For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
NPR’s Vivian Schiller Part of Liberal Bid to Nationalize Media
Written By : Dave Blount

Vivian Schiller, the obnoxious Stalinist CEO of taxpayer-funded NPR who not only fired Juan Williams but felt the need to denounce him as psychiatrically unfit for committing a trivial thought crime, is among the statist apparatchiks pushing for a federal takeover of the news media:

Schiller, a former New York Times executive, is one of a few dozen power players working with the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and a leftist group called Free Press to “reinvent journalism.” That’s how the FTC describes it. The FCC calls what they are doing the “Future of Journalism.” Free Press, a think tank funded by leftist billionaire George Soros, among others, calls it “the new public media.”

It’s all the same thing, a plan to take over local news coverage from for-profit television, radio and print media, which Schiller and her friends claim is in danger of extinction. These “friends” get together regularly with the heads of the FCC and FTC to brainstorm the details in government and congressional meetings. These meetings include the leaders of all the country’s public broadcasting outlets, including PBS, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and American Public Media.

They are beefing up their staffs in local news markets with herds of public news reporters to “take over” coverage as commercial media fails. Nationwide, this will cost $40 billion to $60 billion over a decade, they believe. Their plans, according to the FCC’s Future of Media report, are to raise this money by taxing for-profit news organizations — the ones whose reporting Schiller is supposedly trying to “save.” They want to charge “spectrum fees” of five percent of broadcast station revenues for use of the public spectrum and airwaves, which the government controls. They figure that could bring in $1.8 billion a year. A one percent tax on all electronic devices like cell phones, televisions and laptops could bring in billions more. So would a monthly fee on internet subscriptions.

While conservatives were busy arguing that NPR should be defunded in the wake of the Williams debacle, Schiller was putting the finishing touches on the national infrastructure NPR has launched to deliver this new government news product to cities across the nation. A decade ago, defunding NPR would have sufficed. To stop Schiller now, Republicans would have to defund PBS and CPB as well to have any hope of torpedoing her plans to build a nationwide news delivery system in the style of the BBC, but on steroids. Schiller imagines a national public print, television and radio news leviathan that would compete with the top five news companies in the news industry.

As with the “government option” in healthcare, competing with the private sector while strangling it with regulations and leaching it dry with taxes is only a step toward the ultimate objective of all liberal initiatives: Stalin-style totalitarian collectivism.

This fits in smoothly not only with the liberal ideology so rigidly espoused on NPR, but with its business model. Air America proved that left-wing bilge cannot compete in the free market, because most Americans are too healthy to have a use for it when they have alternatives. Therefore, it must be funded coercively.

To anyone who doesn’t want to get with the program, let Juan Williams be an example of where even the slightest deviation from leftist orthodoxy gets you.

vivian-schiller.jpg
Can you imagine NPR on every channel? Vivian Schiller can.

On a tip from J. Hat tip: Gateway Pundit. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

0
  • Martha

    A reasonable way to combat the control which the wealthy now have in directing our news.

    • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

      What? So the wealthy elites in government can control it instead? And this coming under an administration, the leader of which as recently as a couple of days ago labeled his opponents as “enemies”. I’m sure that government is fully competent and capable of deciding which local news stories I should hear and which I shouldn’t.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      The Politburo is waiting for your application as chief newspeak correspondent.

    • StanW

      And who shoudl have controll, spammer? YOU????

  • Waterwillows

    That Sorors and his group of creepy crawlers are always out to CONTROL every aspect of a person’s life. A very unhealthy obsession.
    It should have been apparent to all but the slimey that people are not interested in a ‘standard’ broadcast of anything. Variety is a better way.
    BTW just what is so fearful of a independant voice? Independance is the creative backbone of society. Look at Islam, where there is no independance you got dumb, and dumber.
    Mayybe the people should insist that all the nit-wits of Sorors have to wear lime green clothers for the next five years. Not another colour. Would they be able to fiqure it out? I wonder.

  • Anonymous

    Just remember: no corporation can point a gun at your head and force you to consume their product.

    The government can.

    And increasingly, they are.

    • Anonymous

      But they always do it for your own good.

      ; )

      • Proud Infidel

        Liberals ALWAYS know what’s best for us even more than we do, just ask one!!

  • D-Vega

    Anyone who bothered to actually read the report would know this is not nationalizing the media.

    It would be a hub of information accessible by all. A Lexis Nexus for everyone.

    And I couldn’t find anywhere, including the report:

    “”Their plans, according to the FCC’s Future of Media report, are to raise this money by taxing for-profit news organizations — the ones whose reporting Schiller is supposedly trying to “save.” They want to charge “spectrum fees” of five percent of broadcast station revenues for use of the public spectrum and airwaves, which the government controls. They figure that could bring in $1.8 billion a year. A one percent tax on all electronic devices like cell phones, televisions and laptops could bring in billions more. So would a monthly fee on internet subscriptions.”"‘

    Where is this in the report? Why wasn’t this linked to anywhere?

    • http://conservativebootcamp.com Martin Hale

      http://www.freepress.net/files/New_Public_Media.doc.pdf

      Start reading on page 19 for the funding source proposals.

      BTW, it took me a total of 3 minutes (yes, I timed it) to a)find the report (it was linked at the original article at Townhall, and b)to find the section in the report on funding proposals. In the time it took you to compose and post your whinge about it, you too could have found it. There were a total of four links in the original piece to follow. Four. I think you gave up without trying, my friend.

      It’s interesting to me that all of this talk, and all of the comments about fiscally strapped media emanating from this Free Press group are quite germane to the MSM and other left-leaning media, but they don’t apply at all to Fox News and the big right-wing talk radio shows which are all smashing commercial successes. All of them. Gee, I wonder why this Free Press group didn’t report that? Could it be that they’re biased?

      Maybe, just maybe, there’s a message in there for the astute broadcaster or newspaper publisher who’s willing to revert to the balance between right and left that we enjoyed in earlier times. Newspapers, national newsrooms, weekly newsmagazines have all been the architect of their own current economic woes – and it’s not something which the taxpayer and the station holder needs to fix. Those news sources which have been reporting the news with a strong leftward slant for 40 years have slowly but surely alienated about half of their potential audience, leaving them to fight it out for a significantly reduced audience share. The conservatives and right wing stopped paying attention, in some cases years ago.

      Simple common sense dictates that if you want to attract as many people to your newspaper, teevee news programme or news magazine, you need to accommodate both sides of whatever discussions you’re reporting in about the same light. It’s pretty clear that doesn’t happen much and the current fiscal problems of the news sector are the rather predictable result.

      Broaden your POV, moderate your editorial positions, give the right wing as much favourable coverage as the left wing and you might rebuild the audience of yore.

      • D-Vega

        I agree with most of what you said, martin.

        However, first of all I knew where the report was. But that’s not a report from the FCC. That’s a report from the “Free Press”. The think tank, not the gov’t agency.

        Secondly, this is not a proposition to nationalize the media. You can argue against whether gov’t should subsidize media, but this isn’t a takeover.

    • Anonymous

      Perhaps it isn’t nationalizing but it is frightening.

      Taxing successful companies to create competitors to those companies that people don’t want. It would be like taxing American automotive companies in order to pay for a government run automotive plant to provide electric cars and other hype-vehicles that don’t work and no one wants. Hm . . . bad example, but you get my drift.

      Government already funds NPR (it shouldn’t), we don’t need a massive expansion of that at the free markets expense (ultimately at our expense).

  • Anonymous

    Isn’t NPR a governmental entity? does it not get significant funding fromt he taxpayers? if so does that not mean it forfeits any censorship rights?

  • Proud Infidel

    “Man is not free unless government is limited.”
    “Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.”
    – Ronald Reagan

    And here goes Soros and his ilk on another control campaign. I wonder if he didn’t envy and worship Hitler like his fellow Nazi sellouts!

    • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

      Sort of; when the Nazis were rounding up Jews, he, a Jew, helped them. It was a horrible time and he was young… but he to this day doesn’t feel any regret for what he did.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info

Users Online