Netanyahu Just Gave Obama the MIDDLE FINGER
It is no secret that since Obama has taken office, U.S. relations with Israel has taken a nosedive. Obama has shown time and time again his disregard for our allies and their safety, while disrespecting Israel’s great leader with no shame whatsoever. It is infuriating just to think about… Now, in more recent developments, there was suppose to be a meeting between the two world leaders this month, however- it looks like things have changed…
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declined an offer to meet President Barack Obama at the White House later this month and canceled his trip to Washington, the White House said on Monday, citing Israeli news reports.
Netanyahu’s decision to nix his U.S. visit marked the latest episode in a fraught relationship with Obama that has yet to recover from their deep differences over last year’s U.S.-led international nuclear deal with Iran, Israel’s arch-foe.
The White House said the Israeli government had requested a Netanyahu meeting with Obama on either March 18 or 19 and that he was offered a March 18 encounter two weeks ago.
The bare bones logistics of the cancellation are coming down to a case of he said she said. Israel originally requested the meeting and supposedly offered a two day window when it could take place. Washington claims they offered one of those two days, but Netanyahu’s office is saying that the White House couldn’t accommodate their schedule. There’s either been some crossed wires or somebody has changed their story if this is truly just a scheduling problem. But could it be something more?
Israel is still steamed over the Iran nuke deal for sure, but there’s also the recent move by the President to issue a signing statement on the anti-BDS bill saying that he would not enforce provisions put in place to protect Israel’s interests. Obama has given Bibi plenty of reasons to be a bit piqued, so this may well be more than a simple matter of missing something on a calendar.
It seems to me that Netanyahu could be playing a longer game here as well. Is it possible that Israel is seeing Obama as a lame duck at this point and simply choosing to table any major action until they can deal with the next administration? They’ll have far better prospects if a Republican takes office next January, but if it’s Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office, Israel will pretty much be stuck with the status quo. It’s not unreasonable to surmise that Bibi is seeing any investment of political capital with Obama as a waste of time if it’s Hillary and potentially a detriment if he’s going to be dealing with Trump, Cruz or Rubio.
The situation is complicated by the pending negotiations over the next U.S. aid package for Israel. As early as a month ago there was speculation that Netanyahu was unhappy with the terms that Obama was offering and might just put the negotiations on the back burner until there was a new White House occupant. The current deal doesn’t expire until 2018 and Israel is looking to bump up American contributions closer to $5B annually, a figure Obama has balked at. (Reuters)
Israel may be unable to reach a new defense aid agreement with the Obama administration and could wait for the next U.S. president to secure better terms, a senior Israeli official said on Monday in a veiled rebuke signaling a snag in negotiations.
But a senior U.S. official urged Israel to accept an increased 10-year multibillion-dollar package that President Barack Obama is offering, saying whoever occupies the White House next would be unlikely to demonstrate any greater commitment to Israel’s security.
Differences between the two sides, which surfaced after a round of negotiations on a new defense memorandum of understanding (MOU) last week, underscored continuing tensions over last year’s U.S.-led nuclear deal with Iran, Israel’s regional arch-foe.
Common sense would lead you to believe that with the primary heating up so much over here, Netanyahu has the option to claim meeting now would give off the appearance that he is playing favorites and “interfering” in the election. That would be a brilliant way to handle any opposition coming his way, in regards to not making the meeting, while still putting the ‘oomph’ in the birdie he’s flashing Obama…Just saying.
Even though my father, brother, uncles and grandfather were in the military, I seldom handled guns growing up. That’s because unlike many of the other people in my family, I’ve...Read More
This is where I'm to talk about myself in the 3rd person. I tried, it was weird. I'm no fancy blogger, nor is my grammar perfection, just a Homeschool Mom, that joined the blogging world unexpectedly and now here I am. I believe we need the U.S. flag waving from our porches, God in our schools, and guns in our holsters. I intend to raise my kids to honor God and country, just the same.
UGO did an article called the “Best Heroes of All Time.” It featured the “100 greatest heroes of entertainment.” That
After the 2006 election, the question you heard conservatives asking over and over again was, “Did the Republicans learn anything
On a semi-regular basis throughout the year, RWN has posted “Quotes/Excerpts of the Day.” Here are my favorite 12 for