For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
New York’s Dede Scozzafava MUST Withdraw
Written By : Warner Todd Huston

In July liberal Republican DeDe Scozzafava was tapped by the 11 Republican county chairmen of New York’s 23rd Congressional District to run for the seat being vacated by John McHugh, who resigned to take Obama’s offer to become Secretary of the Army.

The NY GOP made a huge mistake with this smoke-filled-room choice. Scozzafava has made a hash of this campaign and should withdraw her candidacy immediately and allow Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman to take her place.

Her lousy campaign aside, the prime reason we want to Dump Dede is because she doesn’t seem to be much of a Republican in a District that could elect a Republican candidate (and traditionally has). Scozzafava has all the wrong positions for a Republican. She is an abortion supporter, supports same-sex marriage and her hubby is a bigtime union leader. Even worse, groups associated with the criminal, left-wing organization ACORN have endorsed her candidacy — not the sort of company a Republican should keep.

Her primary opponent is New York Conservative Party Candidate Doug Hoffman who is most certainly far more like a Republican than Dede. Hoffman has picked up the support of several high profile Republicans such as former GOP Sen. Fred Thompson, Campaign for Working Families founder Gary Bauer, and the Washington D.C. based Club for Growth. It also looks like Former Congressman Dick Armey is coming out for Hoffman, too.

Hoffman is a small government supporter he is against raising taxes and opposes both the stimulus and Obamacare. Hoffman’s message suits the mood of a tea party going nation that is sick of insider politics and big spending liberals.

As I mentioned, Scozzafava is proving an inept candidate. One of the absurd incidents of this campaign happened this week when Dede’s Hubby called the cops on a correspondent from the conservative magazine Weekly Standard. Apparently the candidate did not appreciate writer John McCormack’s questions and decided that his efforts to get the candidate to answer them constituted “harassment.”

The Scozzafavas claimed that McCormack “repeatedly screamed questions” and carried on in a manner “that would make the National Enquirer blush.” Of course, audio of the incident shows that McCormack was only speaking at a level loud enough to be heard and otherwise carried himself in a professional manner. The police even said that the incident was overblown.

“I don’t believe it ever escalated to anything that would ever be classified as an emergency,” (Lowville Village Police Chief Eric) Fredenburg said.

Strangely, this has become a hill that Newt Gingrich has decided to die on. He insists that only Scozzafava can win in this District and is standing behind his quixotic backing of the liberal Republican.

Gingrich says that he believes Scozzafava when she says that she won’t vote for more taxes and he claims that she came out against Obamacare. But a look at what Scozzafava actually said about Obamacare shows less outright opposition to Obamacare and more calculated dancing around the question. In a recent news report, Scozzafava said:

Any meaningful health care reform must reduce costs by expanding competition across state lines and by implementing much needed tort reform to curb the frivolous lawsuits that have been driving up costs on the entire system.

Where in that artful dodge did Gingrich see actual opposition to Obamacare? As for Hoffman he was unequivocal, saying, “(T)his legislation is not about health care reform. It is simply about loading down the taxpayers with more debt and more costs.”

The main question here is can Hoffman beat the Democrat to win this District? For sure he cannot if Scozzafava stays in the race (and she can’t win if Hoffman does). Still even Washington Post writer Chris Cillizza — NO Republican supporter he — thinks Hoffman can win.

Ominously for a GOP win, Scozzafava has already faded to third place in the polls despite being the official GOP nominee and she is out of steam in fund raising while Hoffman has surged with his.

Lastly, I’d like to comment on the selection process by which New York Republicans pick their candidates. We are in a day when few people of any political ideology trust those in power and party loyalty is at an all time low. To regain the confidence of the people the GOP should be initiating a process of getting back to the people and trusting the rank and file to become an integral part of the party. Yet the NY GOP goes behind closed doors and chooses the candidates for the voters? This smacks of cronyism and the good ol’ boy network. To essentially tell the voters, as this selection process does, that their opinion isn’t wanted is precisely the wrong message to send.

Today I join a whole retinue of conservative bloggers and writers to say let the voters choose. Dump DeDe. Vote Doug Hoffman.

0
  • http://guardian.blogdrive.com/ CavalierX

    Geez, don't you know you are supposed to automatically vote for whomever has the (R) after his or her name regardless of the candidate's actual issue positions? What are you, some kind of crazed Right-wing radical?

    /sarc

  • http://www.publiusforum.com Warner Todd Huston

    LOL. I know, right?

  • whats_up

    I guess my question is why MUST she withdraw, doesnt she have a right to run for office? Dont voters have a right to vote for her?

  • BIG

    Of course she has every right to run as long as she meets the minimun qualifications for a Representative. She has just as much a right to run as David Patterson has for Governor.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    I think if you re-read the article carefully you'll find that Mr. Huston isn't saying she shouldn't be allowed to run at all, only that she shouldn't be allowed to run as a Republican.

    Big difference there, my friend.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    I think if you re-read the article carefully

    Heh. Whats_up reading an article carefully. That's a good one, Martin.

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    Hey, you can always HOPE he'll CHANGE.

  • whats_up

    I think if you re-read the article carefully you'll find that Mr. Huston isn't saying she shouldn't be allowed to run at all, only that she shouldn't be allowed to run as a Republican.

    Big difference there, my friend.

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-10-22 14:35:48

    Why not Martin? Why cant she run as a Republican? You act as if there is a litmus test to run as a Republican or for that matter a Democrat.

  • whats_up

    I think if you re-read the article carefully you'll find that Mr. Huston isn't saying she shouldn't be allowed to run at all, only that she shouldn't be allowed to run as a Republican.

    Big difference there, my friend.

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-10-22 14:35:48

    Actually Martin that is not what he said:

    Scozzafava has made a hash of this campaign and should withdraw her candidacy immediately and allow Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman to take her place.

    No where did he sayd that she should stay in the race, Mr. Huston actually said that she should withdraw, not change party affliation, not drop Republican, he said that she should withdraw from the campaign period.

  • BIG

    He said she should withdraw. That implies that it is her choice to run. No where has a big hand come from the sky and told her that she can't run. Now back to Governor Patterson and the White House telling him not to run. Do you see the difference or are you elevating Warner to the same level as President Obama in his political influence?

  • http://www.publiusforum.com Warner Todd Huston

    Guys… if you can find somewhere in my piece where I said this person or that person was not ALLOWED to run… well, then I can apologizes for the bad writing. Fact is, tho, I never said who wasn't allowed to run. I want her to drop out but I never said she somehow wasn't allowed to stay in!

    By the way wahts_up, you wonder why the voters shouldn't have a "right" to vote for her. They weren't given that "right" in her choice in the FIRST place! The state GOP chose her FOR the voters, not the other way around.

  • whats_up

    By the way wahts_up, you wonder why the voters shouldn't have a "right" to vote for her. They weren't given that "right" in her choice in the FIRST place! The state GOP chose her FOR the voters, not the other way around.

    Posted by Warner Todd Huston

    2009-10-22 15:43:54

    Mr. Huston have you looked into New York law? Is the Republican party allowed to have a primary before a special election or does there have to be one candidate? I dont know, however in some states this is what happens. If the voters dont like her, they wont vote for her. If your conservative position is so strong why does it matter that she is in the race?

  • http://conservativebootcamp.com martinhale

    No where did he sayd that she should stay in the race, Mr. Huston actually said that she should withdraw, not change party affliation, not drop Republican, he said that she should withdraw from the campaign period.

    Let's step back here for a moment. Firstly, Mr. Huston's piece is an opinion piece, not factual expository writing to be submitted to a court for review, nor is it a scholarly document. It's an opinion piece on an opinion blog. Take it for what it is. Secondly, I don't think that any author is under any obligation to affirmatively state every possible nuance or outcome of the situation they're describing. If they are, then the face of writing is going to change for the worse rather rapidly as books, magazines and web articles begin to resemble legal briefs. Thirdly, the part about her having the freedom to mount a campaign under a different banner really rests on readers having some acquaintanceship with how politics works in this country – you know – common sense and common knowledge. But according to you, writers now need to state all of the societal assumptions and background material in order to not offend the sensibilities of nit-pickers such as you. Fourthly, you're complaining not about something Mr. Huston said, but rather about something he didn't say, which is really, really petty.

    But, I'll tell you what – if you can show me where in the article Mr. Huston makes an affirmative statement that Ms. Scozzafava is such an evil/bad/scurrilous person that she shouldn't be allowed to run at all under any circumstances for any party, we'll be able to agree on this matter. But, if you can't find that affirmative statement in the article, then it's obvious that you're basing your whole distraction argument on your interpretation of what Mr. Huston didn't write, which is a very weak position from which to argue.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    If your conservative position is so strong why does it matter that she is in the race?

    Posted by whats_up

    2009-10-22 15:46:47

    Typical liberal. Anti free speech.

  • whats_up

    Posted by BIG

    2009-10-22 15:36:36

    Patterson denied that the white house told him that, but of course you will now claim that he is lying.

  • whats_up

    Fourthly, you're complaining not about something Mr. Huston said, but rather about something he didn't say, which is really, really petty.

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-10-22 16:16:24

    Actually Marin i was commenting on your observations of what Mr. Huston wrote, you were the one that stated this:

    I think if you re-read the article carefully you'll find that Mr. Huston isn't saying she shouldn't be allowed to run at all, only that she shouldn't be allowed to run as a Republican.

    Big difference there, my friend.

    Posted by martinhale

    2009-10-22 14:35:48

    That is what we are commenting on, your observations, which imho are incorrect according to what Mr. Huston wrote.

  • whats_up

    Ill ask any conservative here why Ms. Scozzafa should get out of the race, again if your conservative points are so strong what does it matter if she runs as a Republican or not, after all the "conservative" candidate is in the race remember, so it shouldnt matter who else runs against him.

  • Mike_M

    Well if the resident lefties are concerned about keeping her in the race, she must be a stinkbomb. Her days appear to be numbered anyways if she's polling third and nearly broke. Too bad it looks like Newt is going to throw away his credibility for 2010 by endorsing somebody alongside ACORN, Kos, and the NY Teacher's Union.

  • TheBaud

    Posted by whats_up 2009-10-22 16:24:03

    Whats_up, you are a liar and a partisan Liberal. Why should anyone care in the least what you think about a Republican race?

    So shut up and go back to figuring out how you will lie to get to vote in the Republican primary. No one here care what you think about this!

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    I'm less concerned in her running (although clearly she's no Republican) than I am in getting the leadership in the GOP to understand they're supposed to be a distinct difference from the Democrats. People want an alternative, two choices, not two people who're basically the same with different logos.

  • http://TheNixonTape.Blogspot.Com Dick_Nixon

    Palin has entered the fray and endorsed Hoffman. Basically, she just kicked Gingrich and the RINO's in the NY party in the nuts. Hard. With heels.

  • D-Vega

    You have to understand that Sarah Palin's opinion don't mean that much in NY.

    Either non-Dem candidate could win. This is the old game of split the vote. That is why both of them trail the Dem.

    Neither should have to pull out. But that means the Dem wins.

  • whats_up

    Posted by TheBaud

    2009-10-22 16:31:32

    I see that you couldnt answer the question Baud, it was real easy, if conservatism and its views are so strong then why does it matter who runs against Mr. Hoffman, interesting that you cant answer that, but then again when dealing with children that is to be expected.

  • TheBaud

    I see that you couldnt answer the question Baud, it was real easy, if conservatism and its views are so strong then why does it matter who runs against Mr. Hoffman, interesting that you cant answer that, but then again when dealing with children that is to be expected.

    Posted by whats_up 2009-10-23 11:48:12

    You really expect people here to take you serious when you partisan Liberal like you lectures us on Conservative ideals? Please! You have no interest in anything other than being a jerk. Your question was as stupid as you are and deserves the following response…

    hahahahahahahahahaha!

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    You have to understand that Sarah Palin's opinion don't mean that much in NY.

    The people who don't like Sarah Palin aren't voting Republican in the primaries, Vega. Stop conflating "me and all my buddies" with "everyone." Its a pretty common and serious mistake.

  • D-Vega

    What primaries, CT?

    There is only the election now.

Advertisement
Featured Video

This Rush Babe is…*gasp* Black!

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time
50 Things Every 18-Year-Old Should Know
Politically Correct Fairy Tales
Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married
Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies
The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web
Advertisement
User Info