ad banner for How the Left Was Won
Advertising Conservative Grapevine Email FAQ Home RSS Speaking Townhall YouTube
Beating liberalism to death with a shovel and a smile.



« Q&A Friday #65: What About The Republican Moderates Who May Vote With The Democrats To Surrender In September? | Main | Q&A Friday #65: The Ten Best Manly Action Films Of All-Time »
May 11, 2007
John Hawkins Q&A Friday #65: Would You Consider Voting For A Third Party Candidate Now?

Question: "Given the Republican's head-in-sand refusal to change their rhetoric about spending since their defeat last November (as evidenced by Tom Cole's recent "spending wasn't the problem" comment)... has your attitude about third parties changed at all?

Could you see yourself ever voting for a third party Presidential candidate if he was clearly more aligned with your political values than anybody else in the race?" -- President_Friedman

Answer: It wouldn't matter if a third party presidential candidate perfectly represented my positions on every single issue because with the way that our political system is set up, it's almost impossible for the third party candidate to win. And let's face it: the point of running for office is to win, so that you have a chance to influence government policy. In my book, you don't get any brownie points for being perfect on the issues and pulling 3% of the vote. In fact, candidates like that actually make it less likely that their views will be represented in government, because they drain support away from the candidate who is closest to their views that has a chance to win.

Rate this article:

Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)

BlinklistBlogMarksdel.icio.usDiggFurlMagnoliaNewsvineRedditStumbleuponTechnorati
    Share this article!
John Hawkins | 10:45 AM | Permalink   Comments (164)   Trackbacks (0)

Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry closed on May 16, 2007 10:45 AM
Most commented on recent posts
  Barack The Magic Negro's Next Trick: Killing Chip Saltsman's RNC Chair Bid (119 comments)
  The USA Isn't Going To Break-Up In 2010, But... (98 comments)
  British Bureauweenie Calls for Internet Suppression (76 comments)
  Obama, Israel, & The Muslim World (74 comments)
  The 7th Annual "20 Most Annoying Liberals Of 2008" (64 comments)
  There Goes the Neighborhood (64 comments)
  Thought Of The Day: Blago, Burris, And Reid (62 comments)
  Atheists Sue to Impose Their Religion on Inauguration (59 comments)
  This is Why Government Run Healthcare Will Ultimately Fail (54 comments)
  Dope on a Rope (43 comments)

Highest rated recent posts
  DUmmy Threads Of The Day: Those Cool French And Depleted Uranium [4.4 stars]
  A Fine Little Mess [4.2 stars]
  All The Tech In The World Won't Help You Without Enthusiastic Warm Bodies [4.2 stars]
  Death To All Juice! [4.2 stars]
  Senator Smalley And The Republican Problem He Reveals [4.1 stars]
  Gaza should thank Israel [4.1 stars]
  The USA Isn't Going To Break-Up In 2010, But... [4.1 stars]
  Conservative Grapevine Promo [4.1 stars]
  Why you're not treated like adults [4.0 stars]
  A New Year Dawns For Iraqi Sovereignty [3.9 stars]
  Predictions for 2009 [3.9 stars]

ad banner for Food shortage USA
© Copyright 2001-2008 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker