RWN is the best spot for a green horn right wing blogger like yourself to learn your trade. RWN is one of the few right wing blogs to allow left wing counter comments. That is good for you, because you will learn quicker when the left wingers eat you alive over every misstep you make (and you will make some doozies in the process).

*great* column, that is

Brian, the two gentlemen who posted on this thread are resident libs. They are not altogether capable of realizing the ridiculousness of things they are saying.

Brian, the two gentlemen who posted on this thread are resident libs. They are not altogether capable of realizing the ridiculousness of things they are saying.
Posted by Yevgeny
2010-02-28 00:48:59

Actually that’s kind of misleading. Calling these two “resident libs” implies that they are legitimate and seomwhat house broken left leaning members like D-Vega and Rmiller. These two are trolls and trouble makers. One only has to look at things like the tone of jackie boy’s 01:05:26 post to see that they are NOT here to discuss things in a ratinal manner, but to disrupt and cause trouble.

Both deserve to have their fingers broken with a claw hammer.

Brian, there you go, starting off on the wrong foot. So you got your degree from what, Oral Roberts U.?

Another intellectually lacking republican, to be redundent.

This coming from a tool posting under a pseudonym to avoid anyone reviewing their credentials.

if you’re going to insult someone’s intelligence, you should at least run it through a spell checker first.

Are you kidding? That’s a good part of the laughter we get at the idiot Leftists (but I repeat myself) who comment here.

Brian,

Jack is likely a liberal. Not me, but some RWN conservative commentators apparently think so. I can only chalk that up to the fact that they appear to be supply side tax cutter devotees who choose to stick their heads in the sand regarding the spendidng side of the federal budget deficit problem.

They get upset whenever I point out that Reagan, George W Bush, and the GOP controlled Congress under George W Bush did little to correct the structural federal budget deficit when they implemented their voodoo supply side economic kool aid laced with “deficits don’t matter” poison. All they know is tax cuts, Laffer curve, and increased reveunes. They believe that maximizing tax revenues by cutting taxes to an optimal level will magically correct the nation’s systemic budget deficit problem. They do not seem to want to face up to the hard fact that the federal budget cannot be brought into balance without tax increases UNLESS huge cuts are also made in the social security and medicare entitlement programs. When I suggest that conservatives should hold political candidates seeking the conservative vote to the fire regarding specific proposals to cut spendidng in social security and medicare, the resident supply siders go on the attack against the messenger.

Posted by Power_System_Oper
2010-02-28 14:14:48

Reagan tried to make cuts in spending, moron, but the DEMS in Congress kept jacking up spending even over Reagan’s vetos and threats of shutting down the Federal Govt.

bthewolf,

Check the facts. The DEM controlled Congress never passed a budget which called for more spending than did Reagan’s budget proposals that he submitted to Congress. The total spending was about the same. Their differences lie in the areas of spending, not total spending.

A fact that cannot be denied is that the Federal Budget came closer to being in balance after Clinton was President and the GOP controlled Congress. At that time, a compromise was reached in which taxes were increased and spending was reduced. When George W Bush became President and the GOP controlled Congress, taxes were reduced, spending was increased, and budget deficits began to increase again.

it will aslo take huge cuts in social security and medicare

And that is how we can tell you’re a leftist hoping to pass for a right-winger (disgruntled, natch).

What it will also take, besides tax cuts, are massive SPENDING cuts. Not just social security and medicare, but substantial reductions in the power the State has over its citizens.

And tax cuts. No voodoo there. And no no-pain BS either, tax cuts exist to favor entrepeneurship, and that is as far from no-pain as possible.

When I refer to voodoo supply side economics, I refer to the kool aid laced with the poison of “deficits don’t matter” version which was the version that was practiced by Reagan

You can repeat this lie as often as you want, it won’t magically become true.

Posted by Power_System_Oper
2010-02-28 18:00:25

Pretty good stuff from the poster who endorsed McCain and endorsed Obama, all within 96 hours.

bthewolf,

What a bunch of hooey. The budget plan you speak of was the kool aid Reagan fed to naive conservatives when he was running for President. There is a whole world of difference between budget plan and budget submittal. Reagan was elected in 1980. Took office in January of 1981. You trying to convince me that Reagan made his first offical White House budget submittal to Congress in February of 1981 is a laugh.

Fact again: Federal spending passed by the DEM controlled Congress under Reagan’s Presidency did not exceed the spending proposed by Reagan in his offical federal budget request submittals to Congress.

Check your Google Pr, backlinks, found pages upon internet search engine and find sociable hyperlinks.

Check your Google Pr, backlinks, indexed pages on internet search engine in order to find social hyperlinks.

Look at your Google Pagerank, backlinks, indexed webpages upon search engine in order to find social links.