For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Uber Scary Tim Tebow ‘Pro-Life’ Super Bowl Ad and Feminist Lunacy
Written By : Lori Ziganto

Yes, I do realize that “feminist lunacy” is sort of redundant. As for the ad itself, you might want to remove any children (who you’ve been “punished” by) from the room before watching this uber scary video. This is the pre-game ad from Pam and Tim Tebow and Focus on the Family that caused such consternation from Feminists. The second ad was allegedly more “controversial” and didn’t air until game time. In that one, from all the feminist shrieking, including lawsuit threats by Gloria Allred, I thought that Mrs. Tebow may have actually mentioned that she chose(not the Newspeak feminist version of chose) not to have an abortion. Oh, the horror!

This is truly terrifying stuff! This ad is part of what had all those feminists up in arms. Behold! (If you can bear watching it without shielding your eyes in horror! A Mom, loves her son. And is proud of him. Egads!)

I know Tim Tebow also loves his Mommy and is awfully proud of her. And so am I.

When the second Tebow ad ran, the one that was allegedly “controversial”, I just saw more of the same. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seemed to be almost the same as the first ad and didn’t even mention Pam Tebow’s decision to continue her pregnancy and not abort. It was just more love between a Mom and son. Shocking! Here it is, so you can judge for yourselves:

And that is what had Feminists’ panties (sorry for that visual) in a bunch. Of course, they had nothing to say about the Go Daddy ads, as Ed Morrissey notes. Lunacy.

National Organization for Women (NOW) President, Terry O’Neill went so far as to say the following about the Tebow ad, in response to Sarah Palin’s defense of the same:

In a statement to POLITICO, NOW President Terry O’Neill said that Palin is “missing our point.”

“The goal of the Focus on the Family ad is not to empower women. It’s to create a climate in which Roe v. Wade can be overturned,” O’Neill said. “There are always going to be women who need abortions. In this country, one in three women will have an abortion.”

Wow. An ad showing the love between a Mom and a son creates a “climate” to overturn Roe v. Wade? If Roe v. Wade is on such shaky ground, doesn’t that sort of take the wind out of the sails of the validity of your pro-abortion arguments, Miss O’Neill? And that is what they are: pro-abortion arguments. You see, self-proclaimed feminists are actually pro-abortion and anti-choice. We’ve seen that time and time again and it was only further evidenced by the insanity displayed over the mere hint of an ad focusing on a woman who chose not to abort. If you were truly pro-choice, you’d embrace examples of women who chose to continue with high-risk pregnancies, creating — and saving — LIFE.

Your first concern is automatically Roe v. Wade. Why? Is motherhood that icky to you? You are more concerned with one Supreme Court case, that you constantly use as a wedge and a pawn, than you are with actual women. You should be happy when women, and motherhood, are honored.  You should be thrilled when the love that comes with motherhood is held up as something wonderful. Instead, you worry only about your own political agendas.

While you claim that Focus on the Family isn’t trying to “empower women”, your political agenda does not empower women in any way. In fact, it does the opposite. You’ve turned women into helpless victims, who cannot do anything without Big Daddy Government protecting them, nor make any decisions on their own. It is insulting that you think that you know what is best for women. We can, and do, think for ourselves, you know. You’d rather we all were little Stepford Feminists, blindly following your destructive lead. Well, we don’t. Your lead diminishes us.

Your comment about how one in three women will have an abortion does not make your argument for you either. To the contrary; it is a horrifying, heart breaking statistic for which humanity will one day harshly judge us.

As a woman who abhors the modern day Faux-Feminists, I thank you, Pam and Tim Tebow. For sharing your story, for being brave and for reminding people of what is really important.

Love. And Life.

(Cross-posted at David Horowitz’s NewsReal and Snarkandboobs)

0
  • Crimsonfella

    Great post! I don’t think I could say it any better than you did.

  • RKae

    Something’s not adding up here.

    1.) One in every three women will have an abortion. (Really?)
    2.) People in the past were not enlightened, because abortion used to be illegal and unsafe.
    3.) We’re more enlightened these days because condoms are now readily available to all, and advertized on TV!
    4.) You can’t stop teens from having sex with education! They’ve always had sex and always will!

    So how did it work in the past? No safe/legal abortion; no readily available condoms; no proper education; teens always having the same amount of sex. Why, they must have been cranking out babies by the truckload! Each girl must have had four children by the age of 18!

    I mean, where was that one-third of the female population that needed the abortions back in past? Or could it be that they were just more responsible back then?

    Why was it that in my entire high school (class of 1981) ONE girl got pregnant and dropped out… but today (in a world of easier abortion and birth control) there’s a daycare center in the school? And, that daycare, of course, is just for LIVE children. It’s impossible to know how many abortions have been had by the girls at the school.

  • Pingback: Weekend Round-Up of Self-Pimpage « Snark And Boobs

  • RtWingNtCase

    I agree, RKae.

    Where the hell did they come up with that outrageous abortion “statistic”?

  • Robert_Ingersoll

    Focus on the Family got exactly what they wanted, they released just enough information to get the press, got people watching, then pulled back on the ad to play the victim.

  • StanInTexas

    then pulled back on the ad to play the victim.
    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll 2010-02-08 07:04:16

    And what proof do you have that they “pulled back the ad”, Robert?

    And as far as “playing the victim”, that is just an extra helping of STUPID on your part. The so-called pro-choice side of the argument wanted the ad pulled without ever seeing it and whined the entire time. They tried to play the victim, and in the end, just got played.

    The ad did one thing brilliantly, it exposed the pro-abortion position for what it is, a fraud and a death cult.

  • http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

    And what proof do you have that they “pulled back the ad”, Robert?

    Robert_Ingertroll “forgot” to mention that he’s receiving all of his information from NOW so the truth will obviously suffer as a result.

    This was their plan all along…keep the message simple and positive. NOW actually provided more publicity to F on the F’s advantage.

    The vast majority of the American people loved the ad, they saw nothing controversial about it.

    To summarize:

    Focus on the Family: 7
    NOW: 0

  • StanInTexas

    The vast majority of the American people loved the ad, they saw nothing controversial about it.

    Posted by Kingfisher 2010-02-08 09:54:28

    What the American people saw was the desparation of the Left on the issue of abortion, and the fear from the National Organization of Liberal Women as they slip quickly into irrelevance.

    “We oppose Sexual harassment in the workplace…” unless it is a Democrat we like doing it.
    “We think woman ought to have a choice…” unless they CHOOSE to have a baby, or CHOOSE to be a stay-at-home-mother, or CHOOSE to be a cheerleader, etc.
    “We are women, hear us roar…” unless we don’t get our way, at which point we will pout and cry and get our feelings hurt.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by StanInTexas
    2010-02-08 10:00:07

    Don’t forget:

    We oppose the oppression of women and freeing them from it unless they are in Islamic nations.

  • Smithwick

    So publicly acknowledging that you choose not to have an abortion makes the argument that abortions should be banned? So by that logic has everyone who has chosen not to buy a gun working to actively overthrow the 2nd amendment? What about people who choose not to vote?

    Feminist are all about choice in the same way all cults respect choice; you can choose to tow the party line or you can choose to be an outcast who is to be attacked and demonized at every opportunity (her children are also fair game, if she has made the despicable choice to reproduce).

    It is unfortunate that this is what feminism has come to, considering their once noble goal and the continued plight of many women around the world. There are honor killings, female circumcision, rape as a form of legal punishment, forced marriages, and females are preferentially aborted in many countries just to name a few legitimate womens issues they could be focusing on.

  • Bill_Dalasio

    Is it me, or is it a little strange to hear all the feminists who beat their breasts incessantly about how “fierce” they are wilting like lillies about what amounts to a cute commmercial?

  • MediumHeadBoy

    … all the feminists who beat their breasts …

    More violence against womyn!!11111!1111111!!!1!1!11!

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    …Is it me, or is it a little strange to hear all the feminists who beat their breasts incessantly…

    Mr. Dalasio, you must know a different class of femynysts than I because the ones I know haven’t got any breasts to beat.

    rimshot…/rimshot

  • Pingback: World Spinner

  • Pingback: The Biggest Obstacle To Achieving Your Lifes Goals May Just Be You | Self Help, Improvement, Motivation, Inspiration, Advice And Tips

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info