For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Sarah Palin Interviewed By Rush And Oprah, A Study In Contrasts
Written By : Melissa Clouthier

The Sarah Palin – Oprah interview couldn’t have been more different than the Sarah Palin – Rush interview. I watched the Oprah interview yesterday after having not watched the Oprah Show in years. I listened to Rush today after listening intermittently for years. If I tell you how long, you’ll realize I’m older than I look, so I won’t tell you.

Anyway, before I get into the details, my overarching impression wasn’t related to Sarah Palin at all, but rather to the state of the press in general. For example, here’s Sarah Palin going into hostile Obama-loving territory on Oprah. She was on edge, and fought defensiveness, much like her interview with Katie Couric. But she did it. Unlike Barack Obama, who has studiously avoided any interview from anyone who isn’t a “friendly”, Palin demonstrates some gumption. [Barack Obama has decided to grant Fox an interview tonight, reportedly.] Luckily for him, that’s a rather small group and only one network who are fair and balanced–which is to say they’re not kissing his ass 24/7–but if any conservative did the same, the conservative wouldn’t ever be on TV or interviewed by any newsweekly, period. There are no even remotely neutral media sources. Who? MSNBC? NBC? ABC? CNN? CBS? Newsweek? Time? The New York Times? Who is fair? Who doesn’t lean so far left that they’re imploding for lack of viewers and/or readers and the ad dollars eyeballs drive?

Right.

So, here’s Sarah Palin going forward into Oprah’s female den of iniquity. Oprah needs Sarah like Sarah needs Oprah. Sarah Palin needs to appeal to a broader slice of the electorate. Oprah needs ratings. It’s mutually beneficial and one of the bile-inducing decisions politicians make. Oprah doesn’t ask Sarah Palin substantive questions. Oprah asks Oprah questions–about Levi coming to Thanksgiving, about her marriage, etc. Rush Limbaugh called the questions “soap opera stuff”, but that’s Oprah’s audience. Palin did relatively well. The Anchoress sums it up this way:

Palin struck me as too guarded and needlessly defensive. Toward the end, Oprah asked if she had anything else to say, and Palin unwisely blurted out, “you can’t turn off my mic…” which was very revealing. As I said over two twitters:

there is a brittle defensiveness to Palin that was not there before; she’s clearly carrying scabs from being savaged in ‘08 BUT…you can’t do that in politics. She was treated (IS still treated) abominably by press, but if she can’t transcend that she’s out

Okay, political analysis in 140 characters doesn’t really work, but yeah, it seems to me that Palin is showing her scars from the detestable way the press descended on her and her family like a pack of rabid canines and worked to literally destroy Palin when she emerged in ‘08.

But the press tried to destroy Reagan, and they tried to destroy Bush; they could only get so far, because both men were able to shake the rutting mutts off their legs with aplomb, and look forward. It is a quality of character, part of it comes from knowing who you are and -as we see happening- it encourages people to take a second look, or a third, if need be.

I have suspected that Palin does know who she is, but she’s been rattled, and it shows. And so, she is talking about media mistreatment; her charges are not untrue, but tonguing the wounds will not help her with the people she needs to win over. They will see it merely as an unattractive, vindictive quality, rather ala Obama. Who wants more of that?

Sarah Palin needs to deal with this den of vicious beasts better. And they are vicious. Camille Paglia, who The Anchoress quotes, says succinctly:

She also needs a shrewder, cooler take on the mainstream media, with its preening bullies, cackling witches, twisted cynics and pompous windbags. The Northeastern media establishment is in decline, and everyone knows it.

Rush’s interview, in contrast, made Sarah Palin sound like a wise elder statesman. He didn’t throw softballs. To the contrary, he asked her substantive policy questions. Guess what? She didn’t stumble. She flowed. It was great to listen to, really, and heartening. Rush asked her questions on everything from national security, foreign policy, oil exploration, health care and illegal immigration. Not one stutter. Not one hiccup. She was flawless.

It wasn’t just her form. Her substance was pure, unapologetic small-government conservative. It was like taking a breath of fresh political air, if such a thing exists. D.C. smells gives off the fetid fumes of months dead fish in the still undrained swamp. Sarah Palin is not D.C. She brings the brisk, clean Alaskan air and sends a chill down the spines of Democrats and Republican establishment types. They are right to fear her. She is formidable.

I want Sarah Palin to succeed.

Sarah Palin must though, find a way to be at ease answering any question that the superficial, bigoted, condescending North Eastern blue bloods throw at her. Underneath, these people are insecure. It rattles them to their bones that a state college educated, wife, mother, politician and governor could best them. Their insecurity will get more piqued as President Obama continues to waffle, avoid and hide–from unfriendly press, from dictators, from tough decisions, from failure.

Sarah Palin will have to get used to wearing the mantle of leader. That means that she’ll have to own the fact that she’s so formidable that Barack Obama has finally, at long last, decided to man up and face Fox. (It won’t be much of a feat. Geeze, O’Reilly already loves him and the rest of the cast like him, too. It’s only the talking heads like Beck and Hannity that dislike the guy. What a weenie Obama has been avoiding Fox. So typical, though.)

Obama illustrates the point though. He’s weak. He will only take the easy road. Sarah Palin, by nature of being conservative, chooses the more difficult road. It’s just the way it is. She needs to own it. She needs to march down the road with cheerful grace. These self-important press and establishment types cannot handle good humor. They have no sense of humor about themselves. A well-placed gentle jibe will do more than 100 well-circumscribed answers and cluck-clucking back-tracking. The circumlocution is Obama’s forté. Sarah Palin needs to own everything, be direct and have a ball.

Really, what does Sarah Palin have to lose? What more can they say? The left has shot its load, not they won’t try to reload and make more bullcrap out of whole cloth. Let them. Really. Now is not the time to be defensive or afraid.

As a side note: When Oprah asked her invasive family questions, I noted that Sarah turned and looked at her daughters with love and pain in her eyes. It is disgusting to me that they have to hear the b.s. Some will say, “Well, it’s Sarah’s fault for bringing them.” Really? If Barack and Michelle Obama brought their daughters on Oprah, would she ask them, in front of the girls, about fight rumors and rumors of divorce? Somehow I doubt it.

There is a double standard. It’s despicable. In order to succeed, though, a conservative candidate, man or woman must, as The Anchoress says, transcend it. No doubt, Sarah Palin will have plenty of opportunity to do just that as she faces more hostile interviews.

By the way, I’ll be on Rick Moran’s show on BlogTalkRadio tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. He will be saying that Sarah sucks. Please listen or call in.

0
  • gfchicago

    I too watched Oprah for the first time in at least 15 years. All in all I think that Sarah Palin handled herself very well.

  • D-Vega

    Sounds like Sarah Palin is being positioned as the Messiah.

  • Tennwriter

    Messiah? No. The Messiah, by one account, perhaps apocryphal, had the look in His eyes of a Roman general who is on the battlefield, and sees that he is going to win, all the factors have been played, and it just needs to be played out.

    The Messiah would have looked into Oprah’s eyes, and she would have shivered.

    However, Palin is about what Conservatives expect out of their political leaders. The sad part is that so often we have to make do with less.

  • President_Friedman

    Posted by D-Vega
    2009-11-17 16:44:16

    Palin certainly has a subset of fans who treat her that way, but overall I think there are an awful lot of conservatives like myself who have been in ‘wait and see’ mode w/ Palin and are slowly moving from “tepid” to “lukewarm” (or from lukewarm to fully enthusiastic).

    While I still would like to hear more substantial policy ideas from her, and while I will probably always find myself cringing a lot when she speaks (sadly she’s much more GWB than Ronald Reagan when it comes to public speaking), the clincher for me will be what she does with the money her PAC is now making. If she dumps the lion’s share of it into support for conservative candidates in 2010, and it actually serves to help get them elected, I’ll be way impressed. If she blows money by ineffectually supporting a bunch of candidates who can’t/don’t win, or if she hoards it all for a 2012 POTUS run, I’ll be able to move on with no regrets.

  • Jack Schite

    “rather to the state of the press in general”

    Press? There was no press there. There were two interviews by talk show hosts.

    Press? Give us a break. Palin’s brainlessness reveals itself whenever even the most lightweight reporter starts asking her questions.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    My brainlessness reveals itself whenever I Post.
    Posted by Jack Schite
    2009-11-17 17:39:14

    TFTFY, Jack Auf.

  • Mike_M

    Whether she runs or not I want Sarah Palin to succeed. She is essentially Howard Roark. An individual that is going to do things her way, dynamite her own accomplishments if he can’t have them on her own terms, and be willing to absorb the worst the left can dish out before compromising her principles.

    By virtue of her individualism she is a leader for conservatives. She is showing us the formula for taking on the mass media and liberal collectivism, and that it’s possible to survive even if it means taking some lumps.

    Is she the best choice for President in 2012? Probably not. Might she win if other Republicans are too spineless to stand up to the liberals and take the lumps that go with it? Absolutely.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Palin is not, in my opinion, presidential material. She is however a powerful and effective voice for conservatism that the left cannot ignore and she can be incredibly useful in pushing for the cause and fundraising for people who need it.

  • President_Friedman

    Posted by Mike_M
    2009-11-17 17:50:21

    I’m not quite sold on Palin as Howard Roarke. She is still a political animal. For instance, Howard Roarke would never have endorsed TARP in order to secure his position as a VP nominee. But when it comes to walking the walk, Palin is certainly a vast improvement on what we’ve seen from the GOP in recent memory.

  • Mike_M

    “I’m not quite sold on Palin as Howard Roarke.”

    Well, nobody is. That’s why The Fountainhead is a work of fiction, and why the failed-Roarks in the book ended up as intellectual sadists or miserable alcoholics.

    But I’m not looking for a paragon of conservatism, just somebody who will tell the truth and not be intimidated into silence by the left. In the end there is no “right” or “conservative base”. It’s all individuals, and until a more capable individual steps up, Palin is it.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Sounds like Sarah Palin is being positioned as the Messiah.

    You say that as if you had any room to complain about it. Get back to me when she starts commissioning Greek temples for her political appearances.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    When people start photographing her with a halo, when crowds faint and pray at her appearances, when there’s repeated messianic references to her in the conservative media and pictures of her as a savior, then the left will have room to begin to talk maybe a little about it.

    Until then you have a huge crap sandwich with President Obama as chocolate Jesus and you have to eat every crumb, because he’s your monster.

  • CoolCzech

    I’m always tempted to throw my support to Palin, but there’s something about her that always makes me hold back a little. Maybe it’s the way she can’t seem to shake off even the Bristol & Levi thing – all she need do is say, “Hey, hands off Bristol!” with conviction, but can’t manage it. Right now she’s the single most Republican out there (amazing, considering she’s not even in office), but I’ll wsit and see if she can get beyond some of the soap opera and begin to truly articulate serious policy positions.

    I do hope she can.

  • CoolCzech

    Umm, I meant she’s the most important Republican out there, as shown by her influence vis a vi “death panels” and NY23. I can’t imagine any other Republican with that kind of clout.

  • D-Vega

    Demogougery is not clout. It’s just the squeaky wheel. And in the case of Republicans, its one of the few wheels out there at all.

    You say that as if you had any room to complain about it. Get back to me when she starts commissioning Greek temples for her political appearances.

    Maybe not Greek Temples, but definitely Cleopatra’s wardrobe and stylists.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Might be a good look for her.

    And Vega: you, like everyone else on the left, protest too much about Palin. It’s pretty transparent.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Demogougery is not clout.

    And repeating “demagoguery” over and over again is not an argument.

    Maybe not Greek Temples, but definitely Cleopatra’s wardrobe and stylists.

    Yeah D-Vega, go ahead and deflect away. It’ll save you the trouble of admitting your own hypocrisy.

  • D-Vega

    And repeating “demagoguery” over and over again is not an argument.

    Interesting to note that you are not disputing the assertion that she is simply a demogogue.

    Yeah D-Vega, go ahead and deflect away. It’ll save you the trouble of admitting your own hypocrisy.

    Interesting you were the first one to deflect by talking about Greek temples.

  • TheBaud

    Interesting to note that you are not disputing the assertion that she is simply a demogogue.

    Posted by D-Vega 2009-11-18 15:44:37

    You are welcome to continue to ‘assert” that she is a demogogue… or a Martian… or a tadpole…

    Your assertion does not make it true!

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Interesting you were the first one to deflect by talking about Greek temples.

    Dude. You immediately responded to the post by saying conservatives were treating this woman as their messiah, don’t even try that crap. You brought up the topic by deflecting from the content of the main post. This woman dements you guys as bad as President Bush used to.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info