Q&A Friday #112: What Do You Think The Effect Of Statistical Analysis Will Be On Punditry In Upcoming Elections?

Question: Oooh! What do you think the effect of statistical analysis – a la Sam Wang at PEC or that Nate guy that everybody loves – on punditry in upcoming elections? — MightyMooMan

For all of the talk about Nate Silver’s model and “statistical analysis,” all he essentially did was look at the state polls and applied the Monte Carlo method to it. In other words, Nate Silver was right because the state polls correctly predicted the winners of the races. Had Gallup and Rasmussen turned out to be the ones that were right while the other pollsters were overestimating the support Democrats were drawing, Silver would have been wrong and everyone would be talking about what an idiot he is today.

As to what effect it will have, it just means that everyone will probably take the state polling data at face value in 2014. As long as it keeps working, everyone will essentially come up with the same results that Nate Silver does, without using any “statistical analysis” of consequence, just by looking at the polls. If and when the state polls are wrong again, Nate Silver and everyone else will turn out to be wrong, too.

Also see...

Related Articles

10

Could The United States Break-Up? (Q&A Friday #110)

FacebookTwitterEmail Question: America is a simmering cauldron of social unrest; some justified, some not. Should things boil over and become

188

Q&A Thursday #105: Should We Put Tariffs On China?

FacebookTwitterEmail Question: I would like to hear your thoughts on Tariffs, why not use our trade deficit to attack our

28

Q&A Friday #104: Should We Still Have Troops In Germany And Japan?

FacebookTwitterEmail Question: Why don’t we bring the troops home from Germany and Japan etc? Is it really worth the hundreds

Share This

Share this post with your friends!