For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Will Super Tuesday See Romney Rise And Not-Romney’s Drop Out?
Written By : William Teach

Will Romney win big? Will Santorum win big? Will Newt win Georgia? Will Ron Paul win the militia vote and still be irrelevant? Will any contenders drop out? Questions to be answered by the end of the day

(Daily Caller) It’s Super Tuesday, which means today is the busiest day yet of the 2012 Republican race for president with 419 delegates up for grabs in 10 states across the country.

A Romney victory over Santorum in Ohio would contribute to the growing notion that the former Massachusetts governor is becoming the inevitable nominee. His advisers are exuding confidence that Tuesday will be a good day.

Depends on the margin of victory.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is counting on a must-win in the Peach State, whose 76 delegates are the most at stake of all the states, to keep his campaign alive. Gingrich also needs strong finishes in Tennessee and Oklahoma to stay competitive.

“Let’s be clear: I have to win Georgia, I think, to be credible in the race,” Gingrich told the Marietta Daily Journal.

If he doesn’t, will this be the end of Newt? Or will he stick around to be a spoiler, to game the system, much in the way Ron Paul has?

The other candidate in the race, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, has not yet won a state in the 2012 contest. But he’s hoping to pull off wins in Idaho, North Dakota and Alaska. All three states hold caucuses — contests at which Paul’s avid supporters excel.

I’m sure he can count on the far, far, far right militia vote, based on his newsletters….OK, cheap shot. Why is Paul still in this race? He has no chance of winning, he adds little to the debate, heck, most aren’t even bothering to make fun of him anymore, meaning he is mostly ignored. I know I’m upsetting Paul supporters, but, realistically, all Paul can do is create a minor kerfuffle with his few delegates come convention time.

Politico has 10 things to watch, which includes who wins Ohio, what is Romney’s margin of victory, can Gingrich place 2nd anywhere, where do the Catholic and Evangelic votes go, and, how do women vote? A poll by the Washington Times of GOP primary voters suggests that there are many who think the contraception debate is a loser.

Their fight with President Obama over contraceptive coverage is becoming a losing battle for Republicans, a significant chunk of whom reject GOP leaders’ stance that it’s a fight about religious liberty, according to the latest Washington Times/JZ Analytics poll.

A fact that should thrill liberals is that 30.2% of the respondents think the issue of the contraception mandate is more about women’s health than about religious freedom. Unfortunately, the GOP was not able to get the message out, they allowed the media and Democrats (but, I repeat myself) to frame the narrative, and, let’s face it, the Rush Limbaugh kerfuffle derailed the efforts. Which is why most of the candidates have focused on the economy and energy prices. It also shows that even Republicans have been brainwashed by the “I’m entitled” society.

0
  • JoeBritton

    Well, one would have to guess that Romney was well served by Limbaugh, when he refused to support Romney’s pseudo-conservative appeals. But as the Limbaugh follies continue, Romney has also failed to disassociate himself from his antifemine remarks, making it likely that he can have it both ways. This position fits in well with Romney’s flip-flopping, having it both ways, which might serve him well in this instance.

    Some poor Ohioans might also believe Romney’s wife’s recent claim that they are not wealthy. Conservatives like to be fooled.

    So it’s Romney.

  • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

    If Romney’s the nominee, then Obamacare, Wall Street bailouts, cap and trade and amnesty for illegals get tossed right out the window as campaign issues. Face it: the only advantages Romney has in the Republican primary fight are lots of money and a big organisation. Obama will dwarf him in both money and manpower, leaving Romney only one advantage: he has nice hair. if you think he can beat Obama in November based solely on having nicer hair, then by all means vote for Romney.

    • http://www.vega.com/ Vega – Poli-Cultural Humorist

      Cav, honestly, Gingrich and Santorum are worse candidates. Romney is the best you’ve got at this point.

      • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

        Do you think we don’t know you want Obama to win? Of course you want the Republicans to run Romney against him!

        • http://www.vega.com/ Vega – Poli-Cultural Humorist

          I said honestly, Cav. Strategically, Santorum and Gingrich would be ideal for Obama to beat.

          All those things you mentioned, the other two carry that same baggage, along with a host of other baggage.

          Santorum and Gingrich are jokes.

          • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

            “I said honestly, Cav. ”

            Honestly, we all know you want Obama to win, so any “advice” you offer must be seen in that light.

          • http://www.vega.com/ Vega – Poli-Cultural Humorist

            No, that’s just your paranoia.

            I can be objective, this isn’t official campaign communications.

            You think liberals and Obama supporters are afraid of Santorum and Gingrich? Seriously?

          • http://www.cavalierx.com CavalierX

            “I can be objective,”

            To a Liberal, “objective” means pretending the Leftist postition is the neutral one, just like “compromise” means making the other side come 90% while you go 10%. Everyone here knows you wave the pom-poms for Obama, Vega.

            “You think liberals and Obama supporters are afraid of Santorum and Gingrich? Seriously?”

            Fear? Why do you Leftists believe everyone “thinks” with their emotions, as you do? Fear is immaterial. Republicans win when they nominate people with strong convictions. That’s just history. Gingrich can fake them quite well, and Santorum actually has some. Fear has nothing to do with it.

          • http://www.vega.com/ Vega – Poli-Cultural Humorist

            The first part is paranoid nonsense, Cav. Sorry. Objective means objective.

            Secondly, if Republicans based their votes on conviction, they would nominate Ron Paul. The others have no distinctions in conviction.

            And I didn’t say you fear anything. I said do you think we fear Laurel and Hardy.

          • mightysamurai

            “I can be objective”

            Of course you can. You just choose not to.

          • mightysamurai

            “I said honestly, Cav.”

            Well gosh, if you say you’re being honest then clearly you are. I mean, someone telling a lie while claiming they’re telling the truth would be simply unprecedented in the entire span of human history!

          • http://www.vega.com/ Vega – Poli-Cultural Humorist

            In my case, it’s true. I am not trying to deceive Cavalier. To what end?

  • http://www.wordaroundthenet.com Christopher Taylor

    My guess is there will be no conclusive winner and the primaries will go on.  Like the Democrats in 2008.  Boy, that sure ruined them.

    • baoxian

      Yeah, I don’t think it’s all bad for the candidates to stay in the news for another three months, or to avoid giving the left a target to tee up well in advance.

      Obama certainly avoided a lot of scrutiny by not being nominated until nearly September of 2008. He only had to run a two month campaign and obviously got a pass from the media on his personal history and record.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info