Scientists: Dogs Would Rather Earn Treats Than Get Handouts
People who earn their own way are contented and healthy, whereas those who vote for a living and rely on coercive wealth redistribution are miserable wretches. This is the consequence of universal principles that science proves apply also to dogs:
In a series of experiments, scientists found dogs were happier when they earned a reward by performing a task, rather than just being handed a treat.
Dogs were either rewarded for operating various devices like a lever that makes a bell ring, or rewarded when some other dog did it. Exactly as with humans, the dogs who earned the rewards were happy, whereas the others were demoralized.
According to the scientists,
‘Experimental dogs showed signs of excitement (for example, increased tail wagging and activity) in response to their achievements, whereas controls showed signs of frustration (for example chewing of the operant device) in response to the unpredictability of the situation.
‘Our results suggest that dogs react emotionally to problem-solving opportunities and that tail wagging may be a useful indicator of positive affective states in dogs.’
The tail wagging part isn’t any more obvious than the basic truth that it is better to earn something than to have it bestowed on you.
Hopefully dogs know better than to let anyone make them feel guilty when they earn treats while less ambitions dogs don’t.
On tips from Lyle and Artfldgr. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.
When liberals look at the poor, first and foremost, they see people who will vote for them in exchange for goodies. This gives liberals a perverse incentive to keep as...Read More
Liberals don’t actually care about science. Let me repeat that: Liberals don’t actually care about science. What they care about
CHURCHVILLE, VA – Is the Green Movement finally ready to face the global need to triple crop yields over the
Over at the New York Times, Ross Douthat, who’s a true believer in global warming, wrote a surprisingly intriguing piece