Well, a nut job like Corsi might go completely off the reservation, and start accusing Obama of having attended a madrasa during his formative years, or hanging around known terrorists from the 1960;s, or contributing money a racist organization masquerading as a church for 20 years... ummmm... no, wait...

The truth is the truth, no matter who speaks it. I would much rather McCain was revealing this stuff about Obama, but that's just not going to happen. Even leading conservatives aren't going after Obama's Marxist/black separatist past.
Corsi obviously has his faults, but he's doing something here that needs to be done, whether you like him or not.

Corsi is a loon but I love the fact that this book is doing so well and Pelosi's is not selling. I can't help it.
Robert108 said it right, it sucks to have to get Corsi along with a little examination of Obama. I am glad for the book. And may buy it this weekend just to help keep the sales up.

I have the previews of both Corsi's Obama book and David Freddoso's The Case Against Barack Obama on my Kindle, and it looks like Freddoso's is much better, more detailed, and better research.

That said, I have only read the first chapter of each, so, we'll see.

Well said, John Hawkins! I agree!

Well done John. I might quibble about Michael Moore - his observance of boundaries deserted him when he "confronted" Charlton Heston, and in his relentless one-sidedness in SICKO.

But while we are at it, can we toss a few more dishonest ranters in with Corsi? Arianna Huffington / the Democratic Underground bloggers / Anne Coulter / Van Helsing ??? mmmm?

If conservatism is going to have a future as the "thinking person's ideology," in contrast to the rampant and thought-free, emotive kneejerking of the left, we MUST distance ourselves from nutjobs like Corsi. The left can embrace their Michael Mooron, 9/11 Troofers and BDS infected nitwits - these people are simply carrying the normal "thinking" processes of the left to their logical conclusions - absurdity. The reason that reductio ad absurdum has little impact on a leftie in an argument is that, in their OWN addled brains, when you show them the ridiculous results of carrying out their nitwit programs, their internal reaction is "Yeah? What's wrong with THAT?"

We, OTOH, if we are going to be TRUE TO OUR PRINCIPLES, that we actually think before we speak or act, analyze our positions based on ACTUAL FACTS, and try to apply a little logic and reason to the process, we MUST NOT allow nitwits like Corsi to be our spokespeople - in this case, the messenger gives the lie to the message.

Much as I agree that we need MORE people researching and revealing the scary and pathetic truths about Obambi, we HAVE to do better than Corsi.

And, as much as the Left loves to hate Limbaugh and O'Reilly and Hannity, NO ONE who actually listens to them can credit the Left's stupid tropes of "hate speech" or even major lies/inaccuracies (in my experience, all THREE of them generally have their facts pretty much correct; it's where they GO with those facts that really drives the Left nuts). That's why they are as popular, and influential, as they are. (By the way, NONE of the foregoing is a personal endorsement - I find Limbaugh pompous and simplistic, O'Reilly an egomaniac, and Hannity a dimbulb, but they are STILL miles ahead of any leftwing redio commentators.)

For the same reasons as we need to run, not walk, away from Corsi, we need to stay the hell away from bony conservative harpy Ann Coulter. Again, her positions are usually correct; her rhetoric does our cause no good, and potentially much harm. If we NEED a female commentator to carry our views to women radio listeners or readers, Laura Ingraham is a MUCH better choice.

Even though I know that Hawkins has a personal spat going on with Corsi lingering from the series of posts he did on the North American Union, one still has to give credit where credit is due. Good, sensible, and honest posting, Hawkins.

Maybe so, Chris, maybe so.

I don't like the fact that one of the main Gurus of the SPP,{don't remember his name}, endorses the idea of a NAU,....money and all.

Those kinds of ideas sometimes turn into real deeds,....ala "EU".

Those people are nothing but dangerous elites, IMO, and given the chance, would do away with borders and soverignty on the holy alter of the almighty dollar.

I just think it pays to be vigilant,...and I sure as hell don't trust BOOSH either.

Why else would he refuse to close the border after 8 years?

Corsi may be wrong, but at least, he's bringing out the possibilities of what could happen, because of the fact that our govt ignores the will of the people most of the time.

IOW, the govt treats the constitution as "just another G.D. piece of paper"!

Chris, what it would take to "shake conspiracy" out of my mind, would be a good reason why BOOSH wants to give amnesty and stubbornly failed to secure the border for 8 years, even after "9/11"!

He wouldn't even enforce the employer laws until just recently,.....called Minute men "Vigilantes",.....let his a-hole buddy, Johnny Sutton, railroad Ramos and Campeon.

Jobs that Americans wouldn't do,....kissed Foxxs' ass,....allows Mexican military to cross our borders with impunity, threatening our BP agents.

The list goes on and on.

Where have you been all this time, Chris,...asleep?