ad banner for Melontown gets a new mayor
Advertising Email FAQ Home RSS Search Speaking Townhall YouTube
Kneecapping Barack Obama at every opportunity.
« WaPo's Ode to a Harpy's Arms | Main | Seven Issues Where the GOP Should Adopt the "Party of No" Label »
May 11, 2009
McQ Rising Thugocracy?

First we have the "car czar" threatening investors with audits and vilification, and now we have a report that a union was inappropriately involved in matters in which it should not have been included:

Officials in the governor's office say a politically powerful union may have had inappropriate influence over the Obama administration's decision to withhold billions of dollars in federal stimulus money from California if the state does not reverse a scheduled wage cut for the labor group's workers.

The officials say they are particularly troubled that the Service Employees International Union, which lobbied the federal government to step in, was included in a conference call in which state and federal officials reviewed the wage cut and the terms of the stimulus package.


The SEIU is of the opinion the state is "breaking the law" as it concerns the use of "stimulus" funds. The state sees it otherwise. But that doesn't explain the inclusion of the union on the call. Said state officials:
During the conference call, state officials say, they were asked to defend the $74-million cut scheduled to take effect July 1. The cut lowers the state's maximum contribution to home health workers' pay from $12.10 per hour to $10.10.

The California officials on the call, who requested anonymity for fear of antagonizing the Obama administration, said they needed the savings to help balance the state budget.


Most know that California is a budgetary basket case, but they should also know that SEIU members are the one's effected by the cut. The phrase which is most chilling in the last cite is that which indicates a fear of "antagonizing the Obama administration" among state workers.

Is that really the atmosphere that should exist between the states and the feds? And, given their inclusion in the call, isn't it fair to claim that the SEIU has had "undue" influence with the administration?

So how is this different than the alleged inappropriate lobbyist influence the left liked to holler about during the Bush years?

[Crossposted at QandO]

Facebook MySpace Twitter del.icio.us Digg Newsvine Propeller Reddit Stumbleupon Technorati
    Share this article!
I like! I don't like. Score: 11 McQ | 06:08 PM | Permalink  

Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry closed on May 16, 2009 06:10 PM

ad banner for Justice Sotomayor
© Copyright 2001-2009 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker