Another Example of Backwards Islamic ‘Culture’

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

Another Example of Backwards Islamic ‘Culture’

Written By : Warner Todd Huston

U.S. troops in Afghanistan are having a hard time understanding what is a strange Afghan cultural practice to them. The practice can be summed up in the ages old Afghan phrase, “women are for children, boys are for pleasure.”

Yes, that phrase means what you think it means. It has been well known for a long time that some parts of Afghanistan have an odd sexual practice ensconced in its culture. Men have sex for pleasure with boys often eschewing women. Sometimes these men even claim to be disgusted by the idea of sex for pleasure with a woman. Yet none of these Afghani men think of themselves as homosexual because they don’t “love” their male sex partners. They just love the sex.

This fact had become well known by Americans back in the 1980s when we were assisting the Mujahadeen to fight the Soviets. CIA operatives, social psychologists and cultural experts working with the government and Army personnel learned this strange habit long ago. But now that we are back in force in Afghanistan we are encountering this practice again and it is causing no end of confusion for U.S. forces — especially medical personnel.

According to Fox News, American doctors are trying to teach Afghani men that they are getting sexually transmitted diseases from the anal sex they are having with each other. The docs are telling these men that they must stop the practice.

The problem is, though, that these Afghani men refuse to take the doctor’s advice because they say it is their cultural practice. In fact, they say that the Koran tells them to do this.

The Fox report includes this statement by an Afghani that surely reflects his cultural bias on the issue. The report mentions that the U.S. medical personnel was trying to tell these men that sex with women will keep them from getting these diseases. The Fox News report said, “when it was explained to him what was necessary, he reacted with disgust and asked, ‘How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.’”

So why do I peg this to a backwards Islamic practice? Because the problem here isn’t just a weird interpretation of Islam isolated in one small corner of the earth it is Islam itself that is the problem.

Certainly we don’t necessarily see this homosexual practice in every Islamic culture, though it does exist in larger numbers than one might think. But the root of the problem is wrapped up in what the Afghani man above said about women. “They are unclean,” he told the U.S. doctors. This idea that women are “unclean” is ubiquitous throughout the religion.

This disgusting devaluing of women doesn’t just happen in Afghanistan, though it seems to be especially virulent there. This devaluing of women is rampant throughout the Islamic world. Islam hates its women. Islam beats its women. Islam rapes its women. Islam murders its women. From every corner of the earth Islam is anti-female.

So, it is no surprise that in at least one Islamic culture even having sex with women makes Islamic men sick.

For Islam to come from the 13th century into the 21st Century it must learn to treat its women with respect.

-1

Smithwick

”
For Islam to come from the 13th century into the 21st Century it must learn to treat its women with respect.”

Which is in and of itself specifically forbidden by islam. So I won’t count on them joining the 18th century any time soon.
Realpolitik

This idea that women are “unclean” is ubiquitous throughout the religion.

Much as it is in Christian religions, though not in the teachings of the Christ.
StanInTexas

Much as it is in Christian religions…
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 14:44:07

Care to prove that?
Realpolitik

Care to prove that?
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 14:48:19

Here’s a start. You may continue on with your lessens at will. There is a lot to read.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/lfe_bibl.htm
StanInTexas

Here’s a start. You may continue on with your lessens at will. There is a lot to read.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/lfe_bibl.htm
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:03:24

None of which says that women are unclean all the time. More of your lies, I see.

Typical RP. Slams religion, then lectures us on tolerance.
Realpolitik

Poor stan, so afraid of the truth. “Ye have eyes, yet ye see not.”
StanInTexas

Poor stan, so afraid of the truth. “Ye have eyes, yet ye see not.”
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:14:08

So let me make sure I have this…
(1)You make a claim about Christianity and women that is a baldface LIE!
(2)I ask you for proof.
(3)You provide a link to a page on religious tolerance and women that does not prove what you claimed.
(4)I call you on your duplicity.
(5)You claim that I am “afraid of the truth”.

That pretty much says it all, RP. You are dismissed.
Realpolitik

So let me make sure I have this…
(1)You make a claim about Christianity and women that is a baldface LIE!
(2)I ask you for proof.
(3)You provide a link to a page on religious tolerance and women that does not prove what you claimed.
(4)I call you on your duplicity.
(5)You claim that I am “afraid of the truth”.

That pretty much says it all, RP. You are dismissed.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:17:55

(1)Nope
(2)Yup
(3)Nope
(4)Nope
(5)Yup

Oh, stan, stan – as if you could dismiss me. lol
StanInTexas

Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:23:31

Still waiting for you to prove your claim, RP.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Much as it is in Christian religions, though not in the teachings of the Christ.

Do you know why they’re called “the Christian religions?” Can’t have Christianity without Christ. You fail again, moron.
Realpolitik

Still waiting for you to prove your claim, RP.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:30:12

You’re an odd li’l man, stan.Proof arrayed before you like a banquet at a wedding.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Here’s a start.

What’s really funny is that the only actual Bible quote on the page (that I saw) was “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Huh. So much for your “Christianity is anti-women” lie.
StanInTexas

You’re an odd li’l man, stan.Proof arrayed before you like a banquet at a wedding.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:33:36

Lets recap.

You claim that “This idea that women are “unclean” is ubiquitous throughout the religion(Islam). Much as it is in Christian religions,”

I asked for proof.

You provided a webpage that contained NOTHING even approaching what you claimed.

I am STILL waiting on your proof. Until then, we’ll just add it to the growing lies of RP.
Realpolitik

Can’t have Christianity without Christ. You fail again, moron.
Posted by CavalierX
2010-01-29 15:31:31

This shows how little you know about the teachings of the Christ. And the tenets espoused by so many ‘Christian’ religions.

And – as I am curious about this – do you think anyone believes you when you claim someone has failed? And are your childish insults ever effective?
StanInTexas

And are your childish insults ever effective?
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:38:50

“You’re an odd li’l man, stan.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:33:36”

What were you saying again about “childish insults”, RP?
Realpolitik

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:37:20

Excuse such a personal question, stan, but why are you waiting for something which has already happened?
StanInTexas

Excuse such a personal question, stan, but why are you waiting for something which has already happened?
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:44:28

I’m waiting on you to prove your claim, not simply posta random page about women and religious tolerance.

You have not provided proof that Christianity considers women unclean at all times.

Your dancing and spinning is further proof that you lie.
Rappin’

RP, ubiquitous throughout? Thanks for the lessen.
Realpolitik

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:47:00

So, stan, you do wait for something that has already happened. A waste of time, that.
StanInTexas

So, stan, you do wait for something that has already happened. A waste of time, that.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:51:18

Then perhaps you can provide for me a single quote from the site you provided that proves a tenet of Christianity is that women are unclean all the time.

I’ll wait.
Realpolitik

What were you saying again about “childish insults”, RP?
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:43:31

I’m saying that calling someone a moron is a childish insult. Maintaining your obtuse opinions in face of proof to the contrary makes you (and this is actually kind) an odd l’il man.
Realpolitik

I’ll wait.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 15:55:22

Happily, it’s your life to waste – not mine.
StanInTexas

I’m saying that calling someone a moron is a childish insult. Maintaining your obtuse opinions in face of proof to the contrary makes you (and this is actually kind) an odd l’il man.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:56:41

And your statement would have merit IF AND ONLY IF you had actually proven your claim.

You haven’t. I’m still waiting for that passage.
StanInTexas

Happily, it’s your life to waste – not mine.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 15:58:37

Thank you, RP.

Anyone with a positive IQ score knew your statement was a lie from the moment you typed it. You inability to even come close to proving your claim adds additional clarity.

Your admission that you lied is accepted.
Realpolitik

Your admission that you lied is accepted.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 16:01:05

That’s another of your oddities, stan. Claiming as fact something you made up.
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

And – as I am curious about this – do you think anyone believes you when you claim someone has failed?

Oh, it was pretty obvious to everyone but you. I was just letting you know it was past time to stop making as ass of yourself. My kindness is almost always wasted on you Liberals. However, I see you’re desperately trying to dodge the point: that you can’t talk about Christianity without including Christ.
StanInTexas

Claiming as fact something you made up.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 16:15:07

Time for you to move on, little bitch. You’ve lost another one. Continuing to gyrate makes Cav’s assessment of you look more correct than ever.
Realpolitik

Oh, it was pretty obvious to everyone but you. I was just letting you know it was past time to stop making as ass of yourself. My kindness is almost always wasted on you Liberals. However, I see you’re desperately trying to dodge the point: that you can’t talk about Christianity without including Christ.
Posted by CavalierX
2010-01-29 16:23:56

Well, if it was so obvious, there was no need to make the point. So, it was not obvious – just empty by your own standards (low though they be).

Now, there is no dodging going on by me. You make statements which are not true (seems to be a theme here this afternoon).
Realpolitik

Time for you to move on, little bitch. You’ve lost another one. Continuing to gyrate makes Cav’s assessment of you look more correct than ever.
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 16:24:18

Poor stan – defeated again. You resort to a tawdry and tired insult, and make a statement which is not true. You see – you are an odd l’il man.
StanInTexas

Poor stan – defeated again. You resort to a tawdry and tired insult, and make a statement which is not true. You see – you are an odd l’il man.
Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 16:44:51

Blah, Blah, Blah…
Lie, Lie, Lie…

RP, your song remains the same!
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

The Koran mentions that paradise includes young virgin boys as well as girls, should that be your thing.
Realpolitik

your song remains the same!
Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 16:54:56

My song is sweet whilst yours is sour.
Realpolitik

Posted by Christopher_Taylor
2010-01-29 16:54:59

God is indeed Great!
http://Kingfisher Kingfisher

Stan,

The link referred by Reallunatik uses “CE” (Common Era) instead of “AD” (Anno Domini or “The Year of our Lord”). This is a common trait used among intolerant groups to remove any reference to Jesus in our culture. Why follow the examples of a group of people that want any reference of our Lord removed?

The fact that RealDumbass refers to this site shows his hatred of Christianity. Of course, he’ll try to encourage a direct response from me but I’ve disproven his lies so many times in the past.

You won the argument.
http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

The CE/BCE thing is retarded anyway. What happened at that time in history to be before/current? Why, that was when Jesus was active on earth and died. You still haven’t gotten away from Our Lord, you’ve just changed the name out of fear and stupidity.
Realpolitik

You won the argument.
Posted by Kingfisher
2010-01-29 17:26:17

WHEW! The deflection you create ’tis enough to make even the prophets swoon! Way to go, li’l bird. Regroup your forces, face down your fear, and attempt to address the subject at hand, OK?

stan – as you well know – won nothing.
Realpolitik

Posted by Christopher_Taylor
2010-01-29 17:51:59

Since no one knows when the Christ died (and rose again – you oddly omitted this point), designations are moot.

Oh, and a bit of religious tolerance for you. Hope you can do better with it than stan.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/ce.htm
StanInTexas

You won the argument.
Posted by Kingfisher 2010-01-29 17:26:17

Let RP have his pyrric victory, King. It is so lonely in the little world he lives in. Even RP’s imaginary friends thinks he is a prick.

RP, you are only a legend in your own tiny mind.
Realpolitik

Posted by StanInTexas
2010-01-29 18:12:40

This is what you are reduced to, stan. Weak and vapid (and so oft repeated) insults. Because your arguments are futile. You crawl wimpering from the debate, defeated.

Realpolitik ain’t a legend, you odd li’l man. Realpolitik is Legend.
StanInTexas

Posted by Realpolitik 2010-01-29 18:17:56

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

Realpolitik is Legend.

Posted by Realpolitik
2010-01-29 18:17:56

Congrats on the promotion. You at the wifi cafe or the truck stop today? Nixon supposes you are still overweight though.
http://jpbaidu.com/contact/another-example-of-backwards-islamic-culture-right-wing-news/ Another Example of Backwards Islamic 'Culture' | Right Wing News Contact

[...] more: Another Example of Backwards Islamic 'Culture' | Right Wing News Tags: backwards, celebrity-news, masks, nola, right-wing, ruins, street-payday, teachers-union, [...]
http://www.publiusforum.com Warner Todd Huston

… man when you guys all get on a roll, it’s amazing to watch!
RKae

Islam Shmislam! This is not a religion thing. It’s a human thing. Humans (many of them; so many of them that it would sicken you to know the full count) love the feeling of a lopsided power dynamic. They love molesting children for the thrill of being overbearing and frightening. And…

(Here’s the most important thing to know!)

…they will do it with or without religion! No matter WHAT system of cultural governance you have in place, child rapists will rationalize their ghastly actions. You think if you get rid of religion you can get rid of child rape? (Likewise, you think if you get rid of religion you can get rid of mysoginy?)

Good God! That’s stupid!

Religion was created by people, so they created it to facilitate their needs. Put them in a secular or atheistic setting and the child rapists will still say, “You knooooooow… here’s a reasonable explanation why I should be able to mess with kids…” And they’re off to the races with their rationalization. (Pedos are currently in the psychiactric profession working on the idea that “society needs to get over its fear of adult-child sex.” Look into it. It’s happening. They did it for homosexuality and it worked; they’re doing it for pedos now. Cultural acceptance is on the way, and through totally secular, “scientific” discourse!)

Child rapists will speak whatever the language of the day is. Anyone who fails to see this is in for a sick surprise.
http://report.xxoome.com/another-example-of-backwards-islamic-culture-right-wing-news/ Another Example of Backwards Islamic 'Culture' | Right Wing News Report Me

[...] the original: Another Example of Backwards Islamic 'Culture' | Right Wing News tags: cultural, cultural-bias, diplomat-praised, discussed-or-decided, from-getting, [...]
http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

Much as it is in Christian religions, though not in the teachings of the Christ.

Do you know why they're called “the Christian religions?” Can't have Christianity without Christ. You fail again, moron.