So, what is one to do when the more expensive Global Warming friendly disposable diapers HURTS the environment more then the old-fashioned reusable? YOU BURY THE STORY, OF COURSE!:

A government report that found old-fashioned reusable nappies damage the environment more than disposables has been hushed up because ministers are embarrassed by its findings.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has instructed civil servants not to publicise the conclusions of the £50,000 nappy research project and to adopt a "defensive" stance towards its conclusions.

The report found that using washable nappies, hailed by councils throughout Britain as a key way of saving the planet, have a higher carbon footprint than their disposable equivalents unless parents adopt an extreme approach to laundering them.

I just want to make sure I understand this correctly. The Global Warming alarmists, who insist their is such a thing as Global Warming and have rang the bell on a soon to be extinct agenda if mankind doesn't change our evil ways, are actually doing MORE damage then good!

Some one pinch me, this is to good to be real.

But wait there's more. The Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip, has also weighed in on Global Warming and decided that families are to big, and suggests that family size should be curbed:

Now the Duke of Edinburgh has turned his thoughts to solving the global food crisis.

Prince Philip emerges in a television interview this week as the model royal "eco-warrior" who believes overpopulation has contributed to the pressures on the world and that anyone who believes in God should go green.

The duke hints that curbing family sizes may be the best means of keeping the soaring cost of staple food products, such as bread and rice, in check.

Maybe we should start with curbing the size of his family, and let's see how that goes.

Still not rolling on the floor with laughter yet? How about this little diddy about temperatures going DOWN rather then UP:

In early September, I began noticing a string of news stories about scientists rejecting the orthodoxy on global warming. Actually, it was more like a string of guest columns and long letters to the editor since it is hard for skeptical scientists to get published in the cabal of climate journals now controlled by the Great Sanhedrin of the environmental movement.

Still, the number of climate change skeptics is growing rapidly. Because a funny thing is happening to global temperatures -- they're going down, not up.

So, what have we learned here today boys and girls?, besides the usual theme that Liberals are nuts and clueless.

I think the lesson learned is that when they are called on the carpet on this crap, when the truth is revealed, and their "theories" are blown out of the water, they lie and deny as we have seen in the examples above.