That’s One Palinriffic Fence!

For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com

Premium Left blogad

Left Blog Ad

Permalinks

That’s One Palinriffic Fence!

Written By : John Hawkins

Yesterday at Right Wing News, I wrote the following about the stalker/journalist who moved in next to Sarah Palin,

Here’s a thought: Build a fence taller than the rented house, knock it out in a week, and then hold a press conference in front of it asking why the federal government can’t do the same thing on the border? Not only would that be genius; it would be a very Palin thing to do. Keep giving the bast@rds Hell, Sarah!

Well folks, ask and ye shall receive. Take a look at the border between the Palins and the stalkerazzi next door as of today,

Sarah Palin Fence

As Michelle Malkin said,

I nominate Todd Palin for border czar. If only our federal government acted as swiftly and decisively to protect the nation’s borders from intrusion…

Speaking of Michelle Malkin, remember when the Left was calling her a stalker? She actually drove out to the commercial property of a family being used as spokesmen by the Democrats and talked to someone there for a story — you know, the sort of thing reporters do every day a week that they’re not turning Democratic press releases into articles. Now, some liberal weirdo moves to Alaska, next door to Sarah Palin, and liberals are defending it. * Jimmy Swaggart couldn’t match the average liberal in the hypocrisy department…

Correction: Originally, I said Jerry Falwell, not Jimmy Swaggart. Although I’m not the biggest fan of the good reverend, he’s not whom I intended to take a shot at there. My apologies for the careless error.

Steven

Jerry Falwell a hypocrite? No wonder the left defeats us consistently; we shoot our own.

StanW

Perhaps he meant Jimmy Swaggart, hypocrite extrodinaire! Not sure how he can make the case about Falwell.

But to the main point… Liberals as HYPOCRITES? Who Knew! ;)

whats_up

Kind of like conservatives, but we did know that.

StanW

Ah, the dreaded “You guys do it, too!” excuse.

Typical!
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Or like NOT, but then you but just had to project, AGAIN!

http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C2UYYYSPBB7S3NC3NQ7NOJFLME Peter

Whenever you point a finger at liberals there are four other fingers pointing back at you. You're calling liberals hypocrites is as hypocritical as it gets. :)

StanW

Four to one? I'll take that challenge, Peter/Zimmy.Jack_Schite. Give me four examples of Conservative hypocrisy for every example of Liberal hypocrisy?

Little early in the morning to be high, isn't it?
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bark Bark, Moonbat!
FreedomLover

What planet are YOU from? When I point, there are only THREE fingers pointing back. This is because, like most human beings, I have four fingers and a thumb. And by the way, even the thumb doesn't point back at me.

Then again, the very nature of your statement, one of deflection and redirection, is a very liberal/left-wing/progressive thing to do.
earlgrey133

That makes no sense. If I accuse some one of running a red light, than do I then accuse myself of doing the same thing? What?? Basically you are saying you don't want anyone to make any judgements about anyone.

The everyone else does it argument so why judge xyz argument was never valid and its grown tiresome.
Mr. EMT

Thanks for pointing out we have more fingers to point that are just going to waste.

baoxian

Well that was classy of the Palins. I would have mounted a webcam on my house, pointed it at his, and broadcast the stream live 24/7.

Arthur

Most likely there would be some civil if not criminal lawsuits there. Wouldn't get her any voters either, in fact would lose voters

http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C2UYYYSPBB7S3NC3NQ7NOJFLME Peter

Here's a thought. Don't follow leaders watch your parking meters.

Palin obviously has to dumb issues down to your level.

With no skin in the game and a yearning to make lots of money as a media celeb, who gives a flying hooey what she thinks.

StanW

The stalker-”writer” that move in next door to her obviously does. And you do, as you continue to post on topics about here. Some might even call that HYPOCRISY, Peter/Zimmy/Jack_Schite!
http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

“who gives a flying hooey what she thinks”

How come whenever her name is mentioned, Liberals come a-swarming to scream at us about how irrelevant and unimportant she is? Damn, it's funny.

D-Vega

Maybe because she manufactures controversies and meaningless beefs with people, and then refuses to actually open herself up to objective critiques and hides behind Facebook. Then the media laps it up, parroting her words without critiquing it or forcing her to explain her ludicrous assertions. Then her minions eat it up and think that she is a constant target, when really no one on the left thinks she is threat to anything they want or are planning.

She's not happy unless she's a victim of someone, somewhere. Even if she is not the one that's mentioned (i.e. retards). You guys constantly whined about how Obama was style and no substance, an “empty suit”. But now he has actually illustrated substance and gotten results. Whereas she has yet to do anything since she's hit the national stage, except lose elections. She is both no style and no substance.

Now, please go on and tell me about how a fear her, just because I ridicule and point out facts about her. Maybe I'm a sexist then, or I fear she can derail some legislation?

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Facts!! Where have suppiled facts, your whole post hyperbole.

D-Vega

What exactly do you need proof of, wolf? What exactly did I say that seems to be unfactual?

mightysamurai

Maybe because she manufactures controversies and meaningless beefs with people

Really? So she “manufactured” this stalker living next door to her? She “manufactured” the frivolous ethics lawsuits filed by Democratic operatives designed to waste her time and money? She “manufactured” the cuckoo liberals who claim her infant son is actually her nephew?
http://networdblog.blogspot.com Christopher_Taylor

Dude, you just agreed she had a valid beef here, what's with the sudden need to kick Palin? I mean other than “she's an attractive, popular, and well-spoken voice of conservatism therefore I must hate her?”

D-Vega

I am just stating the facts, CT. My comment was in direct response to Cavalier.

She does have a valid beef, but then she exploits it to maximize the spotlight, while claiming victimhood.

RWNReader2

“hiding” behind Facebook??? If something as mundane as posting her thoughts on Facebook get you to come here with your panties in a bunch, I can't imagine how much shit you'd be shitting on yourself if she didn't! A woman in Alaska posts on Facebook and a full grown man in New York screems “I'm not afraid of her!!!” Do you realize what a caricature you are?
http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

I can actually smell the hate and fear coming off your comment, D-Vega. If you really thought she was irrelevant and stupid, a loser with “no style and no substance,” you would hardly have a word to say about her… rather like me talking about Paris Hilton. I think I might have made two comments about Hilton in all the years I've been using the internet, and both of them were jokes. Yet here you are, writing volumes about Sarah Palin. Again.

D-Vega

Palin is not Paris Hilton, but close.

And I joked about Hilton many times, because she's funny.

No, no one is scared of her. People do hate her, but I am not one of those people. I dislike her, though. And considering how conservatives fawn over her, it's not inappropriate, fearful or hateful to give my take on it. That's not going to stop.

I don't fear or hate Van Douchebag. But I still make it clear that I think he's a douchebag.

http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Bark Bark, moonbat!

http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/C2UYYYSPBB7S3NC3NQ7NOJFLME Peter

Stroke stroke pizza boy.

Another All-American Troll

Rather, old chap! Give these bloody Yanks what for!
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

Says the jobless one, living in mommies basement!

At least I have a job.

democratsarefascists

The Jerry Falwell comment makes no sense whatsoever, but the picture's priceless.
http://twitter.com/TeachAMan2Fish Scott S.

Too bad it wasn't made of steel, one knocked out knothole later and peeper keeps his hobby. Doberman would help!
D-Vega

Using the term stalker is a bit much, considering stalking is a much more serious issue that can result in assault or murder.

I would consider this harassment, though. As a bottom-feeding tell-all writer doesn't have to do this. I've never been a fan of these people who write hit-pieces in the disguise of actual investigative pieces in the form of a book.

Having said that, that fence pictured above is one of the worst fence-jobs I've ever seen. I would have used hedges.

sim427

Stalker is pretty accurate. He moved across the country to live next door, he films and records everything coming from their house and writes screeds about the evil Palins. I'd call that stalker behavior and I would actually worry about an escalation from this loon.
StanW

Typical Vega, you could not even take a frothing Liberal to task without throwing in a petty and childish shot out at the Palins.

Oh, and the hedge idea is brilliant. Why in 8 or 9 months, they MIGHT have had a little protecting from their new peeper neighbor.

D-Vega

It's not a childish shot, the post is about the fence. And it's a horrible fence. Is that an optical illusion or does the fence actually lift from the ground and create space along the bottom?

Moreover, there are much bigger fences all over the U.S. border. I don't know when you have seen the border. But there's no lack of fences. There is a lack of human enforcement of said fences. The “danged fence” is a symbolic Moby Dick for the right. But anyone who's been to the border knows there are fences everywhere that people simply break through or go over.

StanW

He put it up practically overnight, Vega. And it was designed to keep the salker next door from peering at his family.

Yes, it was a cheap shot, and you obviously meant it as a cheap shot.

And your hedge comment? Mindnumbingly STUPID!

D-Vega

Who said the guy was peering on the family, Stan? Who said that this guy would be looking into an underage girl's bedroom?

Oh, that's right. Sarah Palin did. Because she wants to turn this into something nasty, as if the guy is a pedo. It's pathetic and irresponsible. She's the only person who can capitalize on victimization in such a way.

This guy is an author who wants to sell books.

“No one is stalking anyone,” Joe McGinniss (his son) wrote to (Ben) Smith in an email. “A woman was renting her house and sought out the author because the Palins had crossed her (owed her money for renovations she had done at their request and never paid her for). So she knew McGinniss was writing the book and found him and offered him the house.”

According to McGinniss, the neighbor also “turned down more lucrative offers from the National Enquirer who wanted the house so they could 'stalk' and take pictures, etc… She said no.”
StanW

Yes, Vega, Sarah Palin said that he was peering in on her house. That is based upon the flimsy evidence of her walking outside and seeing him looking at her with binoculars.

And Palin does not need to turn this into something nasty, McGinnis already did that by stalking her.
D-Vega

He was looking at her with binoculars, Stan? Really?

Is that like your bullshit assertion that the majority of Hispanics in AZ support their profiling law?
StanW

Looks like you are right Vega. The binoculars report was not a direct quote from Palin. Here is her quote “I looked up in surprise to see a “new neighbor” overlooking my property just a stone’s throw away. Needless to say, our outdoor adventure ended quickly after Todd went to introduce himself to the stranger who was peering in…“

So he was not using binoculars, and for that I apologize. But he was peering in on her family. Hense the need to put up the fence quickly.
D-Vega

He wasn't peering. He is on his property.

“Peering” makes it seem a bit more sleazy. And of course, that's the point.

This guy is bottom-feeder, I'll admit. But he's not into little girls. He wants to write a hit-piece on Sarah Palin. He is exploiting her, so she is exploiting him.
StanW

Why do you do this, Vega. Speak as if you know something for a fact when in reality you have no idea.

Sarah Palin was there and said he was peering at her and her family. You were not, therefore you do not know. You also do not know that this guy isn't into little girls.

And how is Sarah Palin exploiting the man stalking her and her family? But telling people about it?

http://networdblog.blogspot.com Christopher_Taylor

Yeah that's what I was thinking too, that's a really ugly fence job, is it left off the ground just in case the dog wants out?

lin

Dangerous strategy Mr Hawkins; it makes clear why you are an unconnected political theorist instead of a political operative or strategist that any candidate or party chooses to trust.

First, poll after poll shows that voters are sick of the constant negative campaigning. What you propose is a purely negative campaign. The Tea Party may like that, but the Tea Party is a bunch of mostly a bunch of already-Republican, grumpy, middle class white folks. They bring nothing to the table other than adoration of Sarah Palin, who has not uttered an original thought since McCain picked her for VP.

The other danger is that the strategy may back fire. By election day, if the economy is clearly in a recovery (the signs of which are already apparent) – if the federal government continues to profit on investments in banks it bailed out – if ordinary people (e.g., people able to get health insurance despite preexisting conditions) start benefiting from ObamaCare – all the negative campaigning will look like sour grapes whining from politicians who lost a legislative fight.

Now if conservatives campaigned on what they have to offer, instead of what they are against ……… but the Tea Party would never support that, now would they?

mightysamurai

poll after poll shows that voters are sick of the constant negative campaigning

Yes, I agree. Poll after poll shows that voters are sick of the Democrats' constant negative campaigning.
http://www.patriotpost.com bthewolf

If you knew anything about what the Tea Party you'd know more Dems are signed up than Reps, that represent al arge cross section of the American public, and they just want an end to outrageous and unsustainable govt spending. Apparently all you know about us is what DKos and HuffPo have spoon fed you.

And don't get to hopeful about the economy the housing bubble is still contracting, jobless rate is not dropping, and Obamacare doesn't kick in until 2014!!!

lin

PS – Swaggart and Bakker might have been better examples, but naming Falwell was not wrong. Falwell, like Robertson, Dobson ans many other right-wing “christians' advocated for military action ( i.e., kill lots of foreigners because we do not like their politics or religion), and, under the guise of “free market” economics, advocated for unrestrained greed. America is a better and more Christian place because Falwell – a colossal hypocrite – is dead.

StanW

Lin, you will be shocked to hear this, but there is nothing un-Christian about military action or war. Had you even the slightest hint about the contents of the Bible, you would know this. And I am unsure of where you got this “advocated for unrestrained greed” line, so you will have to explain.

Your anti-Christian hatred and ignorance are noted.
mightysamurai

Flagged for offensive trolling.

Power_System_Oper

I would hind behind a tall fence too after my “drill baby drill” rant boomeranged into “How's that willy-nilly drilly working for you now Sarah.” taunt.
juanel webb

please do not pick on jimmy swaggart. he is preaching the gospel of
Jesus Christ…..the Cross…..yes he stumbled but years ago and he
repented…..now Jerry Falwell is a whole different situation….but he
is deceased…..you should not have “popped off” regarding either one
of these men unless perhaps you have achieved that status called
“perfection” which you have not.

If I Was Your President (Boyfriend Spoof)

Premium Right Ads

Blogads Right

Previous Features

40 Of The Most Bad-Ass, Masculine, Manly, Alpha Male Quotes Of All Time

Why Men Are Becoming Wimpy, Video Game Playing Slackers Who Don’t Want To Get Married

Horror You Will Never Get Out Of Your Brain Again: Bronies

The 10 Best Obama Ate A Dog Images From Around The Web

User Info

Features

Archives Best of RWN Humor John Hawkins Interviews Quotes Special to RWN