For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
“Why, Oh Why, Do Conservatives Hate America So?”
Written By : McQ

The title is a quote from Eugene Robinson’s latest effort in which he indulges himself in another leftist “history began January, 20th, 2009″ moment. His ire and the reason for his rhetorical question comes on the heels of the announcement that Barack Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace prize and the derision by which that was met on the right.

Robinson then spends the rest of his article taking pot shots at those who find the award to be a travesty. But in the entire 700 to 800 word spread, he never once even attempts to justify the award. The best he can do is this:

Obama has shifted U.S. foreign policy away from George W. Bush’s cowboy ethos toward a multilateral approach. He envisions, and has begun to implement, a different kind of U.S. leadership that I believe is more likely to succeed in an interconnected, multipolar world. That this shift is being noticed and recognized is to Obama’s credit — and to our country’s.

Of course, as any student of foreign affairs will tell you, that all remains to be seen. But again, one has to pretend that there was no multilateralism in existence prior to Obama to make this sort of a claim. And, of course, that’s simply not the case. So if Robinson’s reason for the prize is to be taken seriously, then the detractors are correct – it’s a travesty.

In the short term at least, it has become what most thinking people realized when it was awarded to Jimmy Carter – the “You’re Not George Bush” award. In reality, the Nobel Peace prize has degenerated into a political award given to those who best reflect the politics of the decidedly leftist award committee. It has little to do with peace. It has nothing to do with objectivity. It has everything to do with partisan leftist politics.

There are certainly many more worthy candidates who’ve worked very hard to bring peace to troubled areas. But they simply don’t provide the committee with the political visibility it craves. And they certainly don’t provide the committee the platform from which to make some sort of statement about what it finds acceptable in US politics and, frankly, what it doesn’t.

Anyone who brings as weak an argument to the table as has Eugene Robinson must in the back of his mind realize how undeserving Obama is of this award. To say he’s really accomplished nothing of substance in his first 9 months as president is an understatement. But it is also a fact.

One of the reasons the Medal of Honor is so difficult to earn is because the standards of courage, sacrifice and bravery required are set at an almost unachievable level. And those standards are never compromised for politics or any other reason. That’s why when you see a man wearing the MOH, you know without having to wonder that he met those standards. And when he meets another MOH recipient, there’s no doubt in his mind that recipient also met the very same high standards of courage under fire that he did.

That’s why the MOH is revered so highly.

The Nobel Peace Prize has, as critics are now claiming, has become a travesty driven by partisan politics. It isn’t “highly revered” anymore. The fact that Robinson wants to keep up the charade that this “honor” is something worth having (much less deserved) because it is politically useful for his side to do so speaks volumes about his integrity. He claims the right thing to say is “congratulations”. But I have little doubt that had the committee awarded George Bush the peace prize for ousting Saddam, defeating al-Qaeda in Iraq, and returning the country to the people, Robinson would have been among the first on the “travesty” bandwagon. The last thing he’d have said is “congratulations”. He’d also have been among the first to wonder why he was being accused of “hating America so”.

Those who remember the period before January, 20th 2009, remember when the Eugene Robinson’s of the world thought dissent was the highest form of patriotism. Now, with history beginning on that date for those like Robinson, dissent is just plain old hate.

Funny how that works, isn’t it?

[Crossposted at QandO]

0
  • Ralph_Gizzip

    Those who remember the period before January, 20th 2009, remember when the Eugene Robinson’s of the world thought dissent was the highest form of patriotism. Now, with history beginning on that date for those like Robinson, dissent is just plain old hate.

    Funny how that works, isn’t it?

    Yes, it's all different when it's your ox being gored.

  • SomeOtherSteve

    No surprise here. Reagan never received credit from the left for ending the Cold War by showing the Soviet Union that not only was he calling their bluff, he was raising the pot. Reagan knew that capitalism was his best weapon against tyranny. Maybe the fall of the Soviet Union didn't happen while he was in office, but I'm sure when he got news of the collapse, he was smiling and thinking, "Vindication."

  • Mike_M

    Well Obama sure has had success in punishing Honduras for upholding its Constitution. He sat idly by while democratic protesters in Iran were shot, arrested, and tortured. He sold out Eastern Europe and insulted Britain. He's taken great pains to cozy up to Putin, Ahmadenijad, Castro, and Chavez.

    See, the problem with going from a unipolar to a multipolar world means the unipolar power has to be taken down to the level of the others. Obama certainly is doing his best to weaken America while anti-America liberals like Robinson bark and clap like trained seals.

  • abcxyz

    No one gets Nobel prize for attempted Chemistry or attempted Medicine so it should be for Peace. I can understand the economics prize going to idiots and bums who don't do much to improve the society, it is given by a bank, but not the Peace prize. But alas, it completely shed its veil of seriousness with Obama winning.

  • Jack Schite

    Oh quit comparing the protests against Bush's illegal and immoral policies with the ignorant and racist Obama protesters. Apples and oranges, as everyone but the losing and unamerican party of ignorance (that's you guys) seems to understand.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    The title is a quote from Eugene Robinson’s latest effort in which he indulges himself in another leftist “history began January, 20th, 2009? moment.

    Thank GOD you pointed that out. Otherwise D-Vega would be in here bitching and moaning about all the "lies" you're telling.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Shut up, Jack. Nobody cares what you think.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    There you are again, Mr. Schite, referring back to a president who's been out of office for nearly a year. What is it with you – can't get with the times? Maybe if you pulled your head out of your butt long enough to realise that times have changed and we're running under a different regime, it might help you overcome that bad case of Bush fixation.

  • tblrk2006

    Oh quit comparing the protests against Bush's illegal and immoral policies

    Posted by Jack Schite

    2009-10-14 09:25:32

    Ok, now is your chance to NAME the illegal policy and what made it illegal.

  • Mike_M

    "Ok, now is your chance to NAME the illegal policy and what made it illegal."

    Well the Medicare Prescription entitlement and No Child Left Behind were certainly not in the realm of Constitutional Federal government responsibilities, and creating dependency of the government and Federal interference in education could be called immoral.

    President Obama should do the right thing and ask Congress to repeal these questionable Bush policies immediately. They should also correct another shabby Republican trick and make the 2003 tax cuts permanent rather than allow the government to suck more money out of the economy during a recession.

  • belacuse

    Posted by Jack Schite

    2009-10-14 09:25:32

    I would suggest a drinking game where we all take a shot every time Jack posts an inane comment devoid of any basis in reality – but I fear my liver couldn't take it.

  • D-Vega

    Thank GOD you pointed that out. Otherwise D-Vega would be in here bitching and moaning about all the "lies" you're telling.

    The difference is that the headline is an actual quote from the article.

    That's called being the difference between honesty and truth.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    The difference is

    …That you don't have a horrible, aching man-crush on McQ.

  • D-Vega

    Back to the playbook, huh?

  • TheBaud

    Back to the playbook, huh?

    Posted by D-Vega 2009-10-14 11:15:46

    Back to your arrogance and lies, huh?

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I can't decide if these guys are so stupid they don't know about what the left did (and still does) for the last 8 years, or if they think we are so stupid we've forgotten. Maybe its just religious zealotry: a horror and shock that anyone could possibly disagree with what President Obama is and wants to do.

  • D-Vega

    We know the feeling very well, CT. Turn-about is a bitch.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I figure zealotry is probably the most probable answer. They cannot stand the possibility that their hero, their messiah, their lord and King be questioned. The very idea is so shocking they don't even bother thinking back to the hundreds of thousands of examples of hateful, shrill, insane attacks on President Bush by themselves and their cronies.

    Sort of like a girl who is a total bitch to everyone then screams when someone says something mean to her because nothing like that has ever happened before in the history of mankind.

    And the left thinks nobody remembers? Think again. All it does is make them look weak, whiny, and manipulative, none of which is attractive to anyone.

  • D-Vega

    I remember, CT. I remember the same things being said about Obama were said about Clinton. And then said about Bush II.

    The difference is Obama has only been in office for 9 months.

  • LampofDiogenes

    The difference is Obama has only been in office for 9 months.

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-14 15:16:04

    Didn't take us long to figure out what an empty suit he is, did it?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    I remember the same things being said about Obama were said about Clinton.

    Really? The right accused Clinton of spending us into a depression and driving unemployment through the roof? The right accused Clinton of breaking his campaign promises at every turn? The right accused Clinton of subverting the democratic process of a sovereign nation to suck up to socialist dictators? The right accused Clinton of employing eugenicists, racists, and conspiracy theorists in his cabinet?

    Really, D-Vega?

    The difference is Obama has only been in office for 9 months.

    I know. I don't think I've ever seen someone fail so badly so quickly.

    I mean, 9.8% unemployment as of last month? That's almost DOUBLE the unemployment rate since Obama took office. How does Obama do these things?

  • TheBaud

    The difference is Obama has only been in office for 9 months.

    Posted by D-Vega 2009-10-14 15:16:04

    And this is yet another reason why you are such a complete and abject tool.

    Are you really going to tell us that the Left waited more than nine months to start slamming George W. Bush? That there was not an immediate "Selected, Not Elected" and "Stolen Office" screech from the Left?

    Are you truly THAT stupid?

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    That's the thing. The complaint about President Obama isn't "what a scumbag unworthy of office" they are "good lord he's spending us into a multi trillion dollar deficit while trying to take over huge sections of the US economy for flat out socialism and doesn't even seem to know what to do in his job."

    There's good reason people are upset with President Obama. This isn't racism or knee jerk opposition to a Democrat, good lord how deaf and ignorant can someone possibly be? There's simply no excuse for not knowing what the grievances are, especially someone coming to this website every day.

    I guess its just easier to project your own version of reality on current events. God knows the left did it in Iraq constantly.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by EyeBEW77

    2009-10-14 23:00:41

    Shut up hoggo, you're an idiot!

  • aharris

    Because he represents the voice of the mature minded voters who took them to the woodshed and spanked their little behinds in the last election.

    Which ones? You mean the ones in Detroit waiting for their Obamamoney?

    *snort*

Advertisement
Featured Video

Debbie Spend-it-now is selling America’s future to the Chinese

php developer india
Previous Features

Ads

Five Ways Conservatives Will Have to Sell Their Souls if Romney Wins
An Interview With Ron Paul
The RWN Real-Estate Sale
RWN\'s Favorite Tony Robbins Quotes
Stop Apologizing for Being an American
The Amway Experience
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info