For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
‘Restoring’ Unions ‘Right’ to Bargain Collectively
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

Not long ago union advocate Stewart Acuff penned a piece for the Huffington website that was filled with soaring rhetoric about unions “creating the middle class” and pleading for voters to pressure Congress to pass the absurdly named Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). He claimed that this piece of… legislation would “restore the right to form unions and bargain collectively.”

Despite Acuff’s urgent pleading, however, he misses an elephant in the room. No one has taken anyone’s “right to collectively bargain” away from them. Of course that wasn’t the only thing that Acuff was factually incorrect about.

Why is it that union folks have to lie about everything, anyway?

Acuff starts out with a whopper.

America’s broad, deep Middle Class, indeed, the American Dream was formed in the 20-25 years after the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935 which codified the right of workers in America to freely form unions and bargain collectively.

Unions created the middle class? Unions got some mythical right by the Wagner Act? I’ll let friend to the blog David Denholm answer to this one…

Mr. Acuff must be from some alternative universe. The 1935 Wagner Act – the first National Labor Relations Act – didn’t give workers the right to form unions or to bargain collectively. Those rights existed all along. What it did was to compel employers to bargain with unions and give unions the right to impose representation on workers who didn’t want it.

Denholm notes that the middle class existed before unions ever did. In that he’s 100% correct. After all, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote about the extensive and prosperous middle class in America in the 1830s. That was a year or two before the 1935 Wagner Act passed, wouldn’t you say?

Additionally, if unions were so necessary to support an extensive middle class how come we have one of the biggest populations of middle class folks in the world yet unions are down to about 20 some percent of the total U.S. workforce?

Acuff whines that the middle class is disappearing because unions have somehow lost a right they didn’t really lose. Denholm again helps us with that claim. After giving us a link to some economic stats, Denholm writes…

This information is expressed in both current and constant dollars. There’s good news for those who fear a shrinking middle class. In constant 2007 dollars, average household income is up in every quintile. The growth isn’t steady and it isn’t uniform from quintile to quintile, but it is up across the board.

But Acuff doesn’t spare with more whoppers. He claims that the EFCA will fix everything (or is it fix what ain’t broken?).

Most importantly, we are very close to getting the support necessary to pass the Employee Free Choice Act which would simplify and streamline organizing, effectively punish employers who violate workers rights with $20,000 civil fines and triple damage back pay for firing workers, and force the Financial Elite to bargain in good faith with unions by allowing unions to seek arbitration for recalcitrant employers.

Not true at all. What the EFCA would do, however, is take away the right of every prospective union member to have a secret ballot when he casts his vote for or against unionizing, it would open that employee up for union thugs to visit his home to “encourage” him to vote yes, and it would cause government to involve itself to force a contract on union and employer alike. It would also further damage our business community by making it even less competitive than it currently is today.

Sadly, just about every scare word in Acuff’s piece is a lie. No one’s right to organize has been taken away. But unions have been slowly disappearing from the work force, it is true. Of course, it isn’t because of forces outside of unions that are destroying them. It is the over reach, sloth, bad business sense, and mistreatment of their own membership that is causing the downfall of unions, not the lack of passage of the EFCA.

Unions have served their purpose. It’s time to let them fade into history.

(Originally posted at TheUnionLabelBlog.com)

0
  • tblrk2006

    Unions are useless today. Their time was long ago when the govt wasnt up every businesses ass.

  • Power_System_Oper

    tblrk2006: “Unions are useless today.

    Then you need to read what Northrup stated for the reason that they were dropping out of the bidding for the new Air Force Tanker which that company would have put togethr in “Right to Work for Less” state of Alabama. They said that the risks were just too high that they would lose money on the deal since they had to bid the condtract at at fixed price rather than cost plus. Yet Boeing is fully confident in bidding the contract at a fixed price while building the Tanker with a unionize work force in the State of Washington which is a closed shop state.

    That says it all. Anybody can make a profit on a cost plus contract. But at the end of the day, Northrup felt that it stood a high risk of loosing a lot of money if it bid the contract at a fixed price while relying on a non unionized work force to deliver the product.

    The great side story is what a bunch of sore losers Alabama’s Governor and its two US Senators proved to be when Northrup stepped back from the brink of taking a crap shoot on the productivity of a non union work force.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    EFCA is a desperation attempt by the unions to swell their ranks in order to swell the contributions to their critically underfunded pension plans. We went over that a couple of days ago. If the unions can’t get EFCA passed, they’ll end up going to Congress to try and get a bailout, which in today’s political environment is not a popular option, nor is the outcome assured. The desperation part of the equation is that the baby boomers are on the cusp of retirement age – when they start retiring in large numbers, the underfunded union pension plans are going to collapse, unable to meet their obligations.

    As to the statement, “restore the right to form unions and bargain collectively”, that’s just political polemics. The right to form unions and the right to engage in collective bargaining has never been taken away by Congress, the Court or the Executive.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by Power_System_Oper
    2010-03-09 22:13:08

    Shut up hoggo your OPINION on the matter means nothing to the FACTS.

  • Smithwick

    I think it would be fair to say that unions arose concurrently with the middle class. It’s easy to make grand concessions to labor when the economy is growing and wages are increasing on their own. We’ve had labor movements in this country for a long time, they only really became successful when the market could bear them.

    Of course the time period they reference isn’t exactly like today. Europe and japan were still recovering from the war and china/india had yet to emerge as industrial powers. It’s easy to be an industrial giant when the rest of the world is either iron age peasants or smoking ruins. Not so true today. I suppose we could embark on a war of aggression to bomb the rest of the world flat, then sell them our manufactured goods to rebuild with. Then we could have a strong economy and strong unions.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info