For Advertising Info, Write.
rwnews@blogads.com
Premium Left blogad
Left Blog Ad

Advertisement
Why Would Americans Be For An Afghan Surge?
Written By : Melissa Clouthier

Americans poll positive on surging in Afghanistan. Why would that be? Because most Americans have dealt with moles, ant-hills, head lice, or some other kind of nasty infestation. The bugs die when they are 1. exterminated and 2. the environment is cleaned up.

Libs hate George W. Bush for his warmongering ways. They’re giving Barack Obama a hypocritical pass. But Bush knew that this two pronged approach is necessary to rid of pests…especially murderous pests. Killing them works, but making the environment clean so that bugs don’t grow is important for prevention.

Americans have stayed amazingly consistent: Kill the bugs. Clean the house. This is just common sense.

H/T Instapundit

0
  • Robert_Ingersoll

    Obviously you either don't listen or are too stupid to retain the fact that Americans regardless of political affiliation have supported the war in Afghanistan from the beginning.

  • happirick

    Sometimes you have to set traps and disappear for awhile to get the bugs to come out. My own belief is that we should not be cleaning up Afghanistan. We can't want a democratic nation for them more than they want it for themselves. Instead, let things go back to whatever they want over there. If they step out of line, go back in and smash the bugs again once they're out in the open again.

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    Americans regardless of political affiliation have supported the war in Afghanistan from the beginning.

    Repeat that lie often enough and some day even you might start to believe it.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Obviously you either don't listen or are too stupid to retain the fact that Americans regardless of political affiliation have supported the war in Afghanistan from the beginning.

    Posted by Robert_Ingersoll

    2009-10-14 10:20:43

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/july-dec01/peace_protest.html

    In Berkeley, California, people were on the streets in protest, even before the military strikes began. Their demonstrations and rallies calling for a "non-military approach" to capturing terrorist Osama bin Laden was also represented in Capitol Hill.

    You are too stupid to be alive, please go curl up in a corner, and kindly STFU. You have now been relegated to the heap of irrelavant trolls smacked down at RWN. May you rot in your own ignorance.

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    BTW RI, for your benefit, that article is dated 10/18/01, in case you're too stupid to follow a link. Just 37 days after 9/11!!

  • happirick

    >> In Berkeley, California, people were on the streets in protest, even before the military strikes began. Their demonstrations and rallies calling for a "non-military approach" to capturing terrorist Osama bin Laden was also represented in Capitol Hill.

    He said "Americans", not Berkleyites, were for the war.

  • Mike_M

    Leave it to the liberals to Stay the Course in Iraq, the "war of choice", and jeopardize Afghanistan "the war of necessity" by refusing to committ the resources needed to win.

    Barak Hussein Obama, ladies and gentlemen, your 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner! *uproarious applause*

  • http://PatriotPost.US bthewolf

    Posted by happirick

    2009-10-14 11:34:52

    LOL!! Yeah I guess I missed that, of course Berkley is, regrettably(sp), in the US, so you can see where I could make that mistake.

  • BIG

    If they step out of line, go back in and smash the bugs again once they're out in the open again.

    Posted by happirick

    2009-10-14 10:35:56

    Let me see if I understand what you are saying. Are you claiming that it would be better to let Islamic terrorism attack the US every few years and then go in and clean it up after each and every attack? How many more smoking holes do you want to see in American cities before you would call for the extermination of this problem?

    He said "Americans", not Berkleyites, were for the war.

    Posted by happirick

    2009-10-14 11:34:52

    And now you are claiming that Berkleyites are not Americans? I think you should go to a doctor while you can to get that cranial sphincter procedure done.

  • happirick

    Dear Big

    Thank you for the kind words. Now, onto your points:

    1. I am saying that we are not any good at nation building – we don't have the stomach for what it takes to first maintain order, a precondition to democracy. We ARE very good at blowing things up though and in a short time – just the attention span that this nation has. Just because we destroyed the Taliban govt 8 years ago does not mean we have to remain in Afghanistan forever trying to build something there. We should certainly monitor the situation if we're not there. If the Taliban takes over again, well that's the business of the Afghans. If we keep our eyes open and determine that they are once again a threat, then it would be ok to take them out again.

    2. Sarcasm – look it up in a dictionary.

  • RtWingNtCase

    Ingersoll,

    Have you not been paying attention to the news recently? Or did I not hear that folks like Nanci Pelosi wanted us to pull out of Afghanistan?

    I heard the democrats say during the campaign that Afghanistan was the "good" war, and now they're waffling. If they support it so much, then give us the resources to win.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Yeah the US is so bad at nation building Japan, Germany and Iraq have all become horrible dicatorships again.

  • D-Vega

    Don't forget about Somalia, Bosnia, Lebanon, Vietnam, El Salvador, Afghanistan in the 80's, etc., CT.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Those were examples of nation building? Perhaps you mean something different by that term than…. well nearly every one else on earth.

  • D-Vega

    You would have to explain your definition first, CT. As those other countries as examples of nation-building. Failures, but still attempts at nation-building.

  • Mike_M

    "You would have to explain your definition first, CT."

    Uh, nation building is defined as building nations.

    Somalia, Bosnia, Lebanon, Vietnam, and the others were police actions. Bush correctly determined that painting bullseyes on our troops and sending them to patrol hostile dictatorships probably wasn't a good idea. Everything he did was based on regieme change and the establishment of democracy…an action with a historically good success rate.

    Lo and behold, the Iraq War is won with US troops out of the cities and preparing to leave, and the terrorists are throwing everything they can at Afghanistan in a last ditch effort to maintain a foothold there. As opposed to Somalia (failed state), Bosnia (still a UN refugee camp), Lebanon (failed state run by Iran), and Vietnam (Communist South China).

  • D-Vega

    The Iraq War is won and we are preparing to leave? Really, Mike?

  • http://www.superdickery.com mightysamurai

    The Iraq War is won and we are preparing to leave? Really, Mike?

    Yes, really. The troops are scheduled to begin withdrawing shortly, as per the plan set forth by President Bush (you know, the one Obama illegally tried to derail during the 08 campaign?).

  • RtWingNtCase

    D-Vega,

    Yes, really. I just got back from there – the Iraqis are in charge and the ISF is running the show. The drawdown plan port-elections will bring home about 70% of the force, and I'll be back in the summer as part of the Transition Force that will finish getting us out by the end of 2011. Our role will be down to training and providing enablers(ISR, CAS, etc.).

    The key is peaceful elections in January. If that happens, then the Iraq War will have succeeded well, and anyone who thinks otherwise is merely deluding themselves:

    : Saddam Hussein gone – check

    : A democratically elected government in place – check

    : An ISF that can hold its own security – check

    : An Iraq that is capable enough to defend itself but not built to be a threat – check

    Please provide what you would add to this that could change the definition of success. Only WMDs not found is troubling, although even I'll admit that is a big hole. But a stable and democratic Iraq that is in the process of standing on its own again is a worthy outcome, and one I've seen just about come to fruition.

  • RtWingNtCase

    *post-elections…damn this keyboard!

  • D-Vega

    I don't want to be negative on Iraq, RWNC.

    I truly hope you are correct and we are soon on our way out.

  • BIG

    You would have to explain your definition first, CT. As those other countries as examples of nation-building. Failures, but still attempts at nation-building.

    Posted by D-Vega

    2009-10-14 15:13:12

    There is a difference in the lists. Germany, Japan, South Korea were all rebuilt by America. Your examples, Bosnia, Somalia, Lebanon were all place the UN was involved in the nation building. When the focus is on building a democracy vs. setting up kiddie brothels, nation building works.

  • BIG

    We are going to have a presence in Iraq for many decades. We are still in Germany and Japan after 3 generations. And with such nice neighbors as Syria and Iran, leaving Iraq would create a bloodbath unseen since the last leftest victory in Vietnam. But I do hope the number of troops is greatly reduced and the nosey neighbors get clipped a bit to make it a better neighborhood.

  • Mike_M

    "The Iraq War is won and we are preparing to leave? Really, Mike?"

    Uh yeah. Checked the news lately?

    Maybe Obama can redeploy troops to Chicago…which is now more dangerous than Baghdad.

  • happirick

    Japan, Germany and Iraq – the first two are from a different era. Germans that were still making trouble as late as 1947 were lined up and shot. The press did not report that as a major event or abuse. Just imagine if we had tried that in Iraq. That's what I meant – we don't have the stomach for what it takes sometimes to force order on a society. I would argue that maintaining civil order is the first thing to accomplish – democracy can come later. Thats how the brits did it 100-200 years ago and they were truly brutal about it. But those methods won't fly in today's world.

  • http://networdblog.blogspot.com/ Christopher_Taylor

    Yeah different era, different culture, nobody can bring democracy to the heathen Japanese, they have never had such a thing… oops… well nobody can bring democracy to Iraq, they've never had such a thing… oops…

    Maybe people take to democracy naturally and its in all of us, the longing for liberty. Maybe it works everywhere, and some folks just don't care for certain people to be free.

Advertisement
Featured Video

The History of Ernesto Che Guevara – A Short Story

php developer india
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Previous Features

Ads

The Best Quotes From “Ten Prayers God Always Says Yes To”
Hey Lady Gaga, Kids Have a Time-Tested Answer for Bullies: Punch Them in the Mouth
Seven Differences Between Winners And Losers
The Problem With The Occupy Wall Street Generation
The 20 Most Influential Black Republicans
Talking With Chuck D. From Public Enemy About Farrakhan, Air America’s Failure, And Open Borders
Advertisement
User Info