Can this be optimal?

I’ve been gradually warming up to soccer, at least as played by the better European clubs. But one question I have is this:: ESPN, The Magazine, 9/19, p. 114, reports that in the English Premier League, averaging over the last four seasons, the percentage of shots on goal was a hair more than 36%.

To compare, the percentage of passes completed in the NFL on 3rd down and 8 or longer is roughly–this season, as I write–about the same. But in the NFL the receiver will usually be personally defended, the passer will often be pressured, and most importantly, the receivers’ reach is much, much smaller than a soccer goal. I understand that soccer players should shoot for the edges of the goal because that reduces the chances of the goalie blocking the shot.

But can it really be smart to shoot nearly 2/3 of the time with no chance of scoring? I assume so because there are many, independent, highly paid professionals in competition, but it seems odd.

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles


“The 25 Sports Records That Are Impossible To Break”

No argument from me on the top three:: Cy Young, Gretzky, and Ripken. Cross-posted from Newmark’s Door.


“The 30 Most Embarrassing Plays in Sports History”

It’s a tough list. Buckner booting the ball is only 12th.


“Cheat with Science: Why Smart B-Ballers Bank on the Bank Shot”

Research done at my university, NC State, confirms what the Wizard of Westwood always taught:: use the glass.


Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!