For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Best Quotes From Ann Coulter’s 2010 Columns (34 Quotes)
Written By : John Hawkins

(Here are the best quotes, according to me at least, from Ann Coulter’s 2010 columns. Enjoy!)

In 2005, Vice President Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity. He also shot a lawyer in the face, which I think should count for something.

On average, a person who attends religious services and does not believe in the redistribution of income will give away 100 times more — and 50 times more to secular charities — than a person who does not attend religious services and strongly believes in the redistribution of income.

I feel so much more confident that the TSA’s nude photos of airline passengers will never be released now that I know the government couldn’t even prevent half a million classified national security documents from being posted on WikiLeaks.

Liberals don’t care. Their approach is to rip out society’s foundations without asking if they serve any purpose. Why do we have immigration laws? What’s with these borders? Why do we have the institution of marriage, anyway? What do we need standardized tests for? Hey, I like Keith Richards — why not make heroin legal? Let’s take a sledgehammer to all these load-bearing walls and just see what happens!

Establishment Republicans are always telling Christian conservatives to put our issues aside because they’re not popular — and then moderate Republicans go on to lose elections, while conservative Republicans win in landslides. (It’s almost as if the voters couldn’t care less who David Brooks thinks they should vote for!)

Whenever you see a liberal choking up over our precious constitutional rights, you can be sure we’re talking about the rights of Muslims at ground zero, “God Hates F@gs” funeral protesters, strippers, The New York Times publishing classified documents, pornographers, child molesters, murderers, traitors, saboteurs, terrorists, flag-burners (but not Quran-burners!) or women living on National Endowment of the Arts grants by stuffing yams into their orifices on stage.

The reason not to burn Qurans is that it’s unkind — not to jihadists, but to Muslims who mean us no harm. The same goes for building a mosque at ground zero — in both cases, it’s not a question of anyone’s “rights,” it’s just a nasty thing to do.

The nonsense about President Obama being a Muslim has got to stop. I rise to defend him from this absurd accusation by pointing out that he is obviously an atheist.

It is a fact that any non-retarded person (thank you, Rahm Emanuel!) sitting in the Rev. Wright’s church for 20 minutes, much less 20 years, does not believe in God. Even stepping inside Wright’s church for a moment to get out of the rain is borderline racist.

I think we should look at other countries’ laws, then adopt the good ones and pass on the bad ones. For example, let’s skip clitorectomies, arranged marriages, dropping walls on homosexuals, honor killings and the rest of the gorgeous tapestry of multiculturalism. Instead, how about we adopt foreign concepts such as disallowing frivolous lawsuits, having loser-pays tort laws, and requiring that both parents be in the U.S. legally and at least one parent be a citizen, for a child born here to get automatic citizenship?

Obama hasn’t ramped up the war in Afghanistan based on a careful calculation of America’s strategic objectives. He did it because he was trapped by his own rhetorical game of bashing the Iraq war while pretending to be a hawk on Afghanistan.

Based on Obama’s rules of engagement for our troops in Afghanistan, we’re apparently not even fighting a war. The greatest fighting force in the world is building vocational schools and distributing cheese crackers to children. There’s even talk of giving soldiers medals for NOT shooting people, which I gather will be awarded posthumously. Naomi Campbell is rougher with her assistants than our troops are allowed to be with Taliban fighters.

But liberals see the Supreme Court as their backup legislature, giving them all the laws Democrats can’t pass themselves because they’d be voted out of office if they did. Can’t get Americans to approve of abortion? Get the Supreme Court to do it! Can’t get Americans to ban the death penalty? Get the Supreme Court to do it! Can’t get Americans to release criminals? Get the Supreme Court to do it!

As Stan Evans says, whatever liberals disapprove of, they want banned (smoking, guns, practicing Christianity, ROTC, the Pledge of Allegiance) and whatever they approve of, they make mandatory (abortion-on-demand, gay marriage, pornography, condom distribution in public schools, screenings of “An Inconvenient Truth”).

In all, 20 candidates for the House or Senate in 2002 spent at least $1 million of their own money on their campaigns; 19 of the 20 lost, generally to more experienced candidates.

The president finally went down to take a look at the oil disaster last week –- which is weird because I didn’t even know there were golf courses near the Gulf. To show his concern, Obama is thinking about returning some of the nearly $1 million the oil industry donated to his campaign. Ha, ha — just kidding. He’s not returning any oil money.

Incidentally, why do so many Bill Clinton stories end with the words “nothing improper happened”?

I just want to say: I think it’s fantastic that the Democrats have finally come out against race discrimination. Any day now, maybe they’ll come out for fighting the Cold War. Perhaps 100 years from now, they’ll be ready to fight the war on terrorism or champion the rights of the unborn. It would be a big help, though, if Democrats could support good causes when it mattered.

Roughly since the Harding administration, Wall Street has overwhelmingly favored Democrats. According to a recent report from ABC News, for example, the five largest hedge funds gave “almost all their donations to Democrats.”

When six Germans and two Americans were suspected of plotting an attack on U.S. munitions plants during World War II, FDR immediately ordered them arrested and tried in a secret military tribunal held behind closed doors at the Department of Justice. Within weeks, all were found guilty. Six of the eight, including one U.S. citizen, were given the electric chair. One German was sentenced to life in prison and the other American citizen — who had turned himself in and revealed the plot to the FBI — got 30 years.

But after the car bomber, the diaper bomber and the Fort Hood shooter, it has become increasingly clear that Obama’s only national defense strategy is: Let’s hope their bombs don’t work!

(Obama) has apologized to the entire Muslim world for the French and English colonizing them — i.e. building them flush toilets.

There’s nothing wrong with speculation, creating derivatives or selling them, especially to sophisticated investors. The problem is that when the bets go bad, the speculators keep being back-stopped by the government — i.e., “by me and people like me.”

What’s curious about the left’s current obsession with Timothy McVeigh is that it proves that — despite a frantic search for 15 years — liberals have come across no better evidence of burgeoning “right-wing extremist” violence than a drug-taking, self-described “agnostic” who was thrown out of the Michigan Militia and who proclaimed, “Science is my religion.” That sounds more like Bill Maher than Rush Limbaugh.

Thanks to idiot lawyers, who think it makes them sound smart to say “Black is white” and “Up is down,” one of the biggest problems in society today is the refusal to draw lines. Here’s a nice bright line: Holding malevolent signs outside the funeral of an American serviceman who died defending his country constitutes intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Until trial lawyers are screaming bloody murder, there has been no medical malpractice reform.

Since arriving in Canada I’ve been accused of thought crimes, threatened with criminal prosecution for speeches I hadn’t yet given and denounced on the floor of the Parliament (which was nice because that one was on my “bucket list”). Posters advertising my speech have been officially banned, while posters denouncing me are plastered all over the University of Ottawa campus. Elected officials have been prohibited from attending my speeches. Also, the local clothing stores are fresh out of brown shirts. Welcome to Canada!

Of course, an insurance company has to be able to refuse NEW customers with “pre-existing conditions.” Otherwise, everyone would just wait to get sick to buy insurance. It’s the same reason you can’t buy fire insurance on a house that’s already on fire. That isn’t an “insurance company”; it’s what’s known as a “Christian charity.

Like Hollywood actresses, lawyers need to believe they’re noble and courageous to help them forget that they are corporate drones doing soul-destroying work, which mostly consists of making photocopies.

You will notice a pattern developing: We only hear paeans to the “American tradition of zealous representation of unpopular clients” when it’s being used to defend causes popular with liberals — serial killers, terrorists and a horny hick who promised to save partial-birth abortion.

Despite Obama’s personal magnetism, the Iranian president persists in moving like gangbusters to build nuclear weapons, leading to Ahmadinejad’s announcement last week that Iran is now a “nuclear state.” Gee, that’s weird — because I remember being told in December 2007 that all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded that Iran had ceased nuclear weapons development as of 2003.

That is Obama’s signature move: Invent “people” who are “saying” ridiculous things and then encourage the audience to laugh at these made-up buffoons.

For the past two decades, Democrats have specialized in insulating financial giants from the consequences of their own high-risk bets. Citigroup and Goldman Sachs alone have been rescued from their risky bets by unwitting taxpayers four times in the last 15 years. Bankers get all the profits, glory and bonuses when their flimflam bets pay off, but the taxpayers foot the bill when Wall Street firms’ bets go bad on — to name just three examples — Mexican bonds (1995), Thai, Indonesian and South Korean bonds (1997), and Russian bonds (1998).

As a result, for the past four decades, American politics has consisted of Republicans controlling Washington for eight to 14 years — either from the White House or Capitol Hill — thus allowing Americans to forget what it was they didn’t like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in. The Democrats immediately remind Americans what they didn’t like about Democrats, and their power is revoked at the voters’ first possible opportunity.

0
  • Coulters aMan

    Fanboy John, you should make a list of your favorite Joe the plumber quotes.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      Wow some comeback, you got there can’t attack the messages so instead attack the messenger, typical liberal.

      • Anonymous

        Not only did he attack the messenger, but he and the left have no qualms attacking an average working citizen who has the audacity to speak what’s on his mind no matter how mild and sincere.

    • StanW

      Anything Ann Coulter-related on this board always brings out the hate from the Left.

      John, you shoudl do a Michelle Malkin quote thread soon. That will REALLY get your hit-count up! ;)

    • Anonymous

      Well nothing could top “Coulters aMan” for originality and intellectual depth. Not to mention the implicit hate crime against transgenders you’re invoking.

    • Anonymous

      Flagged for trolling, sock puppet posting, and offensive screen names.

      TR

  • Coulters aMan

    Fanboy John, you should make a list of your favorite Joe the plumber quotes.

  • Anonymous

    “allowing Americans to forget what it was they didn’t like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in.”

    I’ve noticed this pattern for quite some time. The Republicans do the heavy lifting, make the hard and sometimes unpopular choices, do what needs to be done as opposed to what the polls say. Things get good, things get stable. Then the public votes in the Dems because, hey things are pretty good and no big issues to wrestle, and the Dems are promising unicorns. The Dems quickly mess things up and in come the Republicans to right the ship again.

    • Thelonegunman

      And that’s why the six years of George W Bush’s administration where the GOP had the majorities in the Senate and Congress were the greatest years in my lifetime.

      • Anonymous

        I’m guessing it was a pretty low bar.

        • Nick Shaw

          Ahhh, a citizen of the Union of Socialist Provinces of Canada chimes in. Tell me, at what height is the bar in your country?

          • Anonymous

            3 meters

          • Russellshoats

            He didn’t ask how far your head is up your a$$…

    • Benny

      You have to love the American Sheeple!!!

    • Benny

      You have to love the American Sheeple!!!

  • Good Ol Boy

    “Welcome to Canada!”

    You know, I’m never really been a big fan of Ms. Coulter’s, but having read this account of how maliciously she’s treated by the left, and knowing that she has to deal with this shite on a regular basis, if not daily… well, she’s garnered my sympathy and support.

  • Kamel

    Really smart and right on target. Ann Rules!

  • http://oldretiredpettyofficer.blogspot.com/ ORPO1

    Oh! I do love that lady!

    • Russellshoats

      Me too…

  • http://twitter.com/palebluemote Jason Jenkins

    It’s good to see that irrelevance hasn’t stopped Anne Coulter from being fabulously delusional.

    • Anonymous

      You know when Coulter has the left’s number because they immediately resort to personal attacks.

    • MissA

      Still fuming over the whole Restraining Order thing?

  • Anonymous

    She is so quick, so sharp and so profound !!!!! Simply admire her.

  • C5085858

    The Anne Coulter formula:
    1) introduce a controversial issue.
    2) think – what would the thickest, vilest right wing extremist cretin think about this?
    3) write this down.
    4) mention that you are a Christian.
    5) introduce some unsubstantiated figures to support your point
    6) again mention that you are Christian – this is to demonstrate that what you are saying is undeniably true.
    7) edit – think to yourself ‘this sounds too measured’. Introduce some additional insulting/hurtful/xenophobic/ridiculous/blatantly false comments
    8) publish
    9) wait for responses – these will generally be in the form of whoooo hooooo, WE LOVE YOU ANNE! or Yeah, f*ck those liberal queers. Pay careful attention to any response which is a bit too anodyne – this will most certainly be a ‘typical liberal’. This person can be addressed in the next column, and by addressed read unjustifiably abused. Be sure to mention you are Christian again beforehand.
    10) cash cheques.
    11) repeat formula, knowing you have a fan base of the most ridiculous people in the world.

    • Anonymous

      Again, no attempt to refute her actual arguments, just a series of personal attacks (this time against her fans as well). Your complete and total lack of a counter-argument is quite obvious.

      • C5085858

        Hi mightysamurai. I don’t exactly understand what you mean by ‘refute her arguments’. She doesn’t so much make ‘arguments’ as spout bile. She is a polemicist who attempts to elicit maximum reaction, both positive from her drooling fans and negative from anyone even slightly left of fascist. She is one of the driving forces which has altered American political discourse from rational intelligent debate, to crazy-eyed hysterical name calling and Glenn Beck-style insanity.
        Of course she does use ‘factual’ instances to support this bile, which validate that bile in the eyes of those aforementioned drooling fans. As an example, in her most recent column on guns, she mentions the well known John Lott study as definitive proof that concealed-carry laws had a major effect on multiple-shooting incidents.
        A bit of a search reveals that this entire section of her column has been cut and pasted from a book she published in 2008 ‘If Democrats Had Any Brains…’, and had been previously cut and pasted into a 2009 piece she wrote titled “Liberal Victimhood…” These same stats, verbatim, were paraded in a column she wrote in 2007 on gun-free zones around schools. It was from this article that she cut and pasted the section in her book which was then used again in 2009 and again earlier this week.
        So not only is she re-hashing old arguments, but they are arguments based on a study which has been largely discredited when peer reviewed. Some very right leaning commentators have said ‘the Liberals can’t disprove Lott’ and then more rational, centralist types say he used very dodgy logic to draw his conclusions which really can’t be seen as definitive proof of anything. Again this came out when the paper was peer reviewed, and even if you don’t believe the majority of the scientific community that found his findings were dodgy, it is indeed a study which has not been proved definitively correct – this is the nature of peer review, right? And yet this is the basis for bile spew after bile spew.
        One could go on dissecting her columns for bile based on mis-information, or false information, or just horrid unjustifiable mean-spiritedness; all from this constantly self-proclaiming Christian. But surely this isn’t what you have in mind? Who would have the time, or the inclination, to read that much Ann Coulter? She’s just not very interesting.

        • Anonymous

          I don’t exactly understand what you mean by ‘refute her arguments’.

          Yeah, I gathered. That’s why you launch personal attacks instead. You don’t know how to refute her arguments.

          • C5085858

            But that was a qualified statement, qualified by everything that followed in my response? Oh, I see, you are an idiot. Fair enough!

          • Anonymous

            But that was a qualified statement

            Only in the mind of a liberal does a long stream of personal attacks count as a “qualified statement”.

            This isn’t hard to understand, son. If you disagree with Ann Coulter, refute her arguments instead of hurling insults. If her arguments are as shaky as you claim, it should be easy.

          • Anonymous

            But that was a qualified statement

            Only in the mind of a liberal does a long stream of personal attacks count as a “qualified statement”.

            This isn’t hard to understand, son. If you disagree with Ann Coulter, refute her arguments instead of hurling insults. If her arguments are as shaky as you claim, it should be easy.

          • Russellshoats

            But then, isn’t that typical for a libtard????

        • Martmw

          Interesting enough, though, for YOU to comment on ……over and over again

        • Martmw

          Interesting enough, though, for YOU to comment on ……over and over again

        • butMYdesign

          Unfortunately for you the majority of academic studies, in fact, fell on the side of John Lott and even those that disagreed with his findings admitted that gun carry laws do not affect the rate of violent crimes one way or another.

          If you are so much smarter than Coulter readers, why must you refute her arguments by deferring to an imaginary scientific consensus? Why can you not on your own accord refute her point? I’ll wager it is because you cannot argue against common sense. Can you really deny that those innocent people with their own guns kept more people from getting killed? That is the point. There is a faction of society that is slowly trying to take guns out of the hands of all citizens–responsible or otherwise–so that they may be gunned down defenseless by those who obtained guns by illegal means (a distinct possibility by the way). No, that is not their intention but that will be the result, and I know that because it HAS been the result in such situations.

    • Tropictrix

      Let me guess – you probably also believe that “guns kill people”?

      If guns kill people, then cars cause drunk driving accidents, pencils misspell words and spoons make people fat.

      liberal b@st@rds….

      • C5085858

        That’s good, original thinking. I like to see that. You should try to intern for Ann! No, I understand that guns are inanimate objects, devoid of hopes and desires and the ability to hop around shooting people and such. And I’m not particularly opposed to gun ownership, albeit with the caveat that I think there needs to be effective screening in place before a gun can be purchased. You may argue that currently exists, but obviously you would be incorrect. We could go on with Second Amendment stuff all day, but I didn’t mention anything about gun control, but it is obviously something of a bugbear for you. I hope it all works out. And again, great stuff with the spoon and the pencil. You’re a brain-trust of one.

        • Westernwit

          You did, in fact, mention something “about gun control”.
          I like many others here are curious and hope you can explain why Ms Coulter if faulted for “rehashing” old columns or articles. Once accurate do they somehow gain a patina of 1/4 truth or 1/2 truth over time…? Oh!, Forgive me, I forgot a liberal was arguing. (See A. Coulters quote on how Liberals think history began yesterday..

  • mw

    Miss Coulter is absolutely right, wonderfully prescient, and the most entertaining political writer on the scene. Scrape away the blarney, cut through the bs, research and vet the facts, and then poke ‘em in the eye with humor. She’s irreplaceable.

  • ZaphodX

    “For example, let’s skip clitorectomies, arranged marriages, dropping walls on homosexuals, honor killings and the rest of the gorgeous tapestry of multiculturalism.”

    Ann couldn’t think of any other multi-cultural tapestry examples? And, arranged marriages? What’s her beef with that?

    Why pick what somebody else likes and call it idiotic. The arranged marriages still have a good track record and have stood the test of time. It is not like there are a lot of people from other parts of the world creating laws for you to follow it. If you want to follow it, great. If you don’t want to follow it, great. Why do you care so much.

  • drstick@telus .net

    Ann is the Best!!! She calls it as it is. Saw her in Calgary, Alberta, Canada and she really was able to keep her head above the few protesters/liberals,etc, without much effort. Please keep up your valid comments re Prez. ODamna?

  • Samadvocate

    In reading a few more sleaze type anti-Annas, it has to be noted that to tolerate this type of Person(?) is best and ignore totally. Ciao.

  • ken4285

    Re: Ann Coulter’s downright criminal treatment at the hands of U. of Ottawa students, faculty, and members of the administration.

    “Ottawa: a subarctic lumber village converted by royal mandate to a political cockpit.”

Advertisement
Featured Video

Who Is Brett Kimberlin?

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info