For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
The Best Quotes From “Why Men Are The Way They Are”
Written By : John Hawkins

Warren Farrell became interested in the women’s movement and as he learned more about it, he became more and more sympathetic to it. As Farrell heard complaints from women about men, he became interested. Why were men behaving like this? What was the reasoning behind it? Over time, as he did more research, he came up with the answers and turned it into an outstanding book, Why Men Are the Way They Are.

Because the book defends men, some people may assume it’s anti-woman or conservative. Actually, my perception is that Farrell is actually a little bit to the left-of-center and the book doesn’t take shots at women or feminism. It’s just an intriguing alternative viewpoint with a lot of truth to it, that surprisingly few people have previously considered.

Together, we came to understand how we beg men to express feelings, but then when men do express feelings, we call it sexism, male chauvinism, or backlash. — XXVII

Women are still taught to be sexually cautious until two, three, or all four conditions — attraction, respect, emotions, and intellect — are met. Many women add fifth and sixth conditions: singleness and status/success. And many add a seventh, eighth, and ninth: the man must ask her out, he must pay, and he must risk rejection by initiating the first kiss, being the first to hold hands, and so on. (If he doesn’t risk kissing her, she is likely not to kiss him.) Men are socialized to want sex as long as only one condition is fulfilled — physical attraction. — P.13

Not many a man ever expects an attractive and successful woman to whom he feels intellectually and emotionally connected to ask him out the first time, pay for him, and keep making advances until he responds. Many women expect these conditions, which are beyond the limits of men’s fantasy lives. A man often feels subconsciously that a woman’s minimum requirements are greater than his wildest fantasy. — P.13

In real life, Linda Evans exclaims that for the right man she’d “quit acting and stay home all the time.” Which was, in fact, what she did. Career by option and wealth by marriage. Which would have made her the fantasy of millions of women who would like to have it all — including softness — by marrying a man who has it all but has become hard in the process of earning it. …The fantasy is marrying in a minute what he earns in a lifetime. — P.36

When women are at the height of their beauty power and exercise it, we call it marriage. When men are at the height of their success and power and exercise it, we call it a midlife crisis. — P.103

Dr. Donald Symons found that, cross culturally, men judge women primarily for attractiveness while women find men attractive only if social, economic, and political status criteria as well as looks are met. Women, he found, often perceive a “man shortage” much larger than is warranted statistically — because far fewer men meet their greater number of demands. — P.104

He and she become selective at different points; she can be selective when he wants his primary fantasy — sex; he can be selective when she wants her primary fantasy — commitment. — P.105

Both sexes work on their “lines” before they appear onstage. His lines are a lifetime of work; her introductory “line” is her appearance — or her lack of lines. Just as careers give men power, so beauty gives women power. But just as the comparison between herself and the most beautiful women makes a woman feel powerless, so the comparison between himself and the most successful men makes a man feel powerless. — P.106

Why did he want a black Porsche? Because he never saw an ugly woman get out of one. — P.106

Exactly what makes the beautiful girl/woman image so much more powerful than other products that are also advertised? Other products, like cars or beer, occupy only a tiny portion of our subliminal seduction; the beautiful woman exists wherever a woman is pictured. Why? Because the marketing researcher knows the male does not feel worthy of her. And if the marketing researcher can make the man feel that buying the product will give him hope of being worthy of her, he will buy the product. — P.111

Male Message 1 is subconsciously experienced by the boy like this: “Some girls in my class already look like movie stars. If they wanted me as much as I want them, then I’d know I was okay. They are genetic celebrities. I am a genetic groupie. — P.111

How does a boy learn to bridge the gap between the genetic celebrity’s power and his feelings of powerlessness? To make him feel less like a puppy dog begging for a morsel? He learns Male Message 2: “I must do something — perform — to earn my way to equality with the genetic celebrity’s first natural resource — her attention. I must defend against the genetic celebrity’s rejection by performing to attract her respect. — P.112

Girls are also desirous of male attention and feel they have to earn it by being attractive enough. Most girls do not feel they are attractive enough to get easily the boys they want for what they want them for. The more attractive a girl is, the higher she sets her sights. For her, there’s also a gap. She feels her other options — like becoming student-body president — will not have the same impact on her as a boy. — P.115

Like the average girl, the beautiful girl, or genetic celebrity, also has her own experience of powerlessness. “This guy keeps pestering me,” she may complain. “He follows me to my locker, waits for me after school, asks me out, makes comments about me to his friends…I wish he’d drop in a ten-foot hole.” She experiences this as harassment if she’s not interested. The average boy looks at this harassment, sees it as attention he would have to work all his life to get. For him, this is just the price of being a genetic celebrity. Her complaints sound to him like the complaints of a Princess Diana. — P.116

In another socioeconomic class, men who drop out of officer training also find the women who love them dropping out of their lives. I live near Camp Pendleton, one of the largest military bases in the United States, just north of San Diego. One man after another has told me that there is “no way personality is as important to a lady as my rank.” — P.133

Once a man has raised his consciousness, he slowly understands that Alan Alda is loved not because he’s sensitive, but because he’s successful and sensitive. — P.134

Think of how often we read of men throwing themselves into cold rivers or hot fires to rescue a woman. We hear of women performing heroics for the sake of a child — but try to recall one example of a woman doing that for a man, even her husband. — P.135

Why are men so afraid of commitment? Chapter 2 explained how most men’s primary fantasy is still, unfortunately, access to a number of beautiful women. For a man, commitment means giving up this fantasy. Most women’s primary fantasy is a relationship with one man who either provides economic security or is on his way to doing so (he has “potential”). For a woman, commitment to this type of man means achieving this fantasy. So commitment often means that a woman achieves her primary fantasy, while a man gives his up. — P.150

Men who “won’t commit” are often condemned for treating women as objects — hopping from one beautiful woman to the next. Many men hop. But the hopping is not necessarily objectifying. Men who “hop from one beautiful woman to another” are usually looking for what they could not find at the last hop: good communication, shared values, good chemistry. — P.153

The meaning of commitment changed for men between the mid-sixties and the mid-eighties. Commitment used to be the certain route to sex and love, and to someone to care for the children and the house and fulfill the “family man image.” Now men feel less as if they need to marry for sex; they are more aware that housework can be hired out and that restaurants serve meals; they are less trapped by family-man image motivation, including the feeling that they must have children. Increasingly, that leaves men’s main reason to commit the hope of a woman to love. — P.159

As some women began to see their fantasy of better homes and gardens as drudgery (Cleaner homes and housework), they made shifts in their fantasy. But they expected men to pursue the remaining housework and child care as if it were part of men’s fantasy. It was presented to men not as a fantasy, though, but as “you’d better do it or you’re a chauvinist.” Men became fearful of committing to a fantasy that was never theirs. — P.164

Devotion in exchange for financial support disappears when financial support disappears. How can a man sense whether a woman will react that way? A hint comes in a survey of women married to doctors published in Medical/Mrs., which indicates that the doctors’ wives, by their own evaluation, wanted security from marriage more than anything else. According to Colette Dowling in The Cinderella Complex, “The conflict and hostility they exhibited toward the men who provide them with all this security is stunning to behold,” yet many of these wives were considered devoted. — P.182

Twenty years ago, a father was barred from most delivery rooms. Now he is expected. A family man was basically an absentee father. Today a family man is expected to be a working father. Twenty years ago, millions of married women didn’t think beyond “giving a man sex.” Today sex is also for women. Twenty years ago a woman may not have known what an orgasm was. Today she expects multiple orgasms, simultaneous orgasms, sensitivity, and sensuality. Expectations have changed. And in the process, yesterday’s bonus can become today’s disappointment. — P.185

Women are often killed in horror movies. Why horror movies? Because the very purpose of the horror is to break taboos — that is what creates horror. Killing a woman is taboo. Killing a man is not. In westerns and war films men are killed left and right, yet they are not called horror films. — P.227

In short, he gets sex and she gets sex. If that is considered unequal, we can see why men are afraid of commitment. — P.240

If a man has sex with too many women without the apparent intention of committing, he, like Ted Kennedy, is seen as a “womanizer” and an “exploiter of women.” Why? Doesn’t each woman agree to have sex with him? Or is it assumed she is being used because she gets nothing more than sex? –P.250

Most men do back off when women initiate. Just as women back off when men initiate. The more a person initiates, the more rejection she or he will get — and the more likely he or she is to get his or her ideal partner. People who initiate are selecting people they want, not necessarily people who have an interest in them. So they get rejected. It is not always because the man cannot handle a woman initiating. Most men, if interested, love it. — P.253

“He asked me out, therefore he pays” is just a double jeopardy of the male role: he must not only do the asking, he must pay. It’s two conditions he must fulfill to be equal to her company. — P.277

Don Juans are often quite sensitive to women — not to what women say they want, but to what their experience with women has taught them women respond to. — P.279

Like parents, mentors are often not only not appreciated but even rebelled against. — P.291

When we hear the phrase “the battle of the sexes,” there is an unspoken assumption that both sexes have been blaming equally. The battle, though, could easily be called, “The female attack on men” not “the male attack on women.” There is a distinction between responding to blame and initiating it. Men have changed less, but they have also blamed less. — P.308

If you think he is changeable, the big problem arises: Creating the change without sacrificing the romance. If only one of you is changing, you become the therapist. Therapists who sleep with their clients take grave risks. — P.316

In an experimental setting, the Condreys asked observers to comment on the feelings expressed by a nine-month-old infant. If the observers were told the infant was a boy, they labeled the crying “anger.” If they were told it was a girl, they labeled the exact same crying by the same child at the time “fear.” — P.334

Men have learned to feel okay about getting the “intimacy” of feeling needed by a woman who is financially deprived; in contrast women have received a conflicting message in their attitude toward men: they want men to need them yet feel neediness is unmanly. They “turn off” to a man they feel they must “mother” — so only a little leeway is allowed between his showing neediness and being “too needy.” — P.359

0
  • Waterwillows

    While it is interesting and somewhat humorous, the author does not really address the issue that people who treat the opposite gender as some kind of sampling of the smorgasbord, not only lack character, but usually are unfit for the mature inter-action of marriage.
    Men and women are ‘hard-wired’ differently. Women desire and appreciate security pretty much with the same intensity as men desire and appreciate sex. Both need to work on the inherent pitfalls that can arise from these drives. If you really think about it, both these drives are complimentary and necessary. We need more knowledge about how to compliment each one with the other.

  • President Friedman

    Men and women have both inherited (from culture, from dysfunctional families, from refusal to grow up) unrealistic and unhealthy expectations about relationships with the opposite sex. Women want men to be something they are often incapable of being, and men think they want and deserve porn stars with hearts of gold, regardless of the man’s resources, skills, and social standing (I find it very interesting, and a very apt sign of the times, that modern Pick Up Artist culture teaches men to imitate the social by-products of success, rather than the actual skills that make one successful). Both sides have to re-evaluate what they are looking for (and what it’s worth to them) if marriage and family are going to survive in our society. The fact that a man has money (or the qualities of someone who may attract money) is not necessarily a good indicator that he will be a good father, and the fact that a woman is hot is no good indicator that she will be a faithful mother, and neither attribute is something that makes a good partner in life. That’s not to say they aren’t important things, or that they haven’t always been important things, but the problem today is that they tend to be the primary thing that gets considered, with the result being that women AND men overlook plenty of good prospects simply because they fail to meet these criteria.

    • Anonymous

      You make a valid point about pick-up culture, prez. I think so many people now play the dating meta game that they forget how to form real relationships. Look at any dating blog or virtually any other pop culture reference, and dating is broken down into a choreographed checklist that in the end really addresses neither partner’s actual needs.

      The result is women with impossible standards or who can’t be happy even in a good relationship, and men that don’t want to be bothered to play the game (or even begin to provide for the needs of a woman) and retreat into drugs and p*rn. I know a lot of people my age and younger that fall into those categories by gender.

      • President Friedman

        Baoxian, one of my opinions is that people are starting too late, as well. From what I’ve seen, it looks to be so much harder to build a personal and professional life for yourself, and then make room for a wife and family. Checking accounts are a good example… almost everyone I know who gets married after 30 has seperate checking accounts, and it *always* becomes an issue. My wife and I, who married relatively young, had a joint checking account from the beginning… not because we were so committed to joining our lives together but because we needed all our income to be in the same pot in order to just pay the bills. So as our incomes evolved, our ability to share and manage our finances evolved with it. It would be incredibly hard to just suddenly start doing that. Likewise, our career and lifestyle decisions have always been made with an eye towards what is best for our family… to suddenly have to start making those kinds of decisions after a decade of only being concerned with what is best for the individual… I can see why people wouldn’t want to bother!

        Part of the problem is that by encouraging people to continually put off marriage and family until later, we are also encouraging them to put off the more onerous responsibilities of adulthood. And then we act surprised when we end up with a nation full of grown up children.

        • Anonymous

          I must disagree somewhat. People are trading one stage of life for the other. Many are focusing on the very adult thing of professional attainment. I do not think people are refusing to grow up (for the most part, it depends) as much as they are trying to see how far they can go without the complications of family. Furthermore, people change jobs way more than they did before. It is highly unlikely any in this generation will work 40 years at one company. People are putting off family for other goals.

          I do not disparage people like this, but they cannot complain of the trade-offs. A career-minded man or woman is more than likely putting off family for personal attainment. They just should understand that is the sacrifice and either accept it or change it.

          • President Friedman

            I’d agree if I thought most people were consciously making this decision, but increasingly what I see are people who have just been taught that there is something wrong with getting married before you turn 30. I mean, if you go to school to be a nurse or an engineer or a hotel manager and that’s what you intend to do with your life professionally, these aren’t things that should prevent you from simultaneously pursuing a spouse.

            And I have to agree with you that people are free to make whatever tradeoffs and decisions they want pertaining to work and family life, but it should also be acknowledged that there can be severe societal consequences when the concept of family is treated as a luxury, or even as an often undersireable lifestyle decision, rather than one of the primary functions of society, and yes, even one of the main responsibilities of adulthood. And of course, since family is historically the chief caregiver to the elderly and infirm, there is the question of what ultimtely happens to all these people who decide to forego it. As much as you and I may disagree with “the state” being the answer to that problem, odds are pretty good that more government will be a major consequence.

      • President Friedman

        Baoxian, one of my opinions is that people are starting too late, as well. From what I’ve seen, it looks to be so much harder to build a personal and professional life for yourself, and then make room for a wife and family. Checking accounts are a good example… almost everyone I know who gets married after 30 has seperate checking accounts, and it *always* becomes an issue. My wife and I, who married relatively young, had a joint checking account from the beginning… not because we were so committed to joining our lives together but because we needed all our income to be in the same pot in order to just pay the bills. So as our incomes evolved, our ability to share and manage our finances evolved with it. It would be incredibly hard to just suddenly start doing that. Likewise, our career and lifestyle decisions have always been made with an eye towards what is best for our family… to suddenly have to start making those kinds of decisions after a decade of only being concerned with what is best for the individual… I can see why people wouldn’t want to bother!

        Part of the problem is that by encouraging people to continually put off marriage and family until later, we are also encouraging them to put off the more onerous responsibilities of adulthood. And then we act surprised when we end up with a nation full of grown up children.

    • Anonymous

      You make a valid point about pick-up culture, prez. I think so many people now play the dating meta game that they forget how to form real relationships. Look at any dating blog or virtually any other pop culture reference, and dating is broken down into a choreographed checklist that in the end really addresses neither partner’s actual needs.

      The result is women with impossible standards or who can’t be happy even in a good relationship, and men that don’t want to be bothered to play the game (or even begin to provide for the needs of a woman) and retreat into drugs and p*rn. I know a lot of people my age and younger that fall into those categories by gender.

  • President Friedman

    Men and women have both inherited (from culture, from dysfunctional families, from refusal to grow up) unrealistic and unhealthy expectations about relationships with the opposite sex. Women want men to be something they are often incapable of being, and men think they want and deserve porn stars with hearts of gold, regardless of the man’s resources, skills, and social standing (I find it very interesting, and a very apt sign of the times, that modern Pick Up Artist culture teaches men to imitate the social by-products of success, rather than the actual skills that make one successful). Both sides have to re-evaluate what they are looking for (and what it’s worth to them) if marriage and family are going to survive in our society. The fact that a man has money (or the qualities of someone who may attract money) is not necessarily a good indicator that he will be a good father, and the fact that a woman is hot is no good indicator that she will be a faithful mother, and neither attribute is something that makes a good partner in life. That’s not to say they aren’t important things, or that they haven’t always been important things, but the problem today is that they tend to be the primary thing that gets considered, with the result being that women AND men overlook plenty of good prospects simply because they fail to meet these criteria.

  • President Friedman

    Men and women have both inherited (from culture, from dysfunctional families, from refusal to grow up) unrealistic and unhealthy expectations about relationships with the opposite sex. Women want men to be something they are often incapable of being, and men think they want and deserve porn stars with hearts of gold, regardless of the man’s resources, skills, and social standing (I find it very interesting, and a very apt sign of the times, that modern Pick Up Artist culture teaches men to imitate the social by-products of success, rather than the actual skills that make one successful). Both sides have to re-evaluate what they are looking for (and what it’s worth to them) if marriage and family are going to survive in our society. The fact that a man has money (or the qualities of someone who may attract money) is not necessarily a good indicator that he will be a good father, and the fact that a woman is hot is no good indicator that she will be a faithful mother, and neither attribute is something that makes a good partner in life. That’s not to say they aren’t important things, or that they haven’t always been important things, but the problem today is that they tend to be the primary thing that gets considered, with the result being that women AND men overlook plenty of good prospects simply because they fail to meet these criteria.

  • President Friedman

    Men and women have both inherited (from culture, from dysfunctional families, from refusal to grow up) unrealistic and unhealthy expectations about relationships with the opposite sex. Women want men to be something they are often incapable of being, and men think they want and deserve porn stars with hearts of gold, regardless of the man’s resources, skills, and social standing (I find it very interesting, and a very apt sign of the times, that modern Pick Up Artist culture teaches men to imitate the social by-products of success, rather than the actual skills that make one successful). Both sides have to re-evaluate what they are looking for (and what it’s worth to them) if marriage and family are going to survive in our society. The fact that a man has money (or the qualities of someone who may attract money) is not necessarily a good indicator that he will be a good father, and the fact that a woman is hot is no good indicator that she will be a faithful mother, and neither attribute is something that makes a good partner in life. That’s not to say they aren’t important things, or that they haven’t always been important things, but the problem today is that they tend to be the primary thing that gets considered, with the result being that women AND men overlook plenty of good prospects simply because they fail to meet these criteria.

  • President Friedman

    Men and women have both inherited (from culture, from dysfunctional families, from refusal to grow up) unrealistic and unhealthy expectations about relationships with the opposite sex. Women want men to be something they are often incapable of being, and men think they want and deserve porn stars with hearts of gold, regardless of the man’s resources, skills, and social standing (I find it very interesting, and a very apt sign of the times, that modern Pick Up Artist culture teaches men to imitate the social by-products of success, rather than the actual skills that make one successful). Both sides have to re-evaluate what they are looking for (and what it’s worth to them) if marriage and family are going to survive in our society. The fact that a man has money (or the qualities of someone who may attract money) is not necessarily a good indicator that he will be a good father, and the fact that a woman is hot is no good indicator that she will be a faithful mother, and neither attribute is something that makes a good partner in life. That’s not to say they aren’t important things, or that they haven’t always been important things, but the problem today is that they tend to be the primary thing that gets considered, with the result being that women AND men overlook plenty of good prospects simply because they fail to meet these criteria.

  • Don_cos

    I realize that this is just a sampling, but it seems that the author simply repeats his points over and over again, simply stating the same thing using different phrases. I also didn’t see anything all that surprising. Somewhat humorous but not particularly enlightening.

  • Southern Man

    Nothing new here to readers of this blog.

    • President Friedman

      Was wondering how long it would take this post to attract a Roissy link. Can’t say I’m a fan, but I get it. Might feel differently if I lived in Manhatten. I think that’s another issue that needs more examination: the different ways men and women behave in metro vs. suburban vs. rural environments.

    • President Friedman

      Was wondering how long it would take this post to attract a Roissy link. Can’t say I’m a fan, but I get it. Might feel differently if I lived in Manhatten. I think that’s another issue that needs more examination: the different ways men and women behave in metro vs. suburban vs. rural environments.

  • The cooler dick nixon

    Yawn.

    Scccccnnnnnnnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooozzzzzzzzzzzzzzeeeeeee.

    • Anonymous

      Trrrrrrrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.

    • Anonymous

      Trrrrrrrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.

    • http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

      That reflects all your posts, petey. Thanks for the redundancy.

    • Anonymous

      Flagged for trolling, personal attacks, and sock puppet posting.

      TR

    • Don_cos

      Cooler? As in not so hot!

  • http://www.facebook.com/jayhoffer Justin Hoffer

    And that’s why I’m single, 23 and preparing for a long, single adulthood. I’ve easily transcended what a typical man looks for in a relationship. Looks matter very little to me. I’ve even dated large women despite me being just under 6 feet, only a little bit of fat and muscular (as I used to be a weight lifter and have had trouble reducing my calorie intake). However, finding a woman who has done the same? I don’t think it is physically possible. Every once in a while I check to see what is out there, but so far I’ve come up empty every single time. The only women I’ve met in person who transcend the typical female as described in these quotes have been lesbians.

    When a woman finds out that I’m a penny pincher, that I prefer to go Dutch until I know her better and that I have very little concern for what others think of my appearance unless it is a special occasion, they go running. Sorry that I’m pragmatic and need to save money for school and equipment, because one date sure as hell isn’t more important than that!

    Simply put: it’s a single life for me!

    • President Friedman

      Don’t stop looking. This nation desperately needs responsible adults to be finding eachother and raising kids together. Things can’t get better until this happens with greater frequency, regardless of what the politicians and the economy do. Especially if your primary concern isn’t looks, there is a woman out there for you.

  • Cylarz

    I simply looked for (and ultimately found) a woman who was practical, of good moral character…who didn’t subscribe to any of the popular relationship fantasy-expectations, who didn’t fit (many of) the female stereotypes.

    The quotes were interesting, but I think I’ll pass on the book. It sounds like a bunch of whining, like efforts to generalize entire genders – each of whom accounts for roughly half of the entire human race.

    I am hard-pressed to come up with much of anything that I could say, that would actually apply to every last one of about 3.5 billion people. Waste of time. Not every woman has the same needs, desires, or expectations. (Neither do the men. If us guys are all different, why would we expect all women to fit neatly into a few generalizations?)

    • President Friedman

      That’s one of the tough things about modern men’s issues: there are few things less manly than men whining about not being appreciated enough. Brett McKay over at Art Of Manliness does an excellent job handling these issues, and Christopher Taylor at Word Around The Net does also, on the too rare occasions when he posts about them!
      Roissy and The Spearhead are too whiny, over-the-top, and faux intellectual for me in general, but you can still find some good stuff there, just avoid the comments sections. Another one of my personasl favorite mens-issue sites, for married men, is Athol Kay’s ‘Married Man Sex Life’.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info