Bush Shooting Down The Idea Of ‘NAFTA PLus’ Is Evidence Of A North American Union?

It has often been said that you can’t reason someone out of something that they weren’t reasoned into in the first place and this WorldNetDaily article that is being presented as solid evidence of a North American Union, is a perfect example of it. Here’s a particularly noteworthy excerpt,

On page 101, (Vicente) Fox writes: “I proposed a ‘NAFTA Plus’ plan to President Bush and Canada’s Prime Minister Jean Chrétien to move us toward a single continental economic union, modeled on the European example.”

On the next page, Fox notes the White House was reluctant for this theme to be discussed openly.

“Bush shot the idea down,” Fox continued. “The White House sent word that life would be easier if this Mexican cowboy would stop raising hackles with his talk of a North American Union.”

“Evidently, George Bush forgot to brief Vicente Fox before he began his book tour,” (Jerome) Corsi commented.

“Just give Vicente Fox a microphone,” Corsi told WND. “That’s the best way to bring the SPP out of the shadows and expose the real conspirators, George Bush and Vicente Fox, not those of us who are pointing to government websites and asking questions.

Corsi pointed out that at the third annual Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in August, Bush told a Fox News reporter that anyone who thought the SPP could evolve into a North American Union was a conspiracy theorist.

“Now what’s Bush going to say?” Corsi asked. “Vicente Fox has spilled the beans, admitting he was the chief conspirator in the plan to bring the North American Union into reality.”

So, Vicente Fox asks Bush to sign onto a “single continental economic union,” Bush shoots the idea down, and that’s presented as evidence that Bush is hellbent on imposing a “single continental economic union.”

That makes total sense…to a crazy person maybe or someone from a backwards land.

PS: This reminds me of the Downing Street Memo, which, according to the libs, proved Bush lied about Iraq having WMDs, but which proved exactly the opposite when you read it.

PS #2: By the way, this story is the rule, not the exception with the way that NAU articles generally run. There’s what is actually said, then there’s the interpretation which wildly overstates the facts or twists them completely out of context.

Also see,

The Non-Existent North American Union
There Isn’t Going to Be A North American Union

Share this!

Enjoy reading? Share it with your friends!

Send this to a friend