For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Liberals Agreeing With Conservatives On The Deficit In Quotes
Written By : John Hawkins

(Over the next couple of years, we can expect Republicans in Congress to propose and vote for a lot of spending cuts. Unfortunately, the Democrats will probably sink most of those cuts. So, with that in mind, I thought it might be useful to have a list of quotes from Democrats talking about what a problem spending has become. Not only does that show what hypocrites they are, it’ll be nice to break out their own quotes when Republicans need to make a case for cutting spending. Enjoy!)

(Deficits are) not something that is 10 years away. It affects the markets currently. It is possible that bond markets will become worried about the sustainability [of yearly deficits over $1 trillion], and we may find ourselves facing higher interest rates even today. — Ben Bernanke

If we don’t do something about it, they [debts] could and may become a national security issue. — Joe Biden

Congress must end the rise in the debt-to-GDP ratio and keep our growth in obligations in line with our growth in resources. With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can’t come close to bridging that sort of gap. — Warren Buffet

This debt that we have in America is unsustainable. Every dollar we spend in Washington we borrow 40 cents and that means whether you’re buying missles in the Pentagon or food stamps in Department of Health and Human Services, we’re borrowing that money from China. — Dick Durbin

The nation’s fiscal path is “unsustainable,” and the problem “cannot be solved through minor tinkering,” the head of the Congressional Budget Office said Thursday morning. — Doug Elmendorf

There is a much greater recognition across the U.S. political system that our fiscal position is unsustainable in the long-run. It’s going to require substantial effort to bring that under control. Political will is not fully manifest at the moment but it’s coming, there’s no alternative to it. We can’t grow our way out of it. — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

Even with this substantial deficit reduction, the Nation will still face unsustainable medium- and long-term deficits. — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Peter Orszag, White House Director of Management and Budget, and Christina Romer, Chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

The threat of fiscal turmoil is concrete, not abstract—and it will be felt in the life of every American. Unsustainable debt eventually means skyrocketing interest rates—and that makes it harder to get a college education, to start a business, to buy a house, to plan a future.

No other issue calls so strongly for leaders who understand the importance of hard choices and hard truths. No other issue calls so strongly for citizens who know what it takes to keep a republic—the wise sacrifice today that helps our children prosper tomorrow. — Steny Hoyer

My prediction is that politicians will eventually be tempted to resolve the [fiscal] crisis the way irresponsible governments usually do: by printing money, both to pay current bills and to inflate away debt. And as that temptation becomes obvious, interest rates will soar. — Paul Krugman

Our first task is to sustain and deepen the economic recovery to spur new job creation in the face of unsustainable budget deficits. At the same time … it’ll take tough choices and putting partisanship aside to do what’s right for the country today, what’s right for our children and what’s right for our grandchildren. — Jacob Lew, Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget

We can’t keep on just borrowing from China. We have to pay interest on that debt, and that means we are mortgaging our children’s future with more and more debt. — Barack Obama

But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same. — Barack Obama

The nation faces a nasty dual deficit problem: a painful jobs deficit in the near term and an unsustainable budget deficit over the medium and long term. — Peter Orszag, the former director of the White House Office of Management and Budget

After years of historic deficits, this 110th Congress will commit itself to a higher standard: Pay as you go, no new deficit spending. Our new America will provide unlimited opportunity for future generations, not burden them with mountains of debt. — Nancy Pelosi

Because most Americans know that increasing debt is the last thing we should be doing. After all, I repeat, the Baby Boomers are about to retire. Under the circumstances, any credible economist would tell you we should be reducing debt, not increasing it. — Harry Reid

I worry that with a trillion deficit this year and next year, 2012, and for as far as the eye can see, eventually, not this year, but the next year, the markets are going to wake up and say, this is unsustainable. There is going to be market pressure and we will be forced to do the tough adjustments.

…Well, you know, if we don’t do the adjustment early on and we need to raise taxes and/or cut spending, I would spend — cut more on the spending side than on the revenue side, then there are two options. (INAUDIBLE) cannot borrow on their own currency, you can only default a la Greece.

In a country like the U.S. where you can monetize the budget deficit, run the printing presses, monetizing the fiscal deficit eventually leads to inflation. So we’re not going to have a default in the United States, that is not the option on the table. But we could have high inflation if we don’t fix our fiscal problems. — Nouriel Roubini

Everyone agrees that over the long-term we have got to reduce the record-breaking $13.7 trillion national debt and unsustainable federal deficit. — Bernie Saunders

0
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

    Everyone agrees that the deficit is a problem. Everyone doesn’t agree on how to solve it. Democrats prefer both revenue increases (letting tax cuts expire on the rich) and mild spending cuts across the board. Republicans prefer no revenue increases, and harsher spending cuts to discretionary spending.

    As Texas has shown, the no revenue increases, harsher spending cuts across the board doesn’t work, unless you want a significant decrease in core services while having the problem persist.

    • StanW

      Republicans want to cut taxes across the board, which has bene shown to INCREASE revenues.

      And Democrats do not want “mild spending cuts across the board”, they want massive spending cuts in the military, and massive spending INCREASES in everything else

      • http://www.fullervision.net/newslog.html J. Myrle Fuller

        Under that logic, the ideal rate would be zero. Then the government would be raking in the dough. Oh, wait. Zero x anything = still zero.

        The problem with the Laffer Curve is that you get to a point where reducing tax rates eventually DOES hurt total revenue. Right now we have about half the people in this country that are earning more in tax credits than they are paying taxes on their income.

        • StanW

          Reducing taxes has traditionally resulted in revenue increases. You can make inane comments about that, but it is undeniable true.

          Tax credits are a different subject and have little to do with tax cuts.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

            It’s undeniably true that we go from a situation where record revenue is achieved every year to not achieving record revenue for 10 years after reducing taxes.

            Sure that’s a revenue increase. If you don’t factor in the spending increases due to a growing population in that time frame as well.

          • StanW

            The only thing not factored into the revenue increases that Congress always passes.

            When Reagan was president and his tax increases brought in new revenue, Tip O’Niell and the Democrat coltrolled Congress Spent three NEW dollars for every new dollar reagan brought in.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

            Except for the part where they didn’t spend three dollars for every new dollar brought in?

            http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy05/hist.html

            There was 1.45 of new spending for each dollar of new revenue, of on budget. Total budget is 1.21 of new spending for each dollar of new revenue. In a period marked by

            Nearly 1 for 1 in an era marked by $143 billion in reduced revenue due to tax cuts.

            http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/09/reagan-tax-increases/

            Throw in that lost revenue? 0.95 was spent for every new dollar in revenue.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

            Except for the part where they didn’t spend three dollars for every new dollar brought in?

            http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy05/hist.html

            There was 1.45 of new spending for each dollar of new revenue, of on budget. Total budget is 1.21 of new spending for each dollar of new revenue. In a period marked by

            Nearly 1 for 1 in an era marked by $143 billion in reduced revenue due to tax cuts.

            http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/09/reagan-tax-increases/

            Throw in that lost revenue? 0.95 was spent for every new dollar in revenue.

        • Anonymous

          Uh . . . at no point does the laffer curve state zero percent taxes will yield the greatest return.

          http://www.timswineblog.com/images/laffer%20curve.gif

          It clearly shows that taxes which are either too high or too low can negatively affect the total revenue accumulated.

          No one I can think of has seriously argued that the rate should be zero.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

        They’ve been shown to increase revenues.

        10 years down the road after the economy and population has grown enough to offset the lost revenue, and increase the amount of spending required to meet demand for services such as medicare, education, or social security.

        Year over year increases in spending to meet demand isn’t a massive spending increase. Just like a year over year increase in tax revenues isn’t a massive revenue increase. It’s simply a function of a growing population and economy.

    • Anonymous

      As California has shown, raising taxes and mild spending cuts will not work.

      Texas ain’t on the verge of total collapse.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

        Except for where the California state/local tax burden has remained largely unchanged over the past decade, and instead has focused on deep cuts to try to balance their budget?

        Oh hey, another instance where no tax increases and massive cuts has led to budget problems!

        Thanks for helping me prove my point.

    • Anonymous

      Everyone agrees that the deficit is a problem.

      No, only one side agrees. Our side. Your side is proposing massive new spending increases.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Danny-Browning/1666222445 Danny Browning

        Please show me where Democrats have proposed massive spending increases.

        And no, you can’t make up your own budget numbers to say that Obamacare is increasing spending. Even using Ryan’s assumptions, it was still shown to decrease spending.

  • Anonymous

    Liberals are very vocal on the threat posed by long term uncontrolled deficits . . . incurred while a republican is in the whitehouse and republicans control the congress.

    Otherwise they don’t matter.

  • Anonymous

    Yet all call for “investment= spending”
    Hipocrite don’t even cover this.

  • Anonymous

    NO lunatic-left d-crat socialist will ever even think about the possibility of limiting massive BIG GOVERNMENT spending or control over the American people.

    Why?

    “You Lie!” hussein cares about the deficit greatly and he wants to MASSIVELY INCREASE IT EVEN MORE because that his is WEAPON TO DESTROY WHAT HE HATES: AMERICA.

    The ENEMIES of AMERICA, the lunatic-left d-crat socialists and the chinese communists, are working together to destroy our country. Anybody who isn’t aware of that has got to be even more mentally defective than a lunatic-lefty. Khrushchev had it wrong when he issued is hollow claim that “We will bury you !” The Chinese communists have an approach that will work: “We will OWN you !” With the unlimited help from the out-of-control spending, massive deficits and debt and actions favoring china over America of the d-crat socialists, they very likely will succeed.

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info

Users Online