…

0
  • Lee

    Liberalism: stupid is as stupid does.

    Are you required to get a labotomy to be a certified, card-carrying liberal? Or just show you could care less about anyone but yourself?

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Why doesn't he get one of those millions of green jobs the democrats have created?

    They exist, you just have to move to China and learn Mandarin.

  • Kingfisher

    Once they lose their jobs they'll be forced to go on government assistance.

    The Democratic party: creating slaves since 1928.

    • Mahatma

      <i?once assistance.<=”" be=”" forced=”" go=”" government=”" i=”" jobs=”" lose=”" on=”" their=”" they=”" they'll=”" to=”">

      Which is why Blankenships approach is much better. Dead miners don't collect government assistance.

      The Republican Party: making cadavers since the Great Depression.
      </i?once>

      • Kingfisher

        LAME!

        Why don't you take some additional time to think of a better comeback?

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/G5UUF6SFVDPQQQF4AEF3KR4PKM Simon

    OT:

    Re: your drug war column. Who is more likely to sell intoxicants to children? A liquor store or a criminal on the street? You know what Prosecutors who favor pot legalization in Calif. are saying? It will reduce access of illegal drugs to kids. Illegal drugs are easier for kids to get than beer. You can look it up.

    And the best reason to end the drug war?

    DRUG WAR = BIG GOVERNMENT

    ====

    Which is also in part my answer to Lee above. Conservatives are not so smart either. Which is why I'm a libertarian Republican.

  • Mahatma

    I agree. I think that Blankenship fellow down West Virginia knew how to maximize profits for Massey Coal. It is MUCH better for profits to pay the measly fines imposed for safety violations and pay off spouses of miners killed due to lack of said safety measures.

    Whats a few lives compared to the massive profits he makes? It is a much less troublesome way to put people out of work.

  • Guess

    Regulation of the Coal Industry was caused by hazardous work conditions and desecration of the environment because the companies valued profit over life. They EARNED these regulations.

  • Mahatma

    Once they lose their jobs they'll be forced to go on government assistance.

    Which is why Blankenship's approach is much better. Dead miners don't collect government assistance.

    The Republican Party: making cadavers since the Great Depression.

  • Huron Voyager

    If you mine coal, you're not worthy of life. The miners should just be thankful they aren't getting thrown in jail for the damage that they have caused.

  • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

    Wow could you be anymore of an ass? First gratuitous sexism, and now outright hatred of people doing jobs you THINK are basically criminal, when they are perfectly legal.

    Kindly take your hatred and bigotry elsewhere troll, you're bile is not fit for polite society.

  • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

    And your sure Blankenships approach kills miners, how?

  • jimb

    Ok, then you start by turning off your computer. Coal generates 57% of the electricty in the US.

    http://www.powerscorecard.org/tech_detail.cfm?resource_id=2

    Unless you've got something to replace it with then ST*U.

  • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

    Some of them not all, especially these new ones that are impossible to meet and do nothing but destroy jobs and make it impossible to keep electricity flowing.

  • Huron Voyager

    Nuclear.

  • Huron Voyager

    Perfectly legal…for now.

  • Jimb

    Like that will fly with the environmental lobby.

    I agree nuclear is a possibility. However, the estimated time to build a new nuke plant is 20-30 years. As this article is talking about the next 1½ years what do you propose we do NOW?

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/OZBTYQK5MN5SKP6FA6KK4TJOQ4 MichaelAlan

      Really, it took the Iranians 20-30 years to build their nuclear plant? More like 2-3 years.

      • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

        You have heard of NRC and EPA right, any Nuke plant in the US proposed today will not go online for 20-30yrs on average in the current regulatory environment the last 3-5 being actual construction.

        Meanwhile countries like France and China drop new ones every few years because of their different regulations.

      • UFKA_Smithwick

        The physical effort of building one takes far less than 20 years.

        The bureaucratic red tape that every single one in this country must go through takes far longer.

        The last plant we built was started in 1977.

        • Toastrider

          bthewolf and UFKA hit it on the head. The problem isn't physical construction. The problem is there is a considerable lobby against building such power plants, particularly in the regulatory agencies.

          Which is sad, because to make our way to electrically-driven vehicles, we have got to have better power generation. Otherwise we're going to blow the fusebox of the entire U.S.

  • Jimb

    Additionally – what would you do with nuke waste?

    We can always put it down the street from you in Canada…

  • Huron Voyager

    Always count on gfchicago to show up and show off her whoring skills.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Correct.

    Now get your friends on the left to stop trying to kill the industry outright.

  • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

    Always count on H_stupidity to classless, sexist dick.

  • UFKA_Smithwick

    Don't worry, in a few more years we will have lost all our manufacturing jobs to the Chinese due to overly strong unions and oppressive regulations.

    We'll be living in mud huts but hey, at least we won't be generating much of that evil electricity.

  • TheDickNixon

    Maybe you can enthrall us with the “Thrilling Adventures of Huron Serenity and the “Canadian Soldier”.

  • Proud Infidel

    “Liberals aren't evil, they just know so much tat isn't so.” – Ronald Reagan

Advertisement
Featured Video

Ed Klein on ‘The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House’

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info